:: Woreda Disaster Risk Profiles :: Disaster Risk Management Commission

Hamer Woreda Disaster Risk Profile (WDRP)

NATIONAL

DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT COMMISSION

(NDRMC)

WOREDA DISASTER RISK PROFILE (WDRP)

REGION: S.N.N.P

ZONE: SOUTH OMO

WEREDA: HAMER

December, 2020

Addis Ababa

About the National Disaster Risk Management Commission (NDRMC)

The National Disaster Risk Management Commission (NDRMC) was reestablished in

December 2015 and recognized by an act of Council of Ministers (Regulation No.

363/2015) as an autonomous Federal Government office mandated to conduct

appropriate activities for the comprehensive implementation and realization of the

objectives of the National Disaster Risk Management Policy and Strategy and to

coordinate, monitor and provide appropriate support with respect to activities

carried out by the lead sector institutions.

Address: Kirkos Sub-city Behind Dembel City Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

P.O.Box: 5686

Tele: 0115524259/4272

Website: www.dppc.gov.et

Printed in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Citation- This Document May be Cited as Follows:

National Disaster Risk Management Commission (2020), Hamer Woreda Disaster Risk

Profile, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

PREFACE

Ethiopia is well aware of the impact that disasters can have on the

development goals that we are rigorously pursuing through our

Growth and Transformation Plan II. With this recognition we started

a paradigm shift a few years ago, largely triggered by the revised

National Policy and Strategy on Disaster Risk Management.

To make the DRM programme implementation in the country well-informed, a

comprehensive information management system is required. We have been undertaking

a comprehensive risk assessment exercise under which Disaster Risk Profiles are being

prepared for each district and at sub-district levels in the country.

This Wereda Disaster Risk Profile establishes an extensive database on disaster risk

elements that will help decision makers at all levels to be better informed at community

and Wereda level about the characteristics of potential hazards, their potential

exposure, vulnerabilities of communities, capacities and that can also be an input for

Wereda Disaster Risk Reduction Plans and area specific early warning tools.

Wereda Disaster Risk Profiles developed are publically available here for the use of all

development partners and government sectors at all levels. Also, other data sources of

NDRMC, such as Desinventar, Livelihood Baseline and the Early Warning information will

be integrated and harmonized with this Information Management System.

Finally, we need to acknowledge the support of partners who have funded this

programme and we also look for the support of donors and all development partners in

order to achieve the ambitious indicators of this risk information and providing every

district with the disaster risk profile and their respective risk-informed plans.

H.E. Ato Mitiku Kassa

Commissioner

National Disaster Risk Management Commission (NDRMC)

The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE)

PREFACE

Woreda Disaster Risk Profiling (WDRP) is a government owned

programme undertaken by the National Disaster Risk

Management Commission (NDRMC) in collaboration with regional

DRM offices and development partners to provide baseline

information for disaster risk management practices and

activities in the country. The programme is designed by taking

into account the experiences gained from the implementation of pervious strategies

and actions like the Hygo Framework for Action (2000-2015) and the Sendai Framework

for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-2030).

WDRP is composed of diversified indicators including hazard related issues, crop and

livestock production, landholding and environmental issues, human and livestock health

issues, education and social issues at wereda and kebele level. It provides basic and

detailed indicators with both quantitative and qualitative information which obtained

from both primary and secondary data sources.

Moreover, two pages summary of profiles is also prepared to help users easily

understand WDRP results for each wereda without going into detail for all indicators.

In addition to this booklet, developed profiles are uploaded on WDRP website

(http://profile.ndrmc.gov.et) to be viewed by all users; we encourage all DRM actors

at all levels to use this profile as baseline information for all DRM initiatives.

This WDRP booklet was produced through exemplary collaboration of all concerned

bodies and I would like to give my deepest gratitude to all who directly or indirectly

contribute for the success of the programme particularly for data enumerators and

supervisors, data encoders and profile development teams, consultants and advisors,

partner ministries and all DRM stakeholders.

Abraham Abebe

Director

Disaster Risk Reduction and Rehabilitation Directorate (DRRRD)

National Disaster Risk Management Commission (NDRMC)

Contents

No. Indicator Name

Page

General Information

Preface

Wereda Location in Ethiopian Map

III

Methodology

Summary Profile

Hazard Related Characteristics

Biological Hazards of the Wereda

Geological Hazards of the Wereda

Hydro Metrological Hazards of the Wereda

Socio Economic Hazards of the Wereda

Technological Hazards of the Wereda

Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Hazards: Conflict as an Issue

Hazard Situation During Last Disaster - Characteristics of most recent disaster that

affected the community

Frequency of Disaster Occurrence

Household Exposure to Hazards

Months of Occurrence of Frequent Disasters

Conflicts: Perception of households on conflict issues - Is conflict an issue in this

community?

Conflicts: Perception of households on conflict issues - Who do you turn to in case

of a conflict?

Losses from Disasters - Losses from all disasters (household response in %)

Losses from Disasters - Main Losses by Type of Disasters (household response in %) 53

No. Indicator Name

Page

Losses from Disasters - Secondary Losses by Type of Disasters (household response

in %)

Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Infrastructure Access Characteristics

Physical Vulnerability: Access to Roads & Urban Centres - Households access to

road and urban centre

Physical Vulnerability: Access to Electricity - Households’ access and utilization of

electricity

Physical Vulnerability: Type of Dwelling Units - Households’ type of dwelling houses 80

Socio Demographic Characteristics

Economic Vulnerability: Level of Migration - Migration level and its characteristics

by Kebele

Economic Vulnerability: Household Migration - Household migration and reason for

migration

Economic Vulnerability: Household Migration - Disasters as a triggering factor for

migration (households response in %)

Demography: Population Structure

Demography: Population Trends and Ethnic Groups

Social Vulnerability: Household Demographic Characteristics - Demographic

characteristics of households

Social Vulnerability: Level of Educational Attainment - Education status of

household members

Social Vulnerability: Gender Parity - Gender parity in education level (7+ years)

and household heading

Environmental Characteristics

Environmental Situation: Environmental Problems - Major environmental problems

by Kebele

Environmental Situation: Deforestation - Observed changes over levels of

deforestation by the community and its problems

Environmental Situation: Natural Resources Availability - Natural resources

available and changes observed by the community

No. Indicator Name

Page

Environmental Situation: Rainfall & Temperature - Observed changes on rainfall

and temperature by the community over the last decade

107

Environmental Situation: Reasons for Environmental Changes

112

Environmental Situation: Soil Erosion - Observed changes on levels of soil erosion

by the community

113

Livelihood, Occupation and Source of food

Economic Vulnerability: Major Occupational Categories - Major categories of

occupation and percent of population engaged in the occupation by Kebele

116

Economic Vulnerability: Livelihoods - Households important sources of

livelihood (response in %)

118

Economic Vulnerability: Occupational Categories - Percent of population above 15

years age by occupation categories

119

Economic Vulnerability: Sources of Food - Households source for different food

items (response in %)

120

Crop Production

Hazards: Change in Crop Damages - Proportion of total crop damage (percentage

123

response by households)

Hazards: Change in Crop Damages - Major reasons for crop damage (percentage

response by households)

124

Hazards: Change in Crop Damages - Proportion of Damage for Major Crops

125

(percentage response by households)

Hazards: Change in Crop Damages - Reasons for Damage of Major Crops

(percentage response by households)

126

Agricultural Situation: Change in Crops Grown - Five major crops grown by

proportion of total cultivated land

130

Economic Vulnerability: Status of Agriculture - Methods of tillage, Irrigation and

other agricultural input utilization by households

133

Economic Vulnerability: Crops Grown - Number of crops grown by households

134

Economic Vulnerability: Crops Grown - Types of crops grown by households

135

Economic Vulnerability: Crops Grown - Proportion of households by amount of yield

of major crops (last year)

136

Economic Vulnerability: Crops Grown - Proportion of households by amount of yield

of major crops (Five years ago)

137

Economic Vulnerability: Land Ownership and Quality - Landownership of households 138

No. Indicator Name

Page

Economic Vulnerability: Land Ownership and Quality - Farmers’ perception on the

quality of their agricultural land

139

Environmental Situation: Land-Use other than crop production - Types of land use

other than crop production across Kebeles

140

Livestock Production

Agricultural Situation: Status of Livestock Disease - Change In Livestock Disease

Status By Kebele

143

Livestock Prevalent of Diseases & Veterinary Facility - Livestock Diseases

Prevalence

146

Livestock Prevalent of Diseases & Veterinary Facility - Evaluation of Access to

Veterinary Services and Livestock Drugs

147

Agricultural Situation: Livestock Diversity - Type of livestock and their economic

importance in the community

148

Economic Vulnerability: Livestock Ownership and Changes - Percentage of

households by number and type of livestock owned

152

Economic Vulnerability: Livestock Ownership and Changes - Households’ perception

on changes in livestock number in the last five years (response in %)

154

Economic Vulnerability: Livestock Ownership and Changes - Households

perception on changes in livestock number in the last five years (response in %)

155

Agriculture (Livestock): Pasture Availability - Households’ perception on access and

quality of pasture

157

Agriculture (Livestock): Pasture Availability - Households’ perception on

158

problematic months for pasture availability

Agriculture (Livestock): Water Availability - Households’ response on water

availability for livestock

159

Agriculture (Livestock): Water Availability - Households’ perception on problematic

months of water availability for livestock

160

Agriculture (Livestock): Water Availability - Sources of water for livestock

161

(households response in %)

Access to Markets and Credit

Economic Vulnerability: Proportion of Produce Sold and Market - Proportion of

crops and livestock sold from total production and markets

163

Economic Vulnerability: Kebele Access to Markets - Access to market by Kebele

165

No. Indicator Name

Page

Economic Vulnerability: Formal & Informal Transfers - Percentage of households

reporting received formal transfers

166

Economic Vulnerability: Formal & Informal Transfers - Percentage of households

reporting received Informal transfers

169

Capacity: Access to Credit Facilities - Households access to credit facilities

172

Capacity: Access to Credit Facilities - Percentage of households by major reasons

of borrowing money

173

Capacity: Access to Credit Facilities - Percentage of households by major sources

of credit

174

Capacity: Access to Credit Facilities - Percent of households with ability to raise

500 birr in one week

175

Health and Sanitation Characteristics

Household Access to Health Facilities - Where do patients go for health care?

177

Hazards: Health problems and changes over the last decade

178

Household Health Status - Households’ health condition and major health problems 181

Household Access to Sanitation - Percentage of households with access to different

kind of toilet facilities

183

Household Access to Drinking Water - Sources of drinking water for households

(response in %)

184

Household Access to Drinking Water - Households’ methods of treating drinking

185

water

Household Access to Drinking Water - Number of times households fetch water in a

week

186

Household Access to Drinking Water - Time taken per day to fetch water for

households

187

Coping Mechanisms and Preparedness Measures

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Sudden Onset Disasters

189

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Increase in Disaster Intensity

194

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Disasters

202

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

211

Capacity: Type Community Participation

227

No. Indicator Name

Page

Capacity: Recovery from Losses from Disasters - Percentage of Households who

have managed to recover from losses of disasters

229

Capacity: Recovery from Losses from Disasters - Percentage of households

recovered from past disasters by type of Disasters

230

Capacity: Recovery from Losses from Disasters - Proportion of households

recovered by type of Losses

231

Capacity: Coping Options if More Resources Available - What coping strategy could

be adopted if more resource were available?

232

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Percentage of households by

major type of coping strategies adopted (at least once)

233

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies

adopted by households for respective disasters

235

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Secondary coping strategies 241

adopted by households for respective disasters

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies

adopted by households to recover from respective losses

245

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Percentage of households

by frequency of main coping strategies adopted

250

Capacity: Alternative Livelihood Sources - Alternative livelihood sources suggested

by the community

252

Community Perception and Suggestions

Agricultural Situation: Access to Extension - Perception of the community on

Access to Agricultural extension Services

260

Agricultural Situation: Access to Inputs - Perception of the community on access

to improved agricultural inputs

263

Agricultural Situation: Water for irrigation - Access to water for irrigation in the

community

265

Agricultural Situation: Water Availability for Livestock - Water availability for

livestock in the community

267

Agricultural Situation: Soil Fertility - Perception of the community on soil fertility

and its change over time

270

100

Economic Vulnerability: Change in Agricultural Situation - Households perception

on changes of crop type, size of cultivated area and crop yields

272

101

Environmental Situation: General Land Quality - Perceptions of the community

on changes in the general quality of land over a decade

274

No. Indicator Name

Page

102

Environmental Situation: Changes in Landscape - Changes observed by the

community on landscape and the problems due to the changes

276

Interventions: Community Perception on Mediums to Influence DRM Actors -

103

Community perception on the effectiveness of institutional channels to use to

278

influence DRM actors

Interventions: Community Perception on their Knowledge used in DRM Process -

104

Perception of the community on how their knowledge influences the priorities and 286

measures of DRM actors

105

Interventions: Suggestions to improve preparedness - Interventions suggested by

the community to development actors to improve preparedness in the area

288

106

Interventions: Suggestions to DRM Actors in the Area - Community suggested

measures to DRM actors in the area for effective DRM actions

294

107

Economic Vulnerability: Community Suggestions to Improve Economic Situation -

Community suggested measures to improve the economic situation of the area

304

108

Community Awareness of Disaster Risk Management System and Actors

309

Community Perception of DRM System and Actors - Perception of the community on

109

the effectiveness of DRM system in helping them to prevent, cope and recover

317

from disasters

110

Major Public Interventions Desired - Percentage of households by type of

intervention desired

326

Others

111

Capacity: Community Based Organizations

328

112

Supporting Agencies against Disasters - Percentage of households by supporting

330

institutions to handle or recover from disaster damages

113

Types of support received by households during disasters

331

114

Government Actors in the Field of Disaster Risk Management - Government actors

and their activities in the field of Disaster Risk Managements

332

115

Non-Government Actors in the Field of Disaster Risk Management - Non-government

actors and their activities in the field of Disaster Risk Management

336

116

Interventions: Community Suggestions to Development Actors

337

117

Wereda SWOT Analysis

338

WEREDA LOCATON

METHODOLOGY

 WDRP Content :

• Comprehensive information on disaster risk components

(Hazards, Vulnerability and Capacity)

• Multi-sectoral and multi-hazard information.

 Research Approach:

• Mixed Approach

• Both quantitative and qualitative information

 Data Sources:

• Primary Data:

 Household Questionnaires: statistically significant number

(around 400 households).

 Focus Groups Discussions: One per kebele

 Key Informant Interviews: with major woreda level government

and non-government DRM actors

 Problem Tree Analyses : to see the cause and effect of disasters

• Secondary Data:

 collected relevant to WDRP indicators:

 LIU, SERA Project, Risk baseline, other ministries…

 Sampling Technique:

• Multistage cluster sampling

• Both Probability and Non-probability sampling

 Methods of Analysis:

• Descriptive Statistics

• Textual Analysis

• Cispro and SPSS

• Automate WDRP software

WEREDA

SUMMARY DISASTER RISK PROFILE

INFORMATION

Wereda Disaster Risk Profiling Programme: SNNP

Disaster Risk Profile: Hamer Wereda

SUMMARY OF WEREDA PROFILE LIVELIHOOD ZONE SUMMARY

Drought is the major disaster risk in Hamer  Southern Agro-Pastoral Livelihood

Wereda followed by livestock diseases and

Zone (SAP) LZ

crop pests/diseases, together affecting the Crop and livestock production is the

livelihood of more than 85% of the main livelihood activity. The crops

population. Human diseases (mainly water grown are sorghum, maize, and some

borne diseases), floods (due to overflow of teff for sale. But there is still a main

rivers) and conflicts over land, pasture and dependence upon livestock and their

water with different ethnic groups are also products.

among the hazards in the area.

Deforestation, soil erosion and range land  South Omo Pastoral Livelihood

degradation are the major environmental

Zone (SOP) LZ

problems in the area.

This is a semi-arid rangeland zone in

the basin of the Omo River. The main

For Hamer Wereda, enhancing utilization of livestock species reared in this

irrigation and improved agricultural inputs in livelihood zones include goats, cattle

crop production, controlling deforestation and sheep. Although the economy is

and improving natural resource conservation based on livestock, there is some

are the major interventions required in the cultivation of sorghum and maize on

area. Improving access to markets and the valley bottom, using both rainfall

veterinary services and resolving conflicts and irrigation.

are also required in the area.

MAJOR DISASTERS REPORTED IN WEREDA

Kebele

Hedbak

Shanko

Dega keja ala

Kara korcho

Shanko

Miresha kuluma

Minogelty

Erbore gonderoba

Murale

Kolakeja

Erbore

lula

Eriya umbule

Miresha bitagelefa

Gedbak

Assile

Wongabayeno

Disaster 1

Drought, hunger

Drought

Pasture and food

grain shortage

Drought

Livestock disease

Drought

flood

Drought

flooding

Drought

Drought, hunger

Drought

Disaster 2

Livestock disease

Conflict

Livestock disease

Conflict

Drought

Livestock disease

Conflict

Crop pest

Livestock disease

Drought

Livestock disease

Disaster 3

Crop pest

Human diseases

Human disease

Shoats disease

Human diseases

Livestock disease

Conflict

Livestock disease

Conflict

Livestock disease

Crop pest

Global warming

Human diseases

Crop pest

Conflict

LIU Info

Chronic

Hazards:

Proportion of households by major disasters

suffered in the last five years

SAP LZ:

Drought;

livestock

diseases and

malaria

SOP LZ:

Drought;

livestock

diseases;

malaria and

market shocks

SHORT NARRATIVE ON MAJOR DISASTERS: drought, livestock diseases and crop pests are the three major disaster risks reported in Hamer Wereda,

among which, drought is the most problematic hazard resulting in crop damage and hunger in the area. It also affects livestock production by limiting water

and pasture availability in the area. On the other hand, disaster effects from flooding such as high soil erosion, loss of assets, crop damage and migration are

reported increasing. Livestock diseases (such as trypanasomiasis, CCPP and faculiasis) are also potential hazards to livestock rearing, which is the main

livelihood activity in the area. Availability of poor quality livestock drugs and invasion of noxious plants and weeds on grazing areas in the community are

reported additional problems worsening the situation in livestock production. Moreover, conflicts over grazing areas and water sources are very common in

Hamer Wereda particularly between different clans and ethnic groups. In this area, conflict has become the main reason for household migration and change

of residence and also in loss of life and assets. Taking revenges and looting to replace looted animals makes the conflict even worse in the area.

Disasters

Drought

Livestock

diseases

Crop Diseases

Human

disease

Floods

Conflicts

EFFECT OF DISASTERS

Loss 1

Physical damage on household

members and property

Livestock damage

Loss 2

Crop damage

Illness in livestock

Crop damage

Health problems

Migration

Loss of access to social

services

Loss of access to social

services

Loss of access to social

services

Loss of life and asset

Loss 3

Livestock damage

Loss of income and

saving

Loss of income and

food

Death of household

members

Damage to crops

and pasture

Loss of saving

Wereda Disaster Risk Profiling Programme: SNNPR

Disaster Risk Profile: Hamer Wereda

HOUSEHOLD AND COMMUNITY

VVUULLNNEERRAABBIILLIITTYY

In this Wereda, 4/5th of the households did not recover from the

disasters they faced indicating weak resilience of the community.

Livestock rearing is the main livelihood activity followed by crop

production and bee keeping. January (Tir) is the most problematic

month in terms of water and pasture availability for livestock. During

the same period, water availability for human consumption is also very

scarce.

The exposure of the community to hazards is reported increasing

because of deforestation, degradation of other natural resources and

conflict with Dasenech. Households’ dependence on traditional,

subsistent and rain fed agriculture including heavy dependence on

single enterprise (livestock), focus on few non-cash crops (sorghum

and maize), poor adoption rate of improved technologies (such as

seeds, fertilizer, pesticides), poor utilization of irrigation facilities and

improved agronomic practices are generally the major factors

enhancing households’ vulnerability towards major disasters in the

Wereda. During the time of survey, 62% and 89% of the households

reported receiving food aid and agricultural inputs.

Most Problematic Months for Pasture & Water Availability for Livestock

Accessibility:

 Road: about 71% of the households reported to have no access to road. On average, it took households 70 minutes to reach the nearest paved road

 Electricity: all kebeles do not have access to electricity

 Agricultural inputs: 97% and 92% of the households did not use fertilizer and pesticide respectively. On the other hand, 54% of the households have

used improved seed varieties, and 87% of the households reported receiving agricultural extension service.

 Urban centre: household access to urban centre is very poor. It took households almost five hours to reach the nearest urban centre.

 Water: river stream is the main source of water, from which 58% of the households obtain water for households’ consumption. On average, it took

households about 49 minutes to fetch water.

 Access to sanitation: of the total households surveyed, 92% of them reported that they have no toilet facility.

 Veterinary facilities: Majority of households (more than 78% of them) reported to have poor access to veterinary services and livestock drugs

 Access to market: Access to market is very poor, and the communities indicated that grain traders bring crops (mainly sorghum) to their area and

exchange 50 kg sorghum with one goat (which is estimated to be Birr 400).

Level of Awareness and Institutional Development

The general literacy level of the Wereda is very low, where, of the total population above 7

years of age, only 4.8% of them are literate out of which 92% did not complete first grade level.

With regard to gender parity in education, the number of male to female students is almost

equal below first grade level indicating women’s equality and even better participation in

education with men at the beginning. However, as the education level attained gets higher, the

number of males by far dominates the corresponding number of females. This implies the

majority of females discontinue their education even before completing first grade and many of

the remaining females dropout as the level gets higher.

On the other hand, awareness of the community on disaster risk management system and

actors seem to very poor. There are various cooperatives and associations engaged in different

activities including helping members during disasters. These include purchasing cooperatives,

women associations, youth groups and farmers’ multipurpose cooperatives. Presence of NGOs

like GTLI (Global Team for Local Initiatives) and Farm Africa is additional capacity in the area.

InfoBits:

Population

Sex ratio

Urban Population

Mean Altitude

Mean Slope

: 59160 (2007)

: 992 F/1000 M

: 3210 (2007)

: 787.153 m

:2.91%

Measles caseload

PLWHA on ART

Under-five children eligible

for supplementary feeding

: 3 (2004-2009)

Sources: Various Secondary Sources

Community Capacity to Cope

 Collection of wild food, selling more livestock and reducing the number of meals eaten per a day are the major coping mechanisms used by households

in the Wereda. Poaching and park encroachments are also among the coping strategies used by households.

 In time when more resources are available, households opted for storage of more foods and other necessities (by 86% households) and adaptation of

economic activities to hazards season (by 12% households) as the major coping mechanisms to disaster effects

 Households’ access to credit from formal credit institutions is almost negligible. Only 1.1% of the households interviewed in Hamer Wereda reported

obtained credit from relatives, friends and neighbours and all of them used it for consumption purposes

 Good traditional cooperation and participation is available in the community to help each other in time of disaster

 There is possibility of livelihood diversification in terms of growing food and cash crops by using irrigation. Average land holding in the area is high

(which is 3.74 hectares) but average land actually cultivated is very low (which is 0.77 hectare) indicating availability of more land for crop cultivation.

 Of the total surveyed households, 89% of them have received formal transfers in the form of seeds and tools which shows good intervention that can

enhance their capacity to cope with disasters in the future

 Better income can be obtained from tourists visiting the area and invested towards building the capacity of the community towards preventing

disasters.

 Major crops grown in the area are sorghum, maize and pulses, while types of livestock reared by households include cattle, goat, sheep and donkey.

WDRP Indicators

Hazard Related Characteristics

Wereda

Disaster Risk

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Biological Hazards of the Wereda

Wereda

HAMER

Hazard_Name

Hazard_Sub_Type

Crop pest

Cause_Of_Hazard

Crop pest

Late sowing due to shortage of rain

Hazard_Sub_Type

• Malaria,

• Chronic fever

• Diarrhea

• Meningit

Hazard_Sub_Type

• Tryponosomiasis,

• CCPP,

• Ticks,

• Foot and Mouth

• Mangitis

• CBPP

Human diseases

Lack of health services in the PA ,

Lack of mosquito net,

Lack of sanitation and dependent on

livestock produce for consumption

Livestock disease

Lack of vaccination and treatment,

Regular mobility due to feed and water

shortage

Unrestricted livestock movement for

grazing and water point, Mingling of

Hamer goats which have come for

grazing due to shortage of pasture at

hammer area,

Lack of veterinary facilities,

Effects_Of_Hazard

Food shortage,

Hunger,

Additional expenditure for food grain by

selling livestock

Death,

Loss of body condition,

Discomfort

Death of livestock,

Reduce of livestock produce,

Food shortage,

Low livestock price

Page 1 of 1

Wereda

Disaster Risk

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Geological Hazards of the Wereda

Wereda

HAMER

Hazard_Name

Hazard_Sub_Type

No geological hazard

Cause_Of_Hazard

Geological Hazards

Effects_Of_Hazard

Page 1 of 1

Wereda

Disaster Risk

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hydro Metrological Hazards of the Wereda

Wereda

HAMER

Hazard_Name

Hazard_Sub_Type

Drought

Cause_Of_Hazard

Hydro-Meteorological Hazards

Deforestation,

Rainfall shortage

Flood

global warming (increasing

temperature)

High rain fall at high land areas,

Overflow of Omo and Woito Rivers

Living and farming alongside rivers

Deforestation and

Reduced rain fall

Effects_Of_Hazard

Hunger ,

Shortage of water and pasture

Long distance mobility in search of food

grain

Crop damage,

Damage of household properties,

Displacement,

Water lodging of pasture land

Increased sun stroke,

Loss of pasture, water, bushes, shrubs,

and large trees,

Reduced honey production ,

Reduced livestock produce

Page 1 of 1

Wereda

Disaster Risk

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Socio Economic Hazards of the Wereda

Wereda

HAMER

Hazard_Name

Hazard_Sub_Type

Conflict

Cause_Of_Hazard

Social Hazards

Competition over pasture and water

sources,

Looting of livestock,

Taking revenge

Conflict with Dasenech Wereda, Borena

and with different ethnic groups with in

Effects_Of_Hazard

Loss of livestock,

Loss of life,

Instability

Loss of grazing land

Page 1 of 1

Wereda

Disaster Risk

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Technological Hazards of the Wereda

Wereda

HAMER

Hazard_Name

Hazard_Sub_Type

No technological hazard

Cause_Of_Hazard

Technological Hazards

Effects_Of_Hazard

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

ASELE

Droughts

December

February,

March, May,

June, July,

August

1967;1977;1

985;1987;19

84;1986;200

0;2001

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

Trends of

Effects

1986

Increased

Root Causes

shortage of

rain

Effects

Vulnerability

Hunger,

sell of

livestock,

death of

livestock,

and

reduce of

livestock

produce,

loss of

body

condition

Unfavourabl

e location

for rain fed

agriculture,

lack of

awareness to

use livestock

resources

Coping

Strategy

Selling

shoats to

purchase

grain,

exchanging

grain for

shoats, use

of wild

fruits,

leaves and

roots,

taking loan

from rich,

begging

from rich

relatives

Page 1 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

ASELE

Livestock

diseases

February, Jan,

April , march,

June

1984;1987;1

992;2001;20

Conflicts

February,

January,

august

1984;1997;2

000

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1984 for

CCPP, 2000

for sheep

Trends of

Effects

Increased

1984

Decreased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Continuous

movement in

search of

grazing, lack

of routine

animal

health

service

Reduce of

livestock,

death of

livestock,

livestock

price fall,

hunger

due to

fall of

livestock

market

Lack of

awareness

on disease

prevention

and control

methods,

unrestricted

livestock

movement

for search of

grazing

Comptetion

over grazing

land, looting

of livestock,

killing for a

revenge

livestock

rustling,

loss of

life,

instability

and

shortage

of grazing

Regular

mobility in

search of

grazing and

water points

due to

pasture

shortage,

cultural

influence

Coping

Strategy

Changing

grazing and

water

points, split

herds in to

different

grazing

points,

keeping a

number of

livestock to

reduce risk

Regular

scouting of

borders,

shifting of

grazing

points

during

conflict,

strong

cooperation

of all PA

community

to confront

rival ethnic

groups

Page 2 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

ASELE

Crop Pest

June

1998;2002

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

Trends of

Effects

2002

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Late sowing

due to delay

of belg rain

Reduce of

crop

produce

and total

loss of

yield

especially

in 2002

increasing

hunger

seasons,

sell of

shots

Low

awareness to

use

pesticides

Coping

Strategy

Page 3 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

ERBORE

Floods

May, October

1999;2002

Droughts

January, fib,

Dec, June, July

1998;2000;2

001

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

2002

Trends of

Effects

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Settlement

near river

side,

increasing

deforestation

Damage

seedlings

crops,

damage

on grass

land

Dependency

on flood

threatened

agriculture,

settlement

beside the

river

2001

Increased

Low rain fall

at high land

areas

Displacem

ent,

damage

of crop

seedling,

shortage

of water,

shortage

of grazing

Dependency

on flood

threatened

agriculture

Coping

Strategy

Use of

indicators

and

evacuating

livestock

(cultural

indicators)

i.e.,

unusual

sound of

crocodiles

and

movement

to unusual

places

Sell of

shoats

during food

shortage

seasons,

use of wild

fruits,

fishing in

Woito river

Page 4 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

ERBORE

Livestock

diseases

January,

February,

December,

April

1967 for

RP;1984 for

CCPP;2000

Crop Pest

September,

October

1999;2002

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1967 for

rinder pest,

1984 for

CCPP

Trends of

Effects

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Unrestricted

movement

and lack of

frequent

vaccination

Death of

livestock,

familiarit

y of

prices,

hunger

due to

livestock

loss

Low

awareness

on disease

control and

prevention,

regular

mobility in

search of

grazing

1999

Increased

Un timely

sowing

Damage

of crop

(sorghum)

, reduced

crop

produce

Dependency

on flood

retreat

agriculture

Coping

Strategy

Split herds,

keeping a

number of

livestock to

reduce risk,

frequent

shifting of

grazing and

water

points

Smoking

farms

Page 5 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

ERIYA

Droughts

February,

march, may,

June,

September,

October

1977;1986;1

991;1998;20

00;2001

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1998

Trends of

Effects

Increased

Root Causes

Shortage of

rain

Effects

Vulnerability

Reduce of

livestock

produce,

crop

damage

every

year, long

distance

mobility

in search

grazing,

hunger

and

livestock

sale

unfavourable

location for

rain fed

agriculture

Coping

Strategy

Use of wild

fruits and

leaves for

food,

migration

and using

national

parks and

restricted

areas for

grazing,

selling

livestock to

purchase

grains

Page 6 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

ERIYA

Livestock

diseases

Jan, February,

march, April,

may, June,

October

1967 RP,

1984 CCPP,

2000 sheep

disease 1993

anthrax

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1967

RP,1984

ccpp, 2000

sheep

disease

1993

anthrax

Trends of

Effects

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Regular

mobility in

search of

grazing, lack

of awareness

for

prevention

and control

method

Death of

livestock,

livestock

price fall,

hunger

and loss

of asset

Regular

mobility for

search of

grazing and

watering

points

Coping

Strategy

Tending a

number of

livestock to

reduce

death risk,

split

herding to

reduce

disasters,

restrict

movement

to disease

source

areas

Page 7 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

ERIYA

Droughts

all months

become hot

1999;2000

and on

wards

GEDBAK

Droughts

January,

February,

March, June,

July, August,

September

1984;1996;2

000;1977

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

On wards

1999

Trends of

Effects

Increased

1986;1977

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Deforestation

and reduced

rain fall

Shortage of

rain at belg

season

Drought,

lack of

pasture

and

browsing

bushes,

shrubs,

and large

trees,

reduced

honey

productio

reduced

livestock

produce

Hunger,

long

distance

mobility

for search

of food

grain

Unfavourabl

e location

and keeping

many

livestock

which has

been

becoming

the main

cause of

range land

shortage and

land

degradation

and

deforestatio

Dependency

on rain fed

agriculture,

unfavourable

location

sustainable

for farming

Coping

Strategy

Rotational

grazing for

pasture

problems,

driving

livestock

down to

Omo river

Use of wild

fruits and

leaves, sell

of shoats,

food grain

borrowing

from

vicinity

parent

relatives

Page 8 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

GEDBAK

Livestock

diseases

January,

February,

March, April

1967;1984-c

cpp;2000

Crop Pest

May, June

1998;1985;1

995

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

Trends of

Effects

1984

Increased

2002

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Lack of

vaccination

and

treatment,

regular

mobility due

to feed

shortage

Death of

livestock,

reduce of

livestock

produce,

food

shortage,

fail of

livestock

price

low

awareness

for livestock

management

, lack of

animal

health

service in

the PA

Late sowing

due to

shortage of

rain

Food

shortage,

hunger,

additional

expenditu

re for

food grain

Low

awareness to

use

pesticides

Coping

Strategy

Purchasing

drugs from

shop

keepers

(illegal),

purchasing

drugs from

veterinary

drug

venders

which are

located 42

to 56 km

from the PA

Smoking

crop farm

Page 9 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

KOLA KEJA

Droughts

January,

February,

March

1997;1995;2

000

Livestock

diseases

February,

April, May

1999;2000;1

984;1996

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1999

Trends of

Effects

Increased

1984 for

goats 2000

for sheep

Decreased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Rain shortage

,depletion of

grazing land

Increase

livestock

movement

for grazing,

lack of

veterinary

services, lack

of awareness

for

veterinary

services

Death of

cattle,

reduce of

livestock

produce,

hunger

(crop

failure),c

onflict for

grazing

competiti

Death of

cattle,

goats,

sheep

reduce of

livestock

produce

Livestock

produce

livelihood,

dependency

Lack of

awareness

for

vaccination,

increased

mobility in

search of

pasture and

water for

livestock

Coping

Strategy

Taking

livestock to

distant

areas for

grazing

Split herds

to reduce

diseases

distribution

and loss by

diseases,

change of

grazing

points

during

disease out

breaks

Page 10 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

KOLA KEJA

Conflicts

January,

February

1999;1993;2

000

MINOGELTI

Livestock

diseases

October,

November,

march

1984;2000

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1993

Trends of

Effects

Decreased

1984 for

CCPP, 2000

for sheep

Decreased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Completion

for grazing,

livestock

rustling for

livestock

acquisition

Increased

mobility for

search of

grazing to

boarder

areas

(Kenya)

Loss of

life, loss

of grazing

land, loss

livestock

by looters

Death of

shoats,

loss of

asset,

hunger,

food grain

shortage

and price

fall of

shoats

Regular

mobility in

search of

pasture to

boarder

areas due to

pasture land

deterioratio

n, lack of

awareness

on fodder

conservation

for prolongs

dry seasons

Lack of

awareness

on disease

prevention,

livestock

dependency

and

increased

mobility for

grazing

Coping

Strategy

Change of

grazing

areas when

conflict

arises,

replace

losses by

looting i.e.,

Livestock

looting by

looting

Restrict

movement,

isolation of

watering

and grazing

points, split

herds,

change of

grazing

points

Page 11 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

MINOGELTI

Droughts

December,

January

,February

1967;1977;1

998;2001

MRSHA

Droughts

December,

January,

February,

September

1997;1987;2

001

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1967 for

elders, and

1998 for

this adult

hood

Trends of

Effects

Increased

1977

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Deteriorating

of rain fall

Prolonged

dry season,

shortage of

rainfall

hunger,

loss of

livestock,

loss of

asset,

livestock

feed and

water

shortage,

looting(liv

estock)

Hunger,

livestock

death,

reduce of

livestock

produce,

livestock

feed and

water

shortage,

crop

failure

Settlement

at unsuitable

areas for

rain fed

agriculture,

lack of

awareness

about

livestock

market

Dependency

rain fed

agriculture

and livestock

production ,

lack of

awareness

for livestock

market

Coping

Strategy

Use of

livestock

blood meal,

wild fruits

and leaves,

goat-grain

exchange

Livestock

sale

(shoats) for

grain,

begging

from well

off, wild

fruits and

leaves,

looting of

livestock

from their

relatives

Page 12 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

MRSHA

Livestock

diseases

April, Jan,

February

1976 (rinder

pest),1992;1

984 for

ccpp,2000

for sheep

Human diseases

May and

June=malaria

1,997

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1984

Trends of

Effects

Decreased

1997

Decreased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Increased

mobility for

search of

grazing due

to drought

They do not

know the

causes but

some said

high

environment

al temp

Death of

enormous

cattle

(rinder

pest

1976),ant

hrax=1992

perishing

goats=ccp

p (1984)

Some

deaths

and more

patients

Continuous

mobility for

searching of

grazing and

lack of

awareness

for fodder

conservation

during good

season

Coping

Strategy

Change of

grazing and

water

points, herd

split

Restrict

movement

of people

to disease

outbreak

areas and

water

points

Page 13 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

MRSHA

Crop Pest

May, June

1983;2002

SHANKO

Livestock

diseases

January,

February,

December

1986;1977;1

998;1997;20

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1983

Trends of

Effects

Increased

1977

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Late sowing

due to delay

of belg rain

Drought

Damage

of crop at

fruit

stage,

hunger,

livestock

sale for

grain

Death of

livestock

reduces

livestock

produce,

hunger,

sell of

shoats,

and

reduce of

income

Unfavourabl

e location

for rain fed

agriculture,

lack of

awareness to

utilize

livestock

resource and

natural

resource

Coping

Strategy

Selling of

livestock

for grain,

use of wild

fruits and

leaves,

driving

livestock to

distant

grazing

areas

Page 14 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

SHANKO

Livestock

diseases

June, march,

February,

January,

December

1967;1984;2

000

Human diseases

April, march

for diarrea,for

gip every

month

no answer

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1984

Trends of

Effects

Increased

no answer

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Increasing

mobility for

grazing and

feed

shortage

Death of

livestock,

reduce of

livestock

price,

hunger,

fall of

price

Low

awareness

for disease

control and

prevention

Lack of

sanitation

and

dependence

on livestock

produce

Loss of

body

condition,

discomfor

Usual

consumption

of livestock

produce, use

of any water

sources

Coping

Strategy

No coping

except

restrict

movement

for grazing

and

watering to

disease

source

areas, bring

livestock

for

treatment

and

vaccination

No coping

Page 15 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

DEGA KEJA

Droughts

January,

February,

March, May,

June, July,

December

1977;1986;1

998;1999;20

Livestock

diseases

January, May,

June, April

February

1967;1984;1

986;1992;20

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1977

Trends of

Effects

Increased

1984

Increased

Root Causes

Shortage of

rain fall

Lack of

animal

health

services in

the PA,

regular

mobility for

search of

grazing

Effects

Vulnerability

Hunger;

reduce of

livestock

produce,

sell of

shoats,

and too

distant

mobility

for

grazing

Death of

livestock,

livestock

price fall,

hunger

due to

price fall

Livestock

produce

dependency

and

unfavourable

location for

rain fed

agriculture

Low

awareness

on livestock

disease

prevention

and control,

unrestricted

movement

for grazing

and water

points

Coping

Strategy

Selling of

livestock

for food

grain,

driving

livestock

for search

of grazing

Split

herding and

keeping a

number of

livestock,

regular

shifting of

grazing and

watering

points

Page 16 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

DEGA KEJA

Human diseases

May, June,

July, February

1977_1988m

alaria,1995

meningits

QUARO

Droughts

January,

February, July,

august, June,

September,

October

1997;1967;1

999;2001

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1995 for

meningsts

and 1981

for malaria

Trends of

Effects

Increased

2002;1999

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Lack of

health

services in

the PA, lack

of mosquito

net

Shortage of

rain fall, un

timely

flooding for

flood retreat

agriculture

Death,

loss of

body

condition,

discomfor

Livestock

and water

shortage,

hunger,

loss of

livestock

for sell of

crop

Lack of

mosquito net

and health

services for

malaria,

dependency

on livestock

produce for

hip

Coping

Strategy

No coping

for human

disease

For

livestock

feed

shortage,

migrating

with

livestock to

pasture

areas,

selling of

shoats and

purchase

grain

Page 17 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

QUARO

Floods

may, October

1999;2002

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1999 EC

Trends of

Effects

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

high rain fall

at high land

areas,

irrigation

from

extension

(deforestatio

Crop

damage,

damage

of house

propertie

displacem

ent,

logging of

pasture

land

Settlement

beside the

river for

suitability of

flood retreat

agriculture

Coping

Strategy

Leave the

area for a

month

(shift

settlement)

after the

incidence

of flooding,

shift

livestock to

flood free

areas

Page 18 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

QUARO

Conflicts

January,

February,

march

1984;1995;1

999;2000

Livestock

diseases

January,

February,

April, October

1968;1984;2

002

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1984

Trends of

Effects

Increased

1984

(CCPP)

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Competition

of grazing

with Borena

pastoralists

increased

mobility for

ccpp and

tryponomiasi

Loss of

human

life,

looting of

livestock,

livestock

feed and

water

shortage,

increased

mobility

and

conflict

with the

other

rival

ethnics

Reduce of

livestock

produce,

death of

livestock,

hunger

Dependency

on livestock

resource and

mobility for

grazing

High

mobility for

search of

grazing and

watering

points, low

awareness

for disease

control and

prevention

methods

Coping

Strategy

Changing

grazing

areas,

looting to

replace

looted

livestock

Frequent

change of

grazing and

water

points;

restrict

movement

to source of

infection

areas

Page 19 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

GEDBAK

Droughts

February,

march, may,

1967;1977;1

986;1997;20

00;2001

LALA

Livestock

diseases

January to

March; and

December to

October

1967 rinder,

1984 ccpp,

2000 and

1993

anthrax

Crop Pest

May, June

2002

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

Trends of

Effects

1977

Increased

1967

rinder,

1984 ccpp,

2000 sheep

disease

Increased

2002

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

shortage of

rain at belg

season

Feed

shortage and

regular

mobility for

search of

grazing due

to disease

source areas

Rain shortage

and un

timely

sowing (late

sowing)

Hunger,

loss of

asset, loss

of body

condition,

sells of

shoats or

total loss

Death of

livestock,

livestock

price fall,

food grain

shortage

and

hunger,

loss of

asset

Food

grain

shortage

Dependency

on crop

production,

unfavourable

location/sett

lement, lack

of shoats for

community

members

Livestock

livelihood

dependency,

shortage of

feed and

regular

mobility for

search of

livestock

feed and

water

Low

awareness to

use

pesticides

Coping

Strategy

Selling

shoats,

begging of

food grain

from

relatives or

friends (

Frequent

change of

grazing

areas, split

herds to

reduce risk

No any type

of coping

mechanism

for crop

pests

Page 20 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

SHESHA GOYKE

Droughts

December,

January

,February,

October

1977;1987;1

998;1990;20

00;2001

Livestock

diseases

December,

January

,February,

April for tick

1984;2000

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

Trends of

Effects

2001

Increased

1984 for

ccpp 2000 f

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

shortage of

rain

mobility for

search of

grazing/to

disease

source

areas(unkno

wn areas)

Hunger,

conflict,

sell of

livestock,

mobility

of search

livestock

feed and

water

Death of

livestock,

hunger,

price fall

of shoats

Settlement

of unsuitable

area for

agriculture,

livestock

livelihood

dependency

Low

awareness

for

prevention

and control

of diseases

Coping

Strategy

Goat-grain

exchange,

mobility for

search of

grazing,

rearing of

many

livestock to

replace

loss, split

herding

Swift

change of

outbreak

areas, split

herding

Page 21 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

BESSA MEJAN

Droughts

January,

February,

March,

December,

September

1997;1999;2

001;1992;19

Conflicts

January,

February,

August,

September

1997;1999;1

985;1987;20

01;(all

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

2001

Trends of

Effects

Increased

1987

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Shortage of

rain

Competition

for grazing,

livestock

looting

Hunger,

livestock

feed

shortage,

death of

livestock,

conflict,

and loss

livestock

Loss of

livestock,

death of

communit

members,

grazing

and water

point

shortage

Livestock

livelihood

dependency,

rival ethnic

boarder

settlement

Livestock

resource

dependency

and grazing

and watering

shortage as

a result of

drought

Coping

Strategy

Exchange

grain for

livestock

produce,

selling of

livestock

for grain

purchase

Changing of

grazing

points when

conflict

arises,

livestock

rustling to

replace loss

by looting

Page 22 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

BESSA MEJAN

Livestock

diseases

April, May

August,

January,

February

1998;1984;2

001;2000

SHANKO 2

Droughts

December,

January,

February

1977;1984;1

998;2000

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1984 for

ccpp, 2000

Trends of

Effects

Increased

Root Causes

Mobility to

source of

disease for

search of

grazing

Effects

Vulnerability

Death of

goats and

sheep

Regular

mobility and

lack of

awareness

on disease

prevention

1984

Increased

The death of

livestock due

to shortage

of rain

Hunger,

livestock

death

Dependency

on rain fed

agriculture

Coping

Strategy

Herd

splitting at

different

grazing

points to

reduce loss,

change of

grazing and

watering

points

during

outbreak

Selling of

high

number of

livestock to

purchase

crop foods,

growing

drought

tolerant

fruits and

vegetables

Page 23 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

SHANKO 2

Livestock

diseases

January ,

February, April

1984;1996;1

999

WENBAYNO

Human diseases

Malaria every

year, tetanus

some times

1995;1996;1

999

Droughts

January,

February,

march

1995

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1984; 2001

Trends of

Effects

Increased

1996

Increased

1999

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Unrestricted

livestock

movement

for grazing

and water

point

Headache

Recurrent

drought or

prolonged

dry, range

land

degradation

Death of

livestock,

reduce of

livestock

productio

Death of

human

beings

loss of

livestock

,conflict

and

movemen

t to

distant

areas

Lack of

awareness

and shortage

of drugs

Lack of

awareness of

awareness

drinking of

water

Lack of

awareness

how to

utilize

livestock

asset

Coping

Strategy

Keeping of

high

number of

livestock to

reduce risk

No coping

for human

disease

Poaching,

use of wild

fruits and

leaves,

exchanging

grain with

shoats,

selling

livestock to

purchase

grain

Page 24 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

WENBAYNO

Livestock

diseases

January,

February

1995

HEDBAK

Droughts

January,

February,

March, June,

July, August,

September

1984;1996;2

000;1977

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1999

Trends of

Effects

Increased

1986;1977

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Range land

encroachmen

t, over

grazing,

livestock

increment,

pasture land

degradation

Shortage of

rain at belg

season

Loss of

livestock

produce

and

productio

encroach

ment of

national

parks and

conflict

Hunger,

long

distance

mobility

for search

of food

grain

Lack of

awareness to

conserve

fodder,

dependency

on livestock

livelihood

only

Dependency

on rain fed

agriculture,

unfavourable

location

sustainable

for farming

Coping

Strategy

Driving

livestock to

distant

areas

where grass

and water

are

available

(even in

park areas)

Use of wild

fruits and

leaves, sell

of shoats,

food grain

borrowing

from

vicinity

parent

relatives

Page 25 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

HEDBAK

Livestock

diseases

January,

February,

March, April

1967;1984-c

cpp;2000

Crop Pest

May, June

1998;1985;1

995

ADAMIE

Droughts

August

1999;2001

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1984

Trends of

Effects

Increased

2002

Increased

1999

Decreased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Lack of

vaccination

and

treatment,

regular

mobility due

to feed

shortage

Death of

livestock,

reduce of

livestock

produce,

food

shortage,

fail of

livestock

price

Ticks

increased

Late sowing

due to

shortage of

rain

Shortage of

rain falls at

high land

areas for

brim over of

Omo river

Food

shortage,

hunger,

additional

expenditu

re for

food grain

Damage

of crop,

hunger

Low

awareness to

use

pesticides

Dependency

on recession

agriculture

Coping

Strategy

Purchasing

drugs from

shop

keepers

(illegal),

purchasing

drugs from

veterinary

drug

venders

which are

located 42

to 56 km

from the PA

Smoking

crop farm

Fishing,

purchasing

food grain

from money

collected

from tourist

Page 26 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

ADAMIE

Conflicts

October,

November,

December

1997;1998;2

000

Livestock

diseases

January, April

February

1992;1998;2

000;2001

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

Trends of

Effects

1997

Increased

2000

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Competition

for recession

(flood reside)

crop farming,

avenge

killing

Mingling of

hammer

goats w/ch

have come

for grazing

due to

shortage of

pasture at

hammer area

Loss of

life, loss

of crop

productio

n due to

farming

small

farm land

loss of

livestock

(goats

and

sheep)

Farmers

along Omo

River

Coping

Strategy

Farm their

own land

taking

precautions

, farming at

night

Page 27 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

MURALE

Floods

may

,November

1999;2002

Crop Pest

October

1999;2001

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1999

Trends of

Effects

Increased

2001

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

High rain fall

at high land

areas,

farming

alongside

Woito river,

deforestation

Un timely

sowing,

(delay on

sowing due

to untimely

flooding)

Displacem

ent,

damage

of crop,

damage

of house

utensils,

logging of

grazing

places,

malaria

Crop

damage;

reduce of

crop

produce,

hunger,

sell of

shoats for

crop

Living and

farming

alongside

rivers

Dependency

of flood

recession

agriculture

Coping

Strategy

Shift

temporary

settlement

areas in the

same pa,

shifting

livestock to

flood risk

free areas

Re-sowing

after the

flood

retreats,

sell shoats

to purchase

crops

Page 28 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

MURALE

Livestock

diseases

January,

February,

September,

October,

December

1995;1997;1

998;1999;19

84;2000

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1984

Trends of

Effects

Increased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Frequent

mobility for

search of

grazing,

grazing place

beside Woito

river, grazing

at swampy

area

Death of

livestock,

increased

expenditu

re for

drugs,

loss asset,

hunger,

livestock

price fall

Unavailabilit

y of

alternate

grazing

areas

Coping

Strategy

There is no

any coping

mechanism

for

livestock

disease

incidences

except

taking the

sick to

animal

health

services

Page 29 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured

MURALE

Conflicts

January,

February,

1984;1995

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Worst_Year

1984

Trends of

Effects

Decreased

Root Causes Effects

Vulnerability

Killing in

revenge,

competition

for grazing,

for livestock

acquisition

Death

from

family

members,

livestock

raid

(looting),

instability

Sharing

grazing

areas with

rival ethnic

groups,

increased

mobility for

grazing and

dependency

on livestock

production

Coping

Strategy

Frequent

shifting of

grazing

places

when

conflict

arises,

resolve

conflict by

discussion,

foot print

reading to

reduce

attacks

from rival

ethnic ie

Scouting

boarders

and foot

reading(ide

ntify foot

prints of

rival

ethnics to

prevent

livestock

and human

Page 30 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Disaster Characteristics By Kebele

Kebele Name

Disaster_Type

Common Period

Year Occured Worst_Year

Trends of

Effects

Root Causes

Effects

IMPORTANT: The years and months mentoned in this report are according to Ethiopian Calendar (EC).

Vulnerability

Coping

Strategy

life loss)

Page 31 of 31

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Hazards: Conflict as an Issue

KebeleName

HEDBAK

Description_Of_Conflict

There is conflict over farm land and grazing land

resource

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO 2

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

QUARO

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

There is no any conflict over land resources

owing to available vast vacant land resource

There is no conflict for land resource among the

community but there is conflict over farm land

between Gnangatom and Kara community

There is no any conflict among this community

over land other resources

There is no conflict among the community over

land and other resources

There is no conflict among the community over

land and other resources

There is no any type of conflict over cultivating

or grazing lands

There is no any type of conflict over farm land or

grazing land resource in the area

There is conflict over farm land resources due to

shortage of fertile crop land

LALA

For the time being there is no as such prominent

conflict over farm and grazing land resources but

we are afraid of future due to increasing

population and farm extension

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Change_In_Last_Decade

There is great change on the level

of conflict owing to farm land

problems

No change at all

The conflict is on and off and

difficult to forecast about the

situation

No change

No change happens yet

Main_Causes_Of_Conflict

No change since this year

There is great change before 15_20

year’s conflict for farm land was

not usual but now it becomes usual

There is slight change; minor

conflicts are rising for farm land

extension

Page 1 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Hazards: Conflict as an Issue

KebeleName

ERIYA

Description_Of_Conflict

Conflict is not usual among this community over

land and other resources

MRSHA

GEDBAK

WENBAYNO

ADAMIE

MURALE

ASELE

Conflict over farm land resources have started

b/n these five years owing to farm and grazing

land shortage

There is no conflict among the PA community and

vicinity PA over farm land and grazing land

competition except conflict for grazing with

Borena ethnics

There is no conflict for land resource among the

community but there is conflict over farm land

between Gnangatom and Kara community

There is no any type of conflict over cultivating

or grazing lands

There is no conflict among the pa community and

vicinity pa for farm land and grazing land

competition except conflict for grazing with

Borena ethnics

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Change_In_Last_Decade

Increasing theft which is unusual is

the only change among the

community (theft of honey from

bush bee hives)

There was no any type of conflict

over land resources before 10 to 15

years

There is no significant change

Main_Causes_Of_Conflict

The conflict is on and off and

difficult to forecast about the

situation

There is no significant change

Page 2 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator: Hazard Situation During Last Disaster - Characteristics of most recent disasters that affected the community

KebeleName

Types of Disasters

Hazard_Description

Effect_Of_Disaster

Most_Severly_Affected

Reason

HEDBAK

SHANKO

Hunger is the usual

disaster affecting the

community

It has affected all the community

throughout the year until the second

harvest season

Hunger, livestock feed

and water shortage,

livestock production

decrease

Through the year except some

months b/c of rain fall shortage

Hunger, loss of body

condition, sale of

shoats to purchase

grains and long

distance mobility to

beg or borrow food

grains from relatives

or the same clan

Food shortage for

human being,

livestock death,

selling high number of

livestock, hunger,

body loss of human

being malnutrition,

mobility with their

livestock

The poor and elders who

do not have relatives

were the most affected

group

All the groups of the

community

Lack of resource

and lack of strength

to find food grain

either by borrowing

or begging

Because during

drought, the price

of food crops

increases and

livestock product

decreases, and high

dependency on

livestock

production

Page 1 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator: Hazard Situation During Last Disaster - Characteristics of most recent disasters that affected the community

KebeleName

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO 2

Types of Disasters

Food grain shortage,

livestock feed and

water shortage and

livestock disease

Hazard_Description

Food shortage has been occurred in

all communities regardless of income

level for the last seven years except

2002 CCPP and un specific sheep

disease outbreak have affected on

shoat owners for a year( one year)

Drought(food crop,

livestock feed and

water shortage)

All shako kebele community have

been affected through the year

except 6 months that were covered

(supported) by relief food

Effect_Of_Disaster

Loss of shoats, sale of

more shoats for grain,

hunger and loss of

body condition, lack

of resistance,

livestock feed and

water shortage

,dispute among

government officials

owing to poaching and

park encroachment

(Mago park for

grazing)

Hunger, sell of more

shoats to feed

households and poor

relatives, too distant

areas mobility for

search of grazing and

watering points

reduce of income

from honey sell, milk

and products sell

Most_Severly_Affected

The poor who are not

included in PSNP

The poor who are not

include in PSNP and

haven’t wealthy

relatives been affected

severely

Reason

Lack of shoats for

sell to purchase

food grain (for

hunger),availability

of small stock,

Lack of livestock

for sale or lack of

shoats for sale

and/or grain

exchange

Page 2 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator: Hazard Situation During Last Disaster - Characteristics of most recent disasters that affected the community

KebeleName

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

Types of Disasters

Hunger, livestock feed

and water shortage

Hazard_Description

All pa community have been affecting

for more than 10 years by the effect

of drought

Unspecific sheep

disease that introduced

from Kenya and CCPP

Food shortage,

livestock feed and

water shortage and

newly introduced

sheep disease

All shoat owners in the pa are equally

affected all flock for some

pastoralized perished out and remain

without sheep CCPP has the

prevalence of 20 years by on and off

outbreak killing goats the new sheep

disease has also 2 years duration still

with high incidence as though the

incidence of CCPP is reducing

All community were affected by food

shortage and all sheep and livestock

owners were affected by feed and

water shortage and newly introduced

disease almost all year round except

for some months that we got relief

food and support for PSNP for food s

Effect_Of_Disaster

Hunger, more sell of

main livelihood

(livestock for

grain),reduce of

livestock produce and

productivity ,conflict

with rival ethnics

(Dasenech and

Gnangatom)

Reduce number of

shoats which are the

main sources of food

grain, lack of

confidence to resist

drought

Hunger, sell of more

shoats, death of

almost all sheep

population in the pa,

increase mobility for

feed and water,

conflict for

competition for

grazing

Most_Severly_Affected

All were affected by the

effects of prolonged

drought without

exception on level of

living standard

Shoat owners having

small number were the

most affected

The poor were affected

severely except PSNP

beneficiaries whom have

got support for 8 months

in PSNP

Reason

Livestock main stay

dependency and

lack of alternatives

to support livestock

produce to mitigate

hunger, lack of

awareness on

livestock resource

utilization

Keeping small

number of shoats

owing to depletion

of these resources

as a result of

recurrent sells and

exchange for grain

to alleviate hunger

Lack of livestock to

exchange for grain

and or sell for grain

purchase

Page 3 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator: Hazard Situation During Last Disaster - Characteristics of most recent disasters that affected the community

KebeleName

Types of Disasters

Hazard_Description

Effect_Of_Disaster

Most_Severly_Affected

Reason

QUARO

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

Flooding

Drought(livestock feed

shortage and hunger)

44 household heads having 223

families were displaced for 2 months

and more than 450 household heads

crop land was damaged

All pa livestock’s were affected by

prolonged dry seasons for the last

seven years and more except 2002 all

communities were failed short of

livestock produce and food, however

there was food support from the

government

Flooding

All kuyle settlement (44 household

villages) was flooded for 25 days

Displacement for

30_45 days, damage

of crops, logging of

pasture land

Loss of livestock to

purchase food grain

(sell of many

livestock), hunger,

loss of body condition,

reduce of income,

reduce of livestock

produce and livestock

Lack of grazing points,

lack of water for

human, damage of

byre ,restrict usual

mobility

All communities that

settle near Woitor river

were affected without

exception in age and

level of living

Since all the community

livelihood is based on

livestock production, the

effect of drought is for

all, however the poor

are supported by PSNP

All community members

were affected equally

without exception

Settlement beside

the river to utilize

flood reside

agriculture

Livestock produce

and production

dependency and

lack of awareness

on livestock asset

saving during good

seasons were the

main reasons for

these people being

affected in mass

without exception

Page 4 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator: Hazard Situation During Last Disaster - Characteristics of most recent disasters that affected the community

KebeleName

LALA

ERIYA

Types of Disasters

Hunger and livestock

diseases (anthrax,

CCPP, and unspecific

sheep disease still

affecting several sheep

of each herder)

Hazard_Description

Hunger has been affecting all

community for the last seven years

there was also several anthrax

outbreak in 1993 which affected

many livestock including herders at

grazing areas during dry seasons it

has been affected for 3 months

Recurrent drought is

regular disaster of this

community

Food shortage was affecting all the

community in the pa for the last

seven years particularly penniless

who are not included in PSNP

livestock feed and water shortage

has also affected all herds equally for

the last 10 years

Effect_Of_Disaster

Hunger, loss of body

condition ,increased

vulnerability for

malaria attack or

infection ,loss of

livestock selling for

grain, long distance

mobility for search

food grain and

livestock feed conflict

with park scouts owing

to poaching to reduce

hunger, death of more

than 200 cattle

Hunger, sell of more

livestock resource to

mitigate hunger, long

distance mobility for

grazing and conflict in

park areas and buffer

zones

Most_Severly_Affected

The poor herders having

small number of

livestock and elders who

dont have relatives were

severely affected

Aged group, children and

penniless were the most

affected

Reason

Lack of livestock

resource and any

other resource for

grain purchase

herders having

small number of

livestock were also

affected by disease

that has killed 3/4

of his own

It was easy for

young to find food

resources rather

than elders as

hunting and other

activities the

well-being was also

purchasing grain

selling their

livestock resources

Page 5 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator: Hazard Situation During Last Disaster - Characteristics of most recent disasters that affected the community

KebeleName

MRSHA

Types of Disasters

Hunger, livestock feed

and water shortage,

livestock death

(drought)

Hazard_Description

It has affected all the community

regardless of the level of living

standard

GEDBAK

Food grain shortage

was the disaster of this

community

It has been affected all the

community for one year until crop

harvested

Effect_Of_Disaster

Hunger, loss of

livestock asset

(reduce), sell of a

number of shoats to

purchase grain

competition for

grazing with rival

ethnic groups and

flare up of conflict

Hunger, long distance

mobility for search of

food grain,

debilitation, sell of

shoats and total loss,

taking loan beyond

capacity

Most_Severly_Affected

The penniless and

medium class in wealth

were affected most

The poor who are not

included in PSNP and

elders

Reason

The poor didnt have

access for grain

owing to absence of

livestock and the

medium wealthy

class livestock were

affected more

Lack of surplus

asset and lack of

well-being relative

or neighbours that

have surplus

resources

Page 6 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator: Hazard Situation During Last Disaster - Characteristics of most recent disasters that affected the community

KebeleName

ASELE

WENBAYNO

Types of Disasters

Recurrent drought and

livestock disease are

the main constraints of

this community and

also food grain and

livestock feed shortage

and diseases of

livestock

Hazard_Description

We have been affected by food grain

and livestock feed shortage and

livestock diseases for the last 10

years due to shortage and erratic

distribution of belg rain fall

Drought (hunger,

livestock feed and

water shortage)

Shortage of food, livestock feed and

water shortage are our usual

problems for the last 10 years due to

erratic and scant rain fall

Effect_Of_Disaster

Loss of livestock by

selling more for food

grain and death by

feed shortage and

disease attacks ,loss

of body condition and

lack of resistance for

diseases long distance

Most_Severly_Affected

The poor who are not

included in PSNP and

elders

Hunger, sale of

numerous livestock to

meet family food

requirement and

reduce income due to

less productivity of

livestock

The poor who are not

included in PSNP and

elders

Reason

Lack of livestock

resource for grain

exchange and lack

of relative who

could support

them, lack of

strength to travel

too distance areas

either for search of

wild fruits or

begging food grain

from having

Lack of extra assets

and being low

economic class in

the community

Page 7 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor: Frequency of Disaster Occurrence

Wereda HAMER

Conflicts

Crop diseases

Droughts

Economic / Price shock

Floods

Heavy Rain

Human diseases

Landslides

Livestock diseases

Storms / Cyclone/hail storm

45.00

10.00

57.00

92.00

1.00

57.00

9.00

12.00

50.00

29.00

46.00

23.00

26.00

14.00

19.00

50.00

36.00

18.00

16.00

14.00

8.00

63.00

41.00

50.00

36.00

50.00

8.00

28.00

7.00

9.00

14.00

31.00

16.00

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region

S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Selected Indictor:

Household Exposure to Hazards

Wereda

HAMER

Disaster Type

Droughts

Floods

Landslides

General_Exposure

29.00

4.26

0.05

Last_Five_Years_Exposure

31.10

4.55

0.16

Crop diseases

Livestock diseases

Human diseases

Storms / Cyclone/hail storm

Heat waves/ High temp

Conflicts

Economic / Price shock

19.30

26.70

14.10

0.24

0.33

5.50

0.53

20.20

27.10

11.30

0.10

0.36

4.29

0.67

Forest Fires

0.05

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

Zone SOUTH OMO

Months of Occurrence of Frequent Disasters

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Conflicts

Crop diseases

Droughts

Economic / Price shock

Floods

Heavy Rain

Human diseases

Landslides

Livestock diseases

Storms / Cyclone/hail sto

9.76

26.00

7.30

4.88

2.40

3.70

1.20

9.76

15.90

7.30

12.20

1.81

1.00

1.30

15.30

36.00

0.80

1.80

0.26

2.85

1.30

1.55

37.90

38.00

16.00

1.17

1.30

0.20

1.17

1.00

1.20

1.84

12.50

13.00

63.00

13.00

1.10

3.41

22.00

4.50

1.14

12.50

55.00

14.30

43.00

29.00

14.00

4.27

6.60

12.80

23.00

29.00

5.20

3.30

1.90

2.37

3.30

1.90

33.30

33.00

33.30

6.13

21.00

27.00

11.50

18.00

7.90

2.10

1.10

0.38

2.11

1.10

1.15

50.00

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Conflicts: Perception of households on conflict issues - Is conflict an issue in this

community?

Is Conflict an Issue in Community?

Response_Percent

Yes

19.90

80.10

0.00

Is Conflict an Issue in Community?

Yes

19.9

0 0.0%

No 80.1 80.1%

Yes 19.9 19.9%

Total: 100 100.0%

80.1

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Conflicts: Perception of households on conflict issues - Who To Turn To in case of

Conflict?

Who To Turn During Conflict?

Response_Percentage

Family members

0.78

Elders

91.20

Amakaris

0.26

Wereda administration

4.92

Police

2.59

Regional representatives

0.26

Other

0.78

Who To Turn During Conflict?

Wereda administration

Regional

representatives

Police

Other

Family members

Amakaris

Elders

Amakaris

Elders

0 0.3%

91 90.5%

Family members

Other

1 0.8%

Police

Regional representatives

Wereda administration

3 2.6%

0 0.3%

5 4.9%

Total:

101 100.0%

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

Type of Loss

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Losses from Disasters - Losses from all disasters (household response in %)

Main_Loss_Percent

Secondary_Loss_Percent

Physical damages on houses and property

Crop damage

Livestock damage

Death of household members

Illness/health problems

Loss of access to social services, including school

Loss of income

Loss of savings

Livestock were stolen

Lost access to grazing land

Had to flee/change residence area

1.05

42.60

32.40

1.26

15.20

0.58

0.63

1.16

1.84

1.10

1.08

3.65

10.60

0.80

2.63

3.08

42.40

7.59

0.51

19.70

0.91

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

Type of Loss

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Losses from Disasters - Main Losses by Type of Disasters (household response in %)

Type of Disasters which mainly caused Listed Losses

Crop damage

Death of household

members

Had to flee/change

residence area

Illness/health problems

Livestock damage

Page 1 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

Type of Loss

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Losses from Disasters - Main Losses by Type of Disasters (household response in %)

Type of Disasters which mainly caused Listed Losses

Loss of access to social

services, including

school

Loss of income

Loss of savings

Lost access to grazing

land

Lost access to water

source

Page 2 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

Type of Loss

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Losses from Disasters - Main Losses by Type of Disasters (household response in %)

Type of Disasters which mainly caused Listed Losses

Other losses/damages

Physical damages on

houses and property

Page 3 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Losses from Disasters - Secondary Losses by Type of Disasters (household response in %)

Type of Loss

Type of Disasters which caused Listed Secondary Losses

Crop damage

Death of household

members

Had to flee/change

residence area

Illness/health problems

Livestock damage

25.00

92.40

49.70

51.10

0.50

2.60

15.60

0.20

1.40

4.60

1.70

11.10

1.90

40.70

80.00

0.60

7.70

1.10

0.40

82.30

100.00

4.80

0.30

1.60

1.30

28.60

93.60

Page 1 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Losses from Disasters - Secondary Losses by Type of Disasters (household response in %)

Type of Loss

Type of Disasters which caused Listed Secondary Losses

Loss of access to social

services, including school

Loss of income

Loss of savings

Lost access to grazing land

Lost access to water source

25.00

0.20

0.60

49.10

1.00

10.70

16.70

5.70

1.90

5.50

2.40

2.20

0.70

5.50

0.40

20.00

0.30

0.40

0.30

27.50

17.60

0.30

0.20

57.10

1.80

1.30

0.40

Page 2 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Losses from Disasters - Secondary Losses by Type of Disasters (household response in %)

Type of Loss

Type of Disasters which caused Listed Secondary Losses

Other losses/damages

25.00

0.50

0.20

9.30

Physical damages on houses

25.00

3.60

10.10

16.70

31.10

100.00

6.60

and property

2.60

100.00

14.30

Page 3 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Kebele

ADAMIE

Major_Problems /Disasters

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

F - Feb (Yekatit)

G - Mar (Megabit)

H - Apr (Meazea)

Livestock feed shortage, but no water shortage all year

round

Livestock feed shortage and livestock pressure from

Hamer

Livestock feed shortage and livestock pressure from

Hamer

Tick infestation, CCPP and goats’ foot rot

Fishing

1st

Fishing

2nd

Land preparation and sowing when there is belg rain

5th

Sowing and weeding(but not usual)

6th

I - May (Ginbot)

Malaria infestation

Pest guarding (but not usual)

3rd

J - Jun (Sene)

More livestock mobility to kara areas(hammer ethnic

Harvesting(not usual)

9th

livestock)

K - Jul (Hamle)

More livestock mobility to kara areas(hammer ethnic

Fish harvesting

8th

livestock)

L - Aug (Nehase)

More livestock mobility to kara areas(hammer ethnic

Fish harvesting when Omo river filled

7th

livestock)

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Malaria ,food grain shortage, treat of conflict

Land preparation

10th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Food grain shortage, treat of conflict during land

Crop sowing and weeding

11th

preparation

C - Nov (Hidar)

Food grain shortage, treat of conflict during land

Pest guarding (wild life)

12th

preparation, crop pest (wild lifes)

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Crop pest (wild life crop attach=monkey and baboon)

Crop harvesting

4th

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 1 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Kebele

ASELE

Major_Problems /Disasters

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

E - Jan (Tir)

Livestock feed ,water and food grain shortage, conflict

for grazing, tryponosomiasis

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Livestock feed ,water and food grain shortage, food

grain price rise,tryponosomiasis

G - Mar (Megabit)

Tick infestation, mangemites infection, GIP, food grain

shortage

H - Apr (Meazea)

Foot rot, CCPP flare up

Mobility for search of grazing

Land preparation and sowing

Weeding, peak milk and butter yield

Income

Level Rank

11th

12th

5th

1st

I - May (Ginbot)

CCPP infection, food grain shortage

Pest guarding if there is good rain fall

2nd

J - Jun (Sene)

Crop pest(only for good wet season)

Crop harvest if there is good belg rain

3rd

K - Jul (Hamle)

L - Aug (Nehase)

A - Sep (Meskerem)

B - Oct (Tikimt)

High food grain shortage and price rise when crop

harvest failed

Livestock feed and water shortage, food grain shortage

and price rise.

Livestock feed and water shortage, food grain

shortage.

Tick infestation when short rain falls.

Mobility for search of grazing

7th

Mobility for search of grazing

8th

Honey crop harvest and mobility for grazing

9th

Mobility for search of grazing

4th

C - Nov (Hidar)

Livestock feed and water shortage, food grain

shortage.

Mobility for search of grazing

6th

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Livestock feed and water shortage, food grain

Mobility for search of grazing

10th

shortage, and tryponosomiasis.

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 2 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Major_Problems /Disasters

Kebele

BESSA MEJAN

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Hunger ,livestock produce and feed shortage ,crop

Land preparation ,movement for search of grazing

11th

price rise

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Hunger ,livestock produce and feed shortage ,crop

Land preparation ,movement for search of grazing

12th

price rise

G - Mar (Megabit)

Food shortage, livestock food shortage and death of

Crop sowing

3rd

livestock

H - Apr (Meazea)

Flare up of tick infestation, flare up of CCPP, food

shortage gip

Weeding, peak milk and butter yield harvest

1st

I - May (Ginbot)

Crop pest

Peak milk and butter harvest

2nd

J - Jun (Sene)

Crop pest

Crop harvest

4th

K - Jul (Hamle)

Livestock feed shortage

Mobility for grazing

6th

L - Aug (Nehase)

Livestock feed shortage

Mobility for grazing

7th

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Livestock feed shortage

Mobility for grazing

8th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Tick infestation, gip

Milk and butter harvest

5th

C - Nov (Hidar)

Tick and gip

Mobility for grazing

9th

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Livestock feed shortage, livestock produce shortage

Mobility for grazing to distant areas

10th

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 3 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Major_Problems /Disasters

Kebele

DEGA KEJA

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Food grain price rise, reduce of livestock produce,

Land preparation (rare), finding grazing points.

11th

livestock price fall, livestock feed and water shortage.

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Food grain price rise, reduce of livestock produce,

Land preparation (rare), finding grazing points.

12th

livestock price fall, livestock feed and water shortage.

G - Mar (Megabit)

Tick infestation, hip, food price rise.

Land preparation and crop sowing (more than 80%)

6th

H - Apr (Meazea)

Foot rot, food price rises, trypanosomiasis

Weeding ,peak milk and butter yield

1st

I - May (Ginbot)

Malaria, biting flies increase, ccpp increase, crop pest.

Pest grounding milk and butter yield

5th

J - Jun (Sene)

Crop pest during harvest seasons, ticks infestation.

Honey crop harvest, crop harvest (in good season)

2nd

K - Jul (Hamle)

Livestock feed shortage, ccpp, food grain shortage

Mobility for grazing.

7th

when harvest failed.

L - Aug (Nehase)

Livestock feed and water shortage, food shortage.

Mobility for grazing.

8th

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Food shortage, food grain price rise.

Mobility for grazing.

9th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Tick infestation and hip, food shortage.

Milk and butter yield

3rd

C - Nov (Hidar)

Food grain shortage.

Honey crop harvesting.

4th

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Livestock feed and water shortage, food shortage.

Mobility for search of grazing /herders/

10th

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 4 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Kebele

ERBORE

Major_Problems /Disasters

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Water and grazing shortage for livestock

Mobility of livestock feed searching

8th

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Water and grazing shortage for livestock

Mobility of livestock feed searching

9th

G - Mar (Megabit)

Livestock feed shortage,

Mobility of livestock feed searching

5th

H - Apr (Meazea)

Tick infestation

Peak milk and butter yield harvest

6th

I - May (Ginbot)

Flooding, food shortage(for some households)

Peak milk and butter yield harvest

7th

J - Jun (Sene)

Food shortage(for some households)

Land preparation

10th

K - Jul (Hamle)

Food shortage for all households in the community

Land preparation

11th

L - Aug (Nehase)

Food shortage for all households in the community

Sowing, weeding, fish harvesting

12th

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Food shortage for all households in the community

Fish harvesting, pest guarding

4th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Food shortage for all households in the community

Harvesting ,peak milk yield

1st

C - Nov (Hidar)

Tick infestation, gip infection for livestock

Milk and butter yield harvest

2nd

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Gip infection for livestock

Milk and butter yield harvest

3rd

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 5 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Kebele

ERIYA

Major_Problems /Disasters

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

F - Feb (Yekatit)

G - Mar (Megabit)

Livestock feed and water shortage, reduce of livestock

produce, tryponsom

Livestock feed and water shortage, reduce of livestock

produce, tryponsom

Livestock feed shortage, gip, tryponsom

Mobility for search of grazing and watering.

5th

Mobility for search of grazing and watering.

6th

Mobility for search of grazing and watering.

7th

H - Apr (Meazea)

Foot rot, gip

Peak milk and butter yield

2nd

I - May (Ginbot)

Flooding, livestock feed shortage, malaria

Flooding of Woito river which utilized forage.

4th

J - Jun (Sene)

Food grain shortage

Land preparation, fish harvesting.

8th

K - Jul (Hamle)

Food grain shortage

Sowing and land preparation ,fish harvesting

9th

L - Aug (Nehase)

Food grain shortage

Pest guarding and weeding ,fish harvesting

10th

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Food grain shortage, crop pest

Pest guarding ,fish harvesting

11th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Crop pest, flooding threat

Crop harvesting

12th

C - Nov (Hidar)

Flooding threat

Threshing

1st

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Livestock feed and water shortage.

Mobility for search of grazing and watering.

3rd

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 6 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Kebele

GEDBAK

Major_Problems /Disasters

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Livestock feed shortage, food grain shortage, reduce of

Land preparation

11th

livestock produce

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Livestock feed shortage, food grain shortage, reduce of

Land preparation and sowing

12th

livestock produce

G - Mar (Megabit)

Tick infestation, gip infection, food grain shortage

Sowing and weeding

9th

H - Apr (Meazea)

Food grain shortage, foot rot of shoats

Weeding

8th

I - May (Ginbot)

Crop pest

Pest guarding

4th

J - Jun (Sene)

Crop pest

Harvesting

1st

K - Jul (Hamle)

Livestock feed shortage

Threshing

2nd

L - Aug (Nehase)

Livestock feed shortage

No agricultural activity

3rd

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Livestock feed shortage

5th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Tick infestation

Tilling and sowing when short rain fall

6th

C - Nov (Hidar)

Livestock feed shortage

Pest guarding when short rain fall at good amount(rare)

7th

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Livestock feed shortage

No agricultural activity

10th

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 7 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Kebele

HEDBAK

Major_Problems /Disasters

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Feed shortage and leech infestation ,anthrax flare up

Land preparation

11th

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Livestock feed shortage ,food grain shortage, leech

Land preparation and sowing

12th

infestation

G - Mar (Megabit)

Increased tick and mange mites infection

Sowing and weeding

8th

,tryponosomiasis, GIP

H - Apr (Meazea)

Foot rot, CCPP flare up,tryponosomiasis

Weeding

2nd

I - May (Ginbot)

Crop pest, increase tick infestation

Pest guard

4th

J - Jun (Sene)

Crop pest

Pest guarding and harvesting

1st

K - Jul (Hamle)

Crop flare up

Threshing

3rd

L - Aug (Nehase)

Threshing

5th

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Livestock feed shortage

Livestock herding

6th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Tick infestation, GIP

Tilling when short rain fall

7th

C - Nov (Hidar)

Leech infestation

Livestock herding

9th

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Livestock feed shortage and leech infestation

Livestock herding

10th

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 8 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Major_Problems /Disasters

Kebele

KOLA KEJA

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

F - Feb (Yekatit)

G - Mar (Megabit)

Hunger, livestock produce and livestock feed shortage,

loss of livestock

Livestock disease, hunger, livestock feed shortage,

conflict

Livestock disease, hunger, loss of livestock

Land preparation, virtually no livestock produce

11th

Land preparation

12th

Crop sowing

10th

H - Apr (Meazea)

Livestock disease, particularly ticks and mangities

Weeding ,peak milk yield, butter harvest

1st

I - May (Ginbot)

Crop pest, crop failure due to rain fall deterioration

Peak milk yield and butter harvesting

2nd

J - Jun (Sene)

Crop pest

Crop harvesting(it is very rare)

3rd

K - Jul (Hamle)

Hunger when crop harvest fail, livestock feed shortage

Milk yield and butter harvest start to decline

7th

L - Aug (Nehase)

Hunger when rain fall stop in the beginning of may

Less milk yield

8th

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Livestock produce shortage, feed shortage

Less milk yield

6th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Flare up of ticks and mangities ,intestinal parasites

If short rain season starts (there is milk yield)

5th

C - Nov (Hidar)

Ticks and mangities

Peak milk yield and butter harvesting

4th

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Reduce of livestock produce, hunger, livestock feed

shortage

Less milk yield and butter harvest

9th

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 9 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Kebele

LALA

Major_Problems /Disasters

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Livestock feed shortage, food grain shortage, livestock

Land preparation, mobility for grazing.

11th

price fall, tryponomiasis

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Tryponomiasis, anthrax at grazing areas, food grain

Land preparation and sowing

12th

shortage, food price rise

G - Mar (Megabit)

Tick infestation, gip, rain shortage for seedlings

Sowing and weeding

6th

H - Apr (Meazea)

I - May (Ginbot)

Foot rot, tick infestation, tryponosomiasis, food grain

shortage

Food grain shortage, malaria, pest, ccpp

Weeding ,peak milk and butter yield

2nd

Pest guarding ,milk and butter yield

4th

J - Jun (Sene)

Crop pest, ccpp, tick infestation

Crop harvest, honey crop harvest

1st

K - Jul (Hamle)

Livestock feed shortage, food grain shortage,(when

Mobility for grazing

3rd

there is no harvest)

L - Aug (Nehase)

Livestock feed shortage, food grain shortage,(when

Mobility for grazing

7th

there is no harvest)

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Livestock feed and water shortage, food grain shortage

Mobility for grazing

5th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Tick infestation, gip

Honey crop harvest, milk and butter yield.

8th

C - Nov (Hidar)

CCPP, tick infestation

9th

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Livestock feed and water shortage, food grain shortage

Mobility for search of grazing

10th

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 10 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Major_Problems /Disasters

Kebele

MINOGELTI

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

E - Jan (Tir)

Crop price rise, livestock price fall, feed and water

shortage.

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Crop price rise, livestock price fall, feed and water

shortage.

G - Mar (Megabit)

Livestock disease(ticks,mangemites,CCPP)price fall of

shoats, conflict

H - Apr (Meazea)

Flare up of conflict, livestock resulting, tick infestation

Driving livestock to grazing areas

Crop sowing

Crop sowing, peak milk yield

Income

Level Rank

11th

12th

5th

4th

I - May (Ginbot)

Food shortage, grain price rise

Driving livestock to grazing areas

6th

J - Jun (Sene)

K - Jul (Hamle)

L - Aug (Nehase)

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Food shortage, grain price rise

Food shortage and livestock feed and water shortage.

Food shortage and livestock feed shortage.

Food shortage and livestock feed and water shortage.

Driving livestock to grazing areas(it is harvest time

7th

before 15 years)

Driving livestock to grazing areas(it is harvest time

8th

before 15 years)

Driving livestock to grazing areas(it is harvest time

9th

before 15 years)

Honey crop harvest

1st

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Food shortage, CCPP, and CBPP flare up.

Mobility to grazing areas

2nd

C - Nov (Hidar)

Tick infestation, mangmites flare up, conflict, CCPP

Milk yield harvest

3rd

flare up.

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Livestock feed and water shortage, hunger, food price

Mobility to dry season grazing

10th

rise.

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 11 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Kebele

MRSHA

Major_Problems /Disasters

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Hunger, livestock feed and water shortage, conflict,

Trekking livestock for feed and water

11th

death of livestock.

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Crop price rise, livestock price fall, feed and water

Trekking livestock for feed and water

12th

shortage, hunger.

G - Mar (Megabit)

Crop price rise, livestock price fall, tick infestation,

Land preparation

10th

gip infection.

H - Apr (Meazea)

Crop price rise, CCPP flare up, tick infestation,

1st

tryponosomiasis.

I - May (Ginbot)

Crop pest, malaria infection.

2nd

J - Jun (Sene)

Feed shortage, conflict (threat).

3rd

K - Jul (Hamle)

Feed shortage, threat of conflict.

8th

L - Aug (Nehase)

Feed shortage, threat of conflict.

7th

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Feed shortage, threat of conflict.

4th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Tick infestation, gip infection

5th

C - Nov (Hidar)

Gip infection, CCPP

6th

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Conflict, feed shortage ,livestock produce reduction,

9th

hunger

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 12 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Kebele

MURALE

Major_Problems /Disasters

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Livestock disease, livestock feed and water shortage,

Mobility for grazing and watering

11th

conflict

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Tryponsomiasis, livestock feed shortage and conflict

Mobility for grazing and watering

12th

G - Mar (Megabit)

Livestock feed shortage

No agricultural activity

6th

H - Apr (Meazea)

Tick and mangemites infection, foot rot (shoats)

Peak milk and butter harvest

4th

I - May (Ginbot)

Flooding

Peak milk and butter harvest

5th

J - Jun (Sene)

Malaria, food shortage (food grain)

Land preparation(if flooded)

7th

K - Jul (Hamle)

Food shortage(grain)

Land preparation(if flooded)

8th

L - Aug (Nehase)

Food shortage(food grain)

Crop sowing, weeding

9th

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Food shortage(food grain)

Crop sowing, weeding

10th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Food shortage(food grain),crop pest

Pest guarding

1st

C - Nov (Hidar)

Flooding ,CCPP, fasciolosis(gip)

Pest guarding and harvesting

2nd

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Fasciolosis, water shortage owing to dry of Woito river

Pest guarding and harvesting

3rd

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 13 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Kebele

QUARO

Major_Problems /Disasters

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Water and grazing shortage for livestock

Mobility of livestock feed searching

Approved

Data

9th

G - Mar (Megabit)

Livestock feed shortage,

Mobility of livestock feed searching

5th

H - Apr (Meazea)

Tick infestation

Peak milk and butter yield harvest

6th

I - May (Ginbot)

Flooding, food shortage(for some households)

Peak milk and butter yield harvest

7th

J - Jun (Sene)

Food shortage(for some households)

Land preparation

10th

K - Jul (Hamle)

Food shortage for all households in the community

Land preparation

11th

L - Aug (Nehase)

Food shortage for all households in the community

Sowing, weeding, fish harvesting

12th

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Food shortage for all households in the community

Fish harvesting, pest guarding

4th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Food shortage for all households in the community

Harvesting ,peak milk yield

1st

C - Nov (Hidar)

Tick infestation, gip infection for livestock

Milk and butter yield harvest

2nd

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Gip infection for livestock

Milk and butter yield harvest

3rd

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 14 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Kebele

SHANKO

Major_Problems /Disasters

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Feed water for livestock crop price rise, decrease

Mobility to dry season to grazing areas

11th

livestock production

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Livestock feed and water ,shortage food crop price rise

Land preparation and sowing

12th

,decrease livestock production

G - Mar (Megabit)

Tick and infection, high death of livestock

Land preparation and sowing

7th

H - Apr (Meazea)

Infection of tick and tryponosomy

Weeding, good milk and butter yield

1st

I - May (Ginbot)

Crop pest feed root for livestock and mangentites

Weeding for last saving

2nd

J - Jun (Sene)

Crop pest

Pest grounding and harvesting honey

3rd

K - Jul (Hamle)

Block death tryponosomy

No agricultural activities

5th

L - Aug (Nehase)

Common cold for human and tick infection for livestock

No agricultural activities in some year land preparation

8th

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Feed and water shortage in same yrs

Mobility to dry season to grazing areas

9th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Tryponosomy, tick infection and ccpp

Good livestock production

6th

C - Nov (Hidar)

Tick infection

Honey harvesting

4th

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Feed and water shortage in same years, shortage of

Mobility to dry season

10th

livestock production

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 15 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Major_Problems /Disasters

Kebele

SHANKO 2

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Livestock feed and water shortage, food shortage,

Land preparation, mobility for grazing

11th

livestock produce reduce

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Drinking water shortage, food and feed shortage,

Land preparation and sowing

12th

livestock produce reduce

G - Mar (Megabit)

Tick infestation, mangemites , CCPP flare up, gip

Sowing and weeding

4th

H - Apr (Meazea)

Foot rot, mangemites infestation

Peak milk and weeding

2nd

I - May (Ginbot)

Crop pest, foot rot (goats and sheep) malaria infection

Pest guarding

7th

J - Jun (Sene)

Crop pest, food shortage when these are no harvest

Harvesting crop and honey

1st

K - Jul (Hamle)

Livestock feed and water shortage, crop price rise if

Mobility for grazing

6th

there is no harvest

L - Aug (Nehase)

Livestock feed and water shortage, crop price rise if

Mobility for grazing

8th

there is no harvest

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Livestock feed and water shortage, crop price rise if

Honey crop harvest

3rd

there is no harvest

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Tick infestation, CCPP, mangemites infestation, gip

Milk and butter yield(harvest)

5th

C - Nov (Hidar)

Food shortage, tick infestation

Mobility for grazing

9th

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Livestock feed and water shortage, food shortage crop

Mobility for grazing and watering

10th

price rise

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 16 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Major_Problems /Disasters

Kebele

SHESHA GOYKE

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Crop price rise, conflict threats, livestock feed and

Mobility for pasture

11th

water shortage.

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Crop price rise, conflict threats, livestock price fall,

Mobility for pasture

12th

feed shortage.

G - Mar (Megabit)

Food grain shortage ,food grain price rise

Land preparation

10th

H - Apr (Meazea)

I - May (Ginbot)

Tick infestation, CCPP flare up, food grain shortage,

gip

Malaria, food grain price rise.

Sowing expecting harvest, but no yield

2nd

Good milk yield and good price offer for livestock

3rd

J - Jun (Sene)

Malaria, food grain shortage.

6th

K - Jul (Hamle)

Food grain shortage, livestock feed shortage.

Mobility for grazing

7th

L - Aug (Nehase)

Food grain shortage

Mobility for grazing

8th

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Food grain price rise, livestock feed shortage.

Mobility for grazing

5th

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Livestock feed shortage,

Mobility for search of pasture

4th

C - Nov (Hidar)

Tick infestation after 2 to 3 days rains, food shortage.

Honey crop harvest ,good milk yield

1st

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Conflict threat, food shortage, livestock feed shortage,

Mobility for search of pasture

9th

livestock disease

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 17 of 19

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Seasonal Calendar for Hazards, Activities and Income Level By Kebele

Month of Hazard

Major_Problems /Disasters

Kebele

WENBAYNO

Hazard Severity

Rank

Agricultural_Activities

Income

Level Rank

E - Jan (Tir)

Crop price raise, livestock feed shortage, reduce of

livestock produce

F - Feb (Yekatit)

Crop price raise, livestock produce shortage, livestock

feed and water shortage

G - Mar (Megabit)

Crop price rise

H - Apr (Meazea)

I - May (Ginbot)

Livestock disease flare up (ticks and tick born

disease),crop price rise

There is no a such much problems if grain harvest well

J - Jun (Sene)

If there is belg rain no problems ,but not hunger

K - Jul (Hamle)

Hunger, livestock feed shortage

L - Aug (Nehase)

Livestock feed shortage ,hunger

A - Sep (Meskerem)

Livestock feed shortage ,hunger

B - Oct (Tikimt)

Food shortage

C - Nov (Hidar)

Ticks and mangemites infestation

D - Dec (Tahsas)

Livestock feed and water shortage, crop price rises

NOTE: Hazard Severity Rank helps prioritize the more severe hazards that have occurred in the months of disaster occurrence, 3 being the worst and 1

the least severe hazards.

Page 18 of 19

WDRP Indicators

Infrastructure Access Characteristics

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Type of Road

Yes, paved

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Physical Vulnerability: Access to Roads & Urban Centres - Households access to

road and urban centre

Response

Time to Nearest

Paved Road (Mins.)

Time To Nearest

Response Urban Center (Mins.)

14.93 Less than 30 min

50.70 Less than 1 hr

Yes, partly paved road

1.77 30 – 60 min

19.40 1 - 2 hrs

Yes, gravel road

5.62 1 – 2 hrs

10.90 2 - 4 hrs

Yes, dirt road (difficult

for car)

No, no road

5.30 2 – 3 hrs

71.91 3 – 4 hrs

10.40 4 - 6 hrs

4.28 More than 6 hrs

Response

11.86

10.21

29.98

21.58

8.85

Avg Time To Nearest Urban Center(Mins.)

Type of Road

No, no road

Yes, gravel road

Yes, paved

Yes, dirt road (difficult

for car)

Yes, partly paved road

297.40 Avg_Time_To_Nearest_Paved_Road

69.29

Time to reach the nearest paved road from the HH

1 – 2 hrs

2 – 3 hrs

3 – 4 hrs

1 – 2 hrs

2 – 3 hrs

3 – 4 hrs

30 – 60 min

Less than 30 min

30 – 60 min

Less than 30 min

Time to reach nearest urban center from the HH

1 - 2 hrs

2 - 4 hrs

4 - 6 hrs

Less than 1 hr

More than 6 hrs

1 - 2 hrs

2 - 4 hrs

4 - 6 hrs

Less than 1 hr

More than 6 hrs

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Physical Vulnerability: Access to Electricity - Households access and utilization of

electricity

Household_Located_In_Electricity

0.00

Household_Connected_To Electricity

0.00

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Floor Structure

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Physical Vulnerability: Type of Dwelling Units - Households type of dwelling

houses

HH Response

Type of Floor

HH Response

Tin House

0.80

Concrete

0.50

Other losses/damages

98.40

Non-Concrete

99.50

Mobile Home

0.32

0.00

Brick/stone house

0.32

0.00

0.16

0.00

Floor Structure

100

Mobile Home

Tin House

Brick/stone house

Other losses/damages

Floor Structure

Mobile Home

Tin House

Brick/stone house

Other losses/damages

Type of Floor

100

Concrete

Type of Floor

Concrete

Non-Concrete

Page 1 of 1

WDRP Indicators

Socio Demographic Characteristics

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

MRSHA

ERBORE

KOLA KEJA

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Economic Vulnerability: Level of Migration - Migration level and its characteristics by Kebele

Approx_No. Age_Group

Sex

Migration_Period

Migration Trend

Migration_Reason

All age groups

both

male

october and

november

october and

november

october and

november

Increased

Decreased

There is usual

seasonal mobility in

search of grazing and

water for livestock.

The younger groups

move with livestock

to rival ethnic

border areas

(Dasenech and

Gnangatom

weredas). Mobility in

search of grazing is

increasing from time

to time due to

depletion of pasture

land

Destination

Usual mobility for grazing

is to Mago national park,

Benatsemay wereda and

nearby areas to Gnangatom

and Dasenech weredas

Page 1 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

QUARO

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Economic Vulnerability: Level of Migration - Migration level and its characteristics by Kebele

Approx_No.

223

Age_Group

All age groups

Sex

Both

Migration_Period

october and

november

Migration Trend

Decreased

Migration_Reason

There is usual

seasonal mobility in

search of grazing and

water for livestock.

The younger groups

move with livestock

to rival ethnic

border areas

(Dasenech and

Gnangatom

weredas). Mobility in

search of grazing is

increasing from time

to time due to

depletion of pasture

land

Destination

Usual mobility for grazing

is to Mago national park,

Benatsemay wereda and

nearby areas to Gnangatom

and Dasenech weredas

Page 2 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

BESSA MEJAN

HEDBAK

GEDBAK

MINOGELTI

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Economic Vulnerability: Level of Migration - Migration level and its characteristics by Kebele

Approx_No.

Age_Group

All age groups

Sex

male

There is no

migration

history

There is no

migration

No migration

history

Migration_Period

october and

november

Migration Trend

Decreased

Migration_Reason

There is usual

seasonal mobility in

search of grazing and

water for livestock.

The younger groups

move with livestock

to rival ethnic

border areas

(Dasenech and

Gnangatom

weredas). Mobility in

search of grazing is

increasing from time

to time due to

depletion of pasture

land

----

Destination

Usual mobility for grazing

is to Mago national park,

Benatsemay wereda and

nearby areas to Gnangatom

and Dasenech weredas

Page 3 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Household Migration - Household migration and reason

for migration

Duration of Migration

Response Percent

Migration Reason

Response Percent

Two weeks – month

A month – 3 months

3 – 6 months

> 6 months

Less than 2 weeks

15.30

46.80

18.60

0.24

19.10

Family reasons

Looking for work

Working elsewhere

In grazing camp

Visiting

Feeding/IDP camp

Away at school

To beg in urban areas

Other

17.50

0.49

0.25

35.30

0.25

4.69

0.49

36.50

Duration of Migration

> 6 3 – 6 A month Less Two

months months – 3 than 2 weeks –

months weeks month

Duration of Migration

A month – 3 months

> 6 months

Less than 2 weeks

3 – 6 months

Two weeks – month

Migration Reason

000

Away at school

In grazing camp

To beg in urban areas

Migration Reason

Family reasons

Looking for work

Visiting

Feeding/IDP camp

Other

Working elsewhere

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Household Migration - Disasters as a triggering factor for

migration (households response in %)

Is Migration Due to Hazard?

HH Response - Due To Hazard

Yes

Migration partly because of such impacts

94.30

5.70

0.00

Is Migration Due to Hazard?

Yes

5.7

Migration partly because

of such impacts

Yes

94.3

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Demography: Population Structure

KEY:

Male

Female

Children

(0-12 yrs)

Older (Above

55 yrs)

Working

(25-55 yrs)

Youth (12-25

yrs)

ASELE

25%

36%

34%

30%

35%

28%

ERBORE

25%

30%

38%

35%

29%

30%

ERIYA

30%

35%

38%

26%

30%

GEDBAK

25%

32%

36%

24%

34%

KOLA KEJA

30%

35%

32%

36%

28%

LALA

25%

40%

31%

38%

26%

30%

MRSHA

30%

10%

27%

33%

38%

11%

19%

32%

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda

Selected Indicator

Demography: Population Trends and Ethnic Groups

Kebele Name

Population Change Trend

Population Change Reasons

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

HAMER

Ethnic_Groups

HEDBAK

SHANKO

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

QUARO

ERBORE

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

LALA

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

ASELE

Increased

More children

B/c of high birth

More children birth

More birth of children

Birth of more children

More children

Birth of more children

Bena Tsemay

Hamer

Bena Tsemay and

Hamer

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Social Vulnerability: Household Demographic Characteristics - Demographic

characteristics of households

Demographic Indicator

Indicator_Value Comments

Average household size

Sex ratio

943 Number of females per 1000 males

Child sex ratio (under 14 yrs)

909 Number of females per 1000 males

Adult sex ratio (18 & Above yrs)

1,010 Number of females per 1000 males

Dependency ratio ([(0-14)+(64+)] / (15-64)

yrs)

Number of dependants per one economically

active person in the family

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Social Vulnerability: Level of Educational Attainment - Education status of household members

General Awareness

Percentage Educational Level

Percentage

Read and understand text - Easily

1.50

From Proportion of population (7+) - Less than 1st grade

92.40

Read and understand text - with difficulty

2.50

From Proportion of population (7+) - Primary (1-6)

6.27

Can write letters - easily

1.40

From Proportion of population (7+) - Secondary (7-12)

0.76

Can write letters - with difficulty

1.30

From Proportion of population (7+) - Technical

0.04

From Proportion of population (15+) - Primary (1-6)

4.31

From Proportion of population (15+) - Secondary (7-12)

0.92

General Literacy Rate

Proportion of literate population (7+) to total 7+

population

Percentage

4.80

From Proportion of population (15+) - Pursuing or

completed University

From Proportion of population (7+) - Pursuing or

completed University

From Proportion of population (15+) - Less than 1st

grade

Adult Literacy Rate

Proportion of literate population (15+) to total 15+

population

0.05

0.04

94.20

Percentage

3.80

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Social Vulnerability: Gender Parity - Gender parity in education level (7+ years)

and household heading

Educational Level

Less than 1st grade completed

Male_Percent

49.70

Female_Percent

50.29

01-12 Grade completed

87.90

12.14

01-12 Grade completed

76.20

11.76

Technical / vocational certificate or diploma

100.00

23.81

Pursuing University degree

100.00

0.00

University degree or higher

40.00

0.00

Male Head of HH

68.40

Female Head of HH

31.60

Page 1 of 1

WDRP Indicators

Environmental Characteristics

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Environmental Situation: Environmental Problems - Major environmental

problems by Kebele

KebeleName

Problem_1

Problem_2

Problem_3

Problem4

HEDBAK

Deforestation

Soil erosion

Pests

SHANKO

Deforestation

Soil erosion

Pests

DEGA KEJA

Deforestation

Pests

Soil erosion

SHANKO 2

Deforestation

Soil erosion

Pests

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

Range land

degradation

Deforestation

Erosion

Pasture

encroachment

SHESHA GOYKE

Deforestation

QUARO

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

Deforestation

Range land

encroachment

Deforestation

Formation of gullies

by recurrent

flooding

Soil erosion

Deforestation

Pests

Flooding

LALA

Deforestation

Soil erosion

Pests

ERIYA

Deforestation

Soil erosion

MRSHA

GEDBAK

Pasture land

degradation(depletio

Deforestation

Soil erosion

Deforestation

Pests

Increasing

temperature

ASELE

Deforestation

Pests

WENBAYNO

Deforestation

Soil erosion

Pests

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: Deforestation - Observed changes over levels of

deforestation by the community and its problems

Changes_Observed

Problems_Due_To_Changes

HEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

ADAMIE

SHANKO 2

BESSA MEJAN

At current condition

there is no any type

of forest tree at the

mountains and hills

except bushes and

shrubs at some place

High level of

deforestation

2/4 of the PA forest

has been cut down

for settlement and

farm extension

purpose

The level of forest is

decreasing from time

to time owing cut

down for farm

extension and natural

damages

The PA was full of

forest with diversity

of local tree species,

but now more than

3/4 cleared off for

farm purpose and

shifting cultivation

Many large trees are

diminishing due to

increase of cutting

for house

construction at towns

Thick forest areas are

diminished and are

replaced by bushes

and shrubs

Increase environmental temperature, reduce of soil

fertility, and reduce of rain fall

Great valley, loss of soil fertility

Increase environmental temperature, increase run off,

depletion of water resource, depletion of grazing resource

Increase environmental temperature, increase damage of

farm land, formation of unsuitable land scape for water

fetching and livestock watering

Increasing soil erosion, decreasing soil fertility, reduces

honey production, reduce of feed and water shortages

Decrease production of honey, absconding of bee colony

Page 1 of 4

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: Deforestation - Observed changes over levels of

deforestation by the community and its problems

Changes_Observed

Problems_Due_To_Changes

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

QUARO

MURALE

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

Many forest trees

have damaged and

bushes and shrubs

have been replacing

them

The level of

deforestation is

decreasing from time

to time b/c of village

establishment by new

house hold heads

The level of

deforestation is

increasing very

rapidly particularly

beside Woito river

owing to farm

extension (irrigation

farm) both in PA and

other areas

At current condition

there is no any type

of forest even beside

Woito river All places

have become bare

land

However there is

encroachment of

bushes and shrubs the

level of forest trees

decreasing by 75%

There is high level of

deforestation beside

Woito river for farm

extension

Reduce of forest harvest (incense and sum), increase

environmental temperature, reducing of honey production

Increasing environmental temp and wind, shortage of bee

hive hanging trees, decrease of honey production,

absconding due to lack of shade for bee hives

Exposure to un expected flooding, crop land damage, crop

damage, increased environmental temp

Flooding of villages, farm places (un timely flooding),

increasing environmental temperature

Increment of environmental temperature and change of

environment

Unexpected flooding of settlements and damage of farm and

grazing land, loss of moisture for flood retreat agriculture,

damage of large trees, increasing environmental

temperature

Page 2 of 4

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: Deforestation - Observed changes over levels of

deforestation by the community and its problems

Changes_Observed

Problems_Due_To_Changes

LALA

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

There is only 1/4 of

the previously

available dense forest

Virtually all forest

places cleared off for

crop land and

settlement

Before 10 to 15 2/4

of the PA was

covered by dense

forest and it had

been rich in honey

production grazing

and watering points

for the PA herders

and vicinity PAs, but

now it has cleared for

different purposes

There are no large

trees at all which

have been used for

shade for community

and livestock instead

the land is infested

with noxious plants

and bushes It has

reduced by 3/4

Almost 98% of the PA

has become bare and

rocky land due to

continuous

deforestation for

farm extension and

settlement

Formation of up and down land scape, damage of pastures

and crop land, reduces of crop and livestock produce,

reduce of honey produce and increasing absconding

Shortage of pasture land ,feed shortage, increase

environmental temperature, increase soil erosion,

decreased honey production and livestock produce,

increased livestock diseases due to lack of resistance

Exposure to high environmental temperature, high and

untimely continuous wind

Depletion of streams ,shortage of water at peak dry

seasons, increasing leech attack, increasing soil erosion,

reduced soil fertility, reduced pasture land and shortage

Page 3 of 4

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

ASELE

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: Deforestation - Observed changes over levels of

deforestation by the community and its problems

Changes_Observed

Problems_Due_To_Changes

All large trees

diminished and only

small bushes and

shrubs are available

at unsuitable areas

for farm extension

and settlement

Increasing environmental temperature, reduced livestock

produce, increasing soil erosion, damage of pasture and

crop land

Page 4 of 4

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

Environmental Situation: Natural Resources Availability - Natural resources available and changes observed by

the community

SHANKO

Resources_1

Observed_Change_1

Land for grazing

Decreased

Resources_3

Observed_Change_3

Water

Decreased

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

Increase number of livestock and human

population

Forest bee keeping

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Shortage of rain fall

Observed_Change_2

Decreased

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_2

Decrease b/c of rain fall and deforestation

Problems_Changes_4

KebeleName

Resources_1

DEGA KEJA

Grazing land

Observed_Change_1

Almost 75% of the PA grazing land depleted

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

"Shortage livestock feed and long distance

mobility for

Observed_Change_2

Problems_Changes_2

Resources_3

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_4

Page 1 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

Environmental Situation: Natural Resources Availability - Natural resources available and changes observed by

the community

SHANKO 2

Resources_1

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

Forest

At current condition it can be said no

forest

"Increasing soil erosion and reduced soil

fertility reduce

Resources_3

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_2

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_2

Problems_Changes_4

KebeleName

ERBORE

Resources_1

Forest

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

"Forest which was found beside Woito river

Resources_2

Observed_Change_2

Problems_Changes_2

Resources_3

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_4

Page 2 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

Environmental Situation: Natural Resources Availability - Natural resources available and changes observed by

the community

QUARO

Resources_1

Observed_Change_1

Land

There is no shortage of land

Resources_3

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

"There is no shortage of land except

depletion of pasture for

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_2

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_2

Problems_Changes_4

KebeleName

Resources_1

LALA

Forest

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

The pa was full of dense forest but now

clear off

"Increased soil erosion, depletion of water

resources, increased

Observed_Change_2

Problems_Changes_2

Resources_3

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_4

100

Page 3 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator

Environmental Situation: Natural Resources Availability - Natural resources available and changes observed by

the community

KebeleName

HEDBAK

Resources_1

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

Observed_Change_2

There were dense bushes and shrubs on

mountains, but all are deforested for

settlement purposes therefore there is no

fRoeredsutcaenddvosuluitmabeleoflastnrdearemsso,uarcnd

decreasing browses for shoats and soil

fertility and increasing temperature

Resources_3

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_2

Problems_Changes_4

KebeleName

ADAMIE

Resources_1

Water

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

There is high water resource and still no

change on the resource

Resources_2

Observed_Change_2

Problems_Changes_2

Land

There is vast and fertile cultivable land

Encroachment by bushes, shrubs and

hammer livestock due to shortage of pasture

at hammer areas

Resources_3

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_4

Fish

There is plenty of fish resource which is still

untouched

No problem

101

Page 4 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator

Environmental Situation: Natural Resources Availability - Natural resources available and changes observed by

the community

KebeleName

BESSA MEJAN

Resources_1

Grazing land

Resources_3

Water

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

The grazing land is depleting owing to

encroachment

Shortage of pasture, conflict, reduces of

livestock produce, loss of livestock asset

Forest and wild life

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Subsurface water sources is depleting in

temp sandy rivers

Water shortage for livestock and human

beings, mobility for search of water and

prove to conflict

Observed_Change_2

Large trees are falling which were used for

Problems_Changes_2

bee hive hung

Absconding of bee colony, low production of

honey, low income

KebeleName

MINOGELTI

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_4

Resources_1

Browsing and grazing land

Resources_3

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

The grazing and pasture land is degrading

due recurrent drought and over grazing

Shortage of livestock feed and water,

mobility for search of grazing, reduce of

Folirveesstthoackrvpersotduce and productivity

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_2

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_2

Increased conflict due to increased

movement for grazing and watering points,

introducing of new diseases

Problems_Changes_4

102

Page 5 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator

Environmental Situation: Natural Resources Availability - Natural resources available and changes observed by

the community

KebeleName

SHESHA GOYKE

Resources_1

Forest product(incense and gum)

Resources_3

Observed_Change_1

It is diminishing very rapidly

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

Observed_Change_2

Lack of income(incense and gum

income),reduce of honey production,

absconding of bee colony

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_2

Problems_Changes_4

KebeleName

MURALE

Resources_1

Water

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

The water source is diminishing during dry

seasons

Lack of water for livestock and wild life,

too distant travel for search of water

Forest

Observed_Change_2

Problems_Changes_2

May forest places are cleared of for farm

purposes

Flooding and damage of crops

Resources_3

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_4

103

Page 6 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator

Environmental Situation: Natural Resources Availability - Natural resources available and changes observed by

the community

KebeleName

KOLA KEJA

Resources_1

Grazing land

Resources_3

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

Observed_Change_2

Problems_Changes_2

It is deteriorating due to toxic plant

encroachment

Increased mobility for search of grazing

and water reduction in livestock

Inpcreondsuecatinodngaunmd tprreoeduce

It becomes diminishing due to poor

management and indiscriminate cutting

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_4

KebeleName

ERIYA

Resources_1

Grazing land

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

The area was full of pasture but now it is

degraded

Shortage of pasture land, reduce of

livestock production

Forest

Observed_Change_2

Problems_Changes_2

There was dense forest in the pa, but now it

is totally cleared

Decrease environmental temperature,

depletion of water resources

Resources_3

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_4

Cultivable land

There was fertile soil for agriculture before,

but now it is losing its fertility

Frequent shift of grazing land and narrow of

pasture land, loss soil fertility

104

Page 7 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator

Environmental Situation: Natural Resources Availability - Natural resources available and changes observed by

the community

KebeleName

MRSHA

Resources_1

Grazing land

Resources_3

Observed_Change_1

It becomes diminishing from year to year

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

Observed_Change_2

Increased mobility for search of livestock

feed and water, loss of livestock produce

Foarnedstincome

No forest at all in pa

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_2

Change of environmental temp

Problems_Changes_4

KebeleName

GEDBAK

Resources_1

Stream water

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

Observed_Change_2

Problems_Changes_2

There were many spring water points ,but

currently depleting

Shortage of drinking water at peak dry

seasons, increased leech attack for

Folirveessttock ,depletion of spring water points

There was dense forest before 15 years ,but

now there is no any type of forest tree in

Increasing soil erosion, increase wind

the pa

pressure, reduce of crop produce, shortage

of rain, shortage of trees for shade, shortage

of honey produce and absconding

Resources_3

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_4

105

Page 8 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

Environmental Situation: Natural Resources Availability - Natural resources available and changes observed by

the community

ASELE

Resources_1

Grazing and browsing land

Resources_3

Observed_Change_1

Problems_Changes_1

Resources_2

The grazing and browsing land getting poor

owing to over grazing and encroachment of

Long distance mobility for search of

noxious plants

grazing

Forest

Observed_Change_3

Problems_Changes_3

Resources_4

Observed_Change_2

Problems_Changes_2

There is no forest tree at current condition,

but before there was dense forest in the pa

Reduce of soil fertility, increased

environmental temp, reduced honey

production, absconding, and reduced pasture

quality

Observed_Change_4

Problems_Changes_4

106

Page 9 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: Rainfall & Temperature - Observed changes on rainfall and temperature by the

community over the last decade

Rainfall

Temperature

Kebele Name

HEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO 2

Changes Observed Problems

Low

Crop damage, hunger, low income

Low

The rain fall

condition has

been decreasing

in the last 10

years

The rain fall

condition is

deteriorating from

year to year

before 10 years

the main rain

(belg rain)was for

2 and 1/2 months

but now it does

not stay more

than 20 days

Shortage of livestock pasture

Shortage of pasture and water

points, damage of crops and hunger,

damage of forest

Damage of crop at flowering stage,

depletion of sub surface water,

shortage of feed and water, increase

crop pest infestation

Changes Observed

Problems

High

Depletion of water sources, damage on

bushes and shrubs

Damage of water points

Increasing from

year to year

Dryness of watering sources and damage

on plants

It is increasing

every year

High environmental temperature, dry of

pasture and browses with on a short

period of time after rain

107

Page 1 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: Rainfall & Temperature - Observed changes on rainfall and temperature by the

community over the last decade

Rainfall

Temperature

Kebele Name

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

Changes Observed Problems

The rain fall

condition is

deteriorating from

year to year

before 10 years

the main rain

(belg rain)was for

2 and 1/2 months

but now it does

not stay more

than 20 days

Shortage of pasture, shortage of

water in temporary sandy rivers crop

damage, loss of asset, in ability to

save asset (livestock resource), and

loss of honey production

"It could be said

there is no rain in

the pa for the last

5 to 6 years, but

this 2002 etc

there was better

rain fall as

At this time it can

be say ,there is no

rain throughout

the year

Selling goats to purchase grain and

resource diminishing from time to

time, degradation of range land,

depletion of water sources

Changes Observed

Problems

It is increasing

every year as well

also

"Increased sun burn, dry of pasture within

a short period of time, depletion

Increasing from

year to year

High environmental temperature,

depletion /or diminishing of water

resources

108

Page 2 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: Rainfall & Temperature - Observed changes on rainfall and temperature by the

community over the last decade

Rainfall

Temperature

Kebele Name

QUARO

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

Changes Observed Problems

The level of rain

fall is reducing

from time to time

due to unknown

cases

Shortage of livestock feed

It can be said, the

level of rain fall

changed by

(decreased)

threefold of the

previous level of

rain fall

"Sale of a number of livestock for

grain,

The rain fall

condition is

affected too much

within this ten

years

"Reduce of livestock produce; reduce

Changes Observed

Problems

Increasing from

year to year

"High sun burn, dryness of grasses and

browses in short period of time after

109

Page 3 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: Rainfall & Temperature - Observed changes on rainfall and temperature by the

community over the last decade

Rainfall

Temperature

Kebele Name

LALA

ERIYA

MRSHA

Changes Observed Problems

"It can be said no

rain when

compared with

the previous

condition before

15 to 20 years it

was raining for 60

to 65

The rain fall

condition is

becoming erratic

and its

distribution

become un even

in the same PA

"The belg rain used to start

mid-February

"The level of rain

fall is reducing

from time to time

its distribution is

also uneven there

is also high

seasonal

Changes Observed

Problems

110

Page 4 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: Rainfall & Temperature - Observed changes on rainfall and temperature by the

community over the last decade

Rainfall

Temperature

Kebele Name

GEDBAK

Changes Observed Problems

The rain fall

condition has

become erratic

and deteriorating

year to year

"Damage of crop at seedling stage,

shortage

Changes Observed

Problems

111

Page 5 of 5

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

Environmental Situation: Reasons for Environmental Changes

Reason_For_Environmental_Changes

GEDBAK

SHANKO

SHANKO 2

MRSHA

MINOGELTI

ERBORE

KOLA KEJA

QUARO

ERIYA

Increased population and its consequences (increasing settlement, farm

expansion, deforestation far from expansion)

Deforestation, increasing the number of livestock population, increasing

the number of human population b/c of high birth

Deforestation, farm expansion owing to increasing population and

settlement Pasture and browsing plants degradation by over grazing

Deforestation, over grazing of pasture land, settlement increment is the

main causes of environmental change in the area

Deforestation, increased population(increased settlement),recurrent

drought and over grazing, farm practice without yield is also another cause

Irrigation farm expansion in low and high lands beside Omo river is the

main case for environmental changes other area

Deforestation, pastoral land degradation, expansion of farm land without

yield, over grazing due to increasing livestock number, increased

settlement due to increasing population

Irrigation farm expansion and its consequences (deforestation and over

utilization of woito river)

Deforestation, over grazing

ASELE

Deforestation, increasing human and livestock population

HEDBAK

ADAMIE

Increased population and its consequences (increasing settlement, farm

extension, deforestation far from extension)

Over grazing of the area by hammer ethnic livestock’s

MURALE

Deforestation

MRSHA

change of rain fall scanty rain shower and untimely raining, deforestation

and soil degradation

112

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

Environmental Situation: Soil Erosion - Observed changes on levels of soil erosion

by the community

Changes_Observed

Problems_Observed

HEDBAK

High

Reduce of crop produce, farm land and pasture land

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO 2

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

QUARO

KOLA KEJA

High during rainy

season

The level of soil

erosion is increasing

from season to season

The level of soil

erosion is increasing

many farm and

pasture places are

exposed for soil

erosion

The level of erosion is

increasing from time

to time due to

deforestation

"There is such

anticipated soil

erosion change due to

deterioration of rain

fall and

High

The land scape is

plain, which is not

exposed to soil

erosion

High

Loss of soil fertility

"Damage of farm places, damage grazing places, loss of

fertile soil at farm places,

Damage of farm places, damage of pasture land,

deforestation for farm shifting

Damage of crop and grazing lands

There are eroded places on grazing points different from

the previous yrs

Many grazing places become unsuitable for grazing and

pasture land

113

Page 1 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

ERBORE

LALA

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

ASELE

Environmental Situation: Soil Erosion - Observed changes on levels of soil erosion

by the community

Changes_Observed

Problems_Observed

"There is no as such

anticipated level of

erosion owing to plain

land, all places on

The land scape is

plain, which is not

exposed to soil

erosion

"Reduce of soil fertility; reduce of crop production,

formation of gullies and gorges

High

"Damage of farm and pasture land, frequent farm land

shifting and bush clearing

At least 1/4 of the PA

land is eroding, there

is high run off at the

time rain shower

Many pasture lands become gullies and caused feed

shortage

There is high soil

erosion

Reduce crop produce, formation of gullies and gorges at

farm places

The level of erosion is

increasing from time

to time

Reduced fertility of land, formation of gullies and gorges

114

Page 2 of 2

WDRP Indicators

Livelihood, Occupation and Source

of Food Characteristics

115

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Major Occupational Categories - Major categories of occupation and percent of population

engaged in the occupation by Kebele

Occupational Categories and Percent of Population engaged within these occupational categories

Percent (%) of Population

KebeleName

Occupation 1

Population Occupation 2

Population Occupation 3

Population Occupation 4

Population

HEDBAK

Crop production

Livestock production

Bee keeping

SHANKO

Livestock production

Crop production

Goats

DEGA KEJA

Livestock production

Crop production

Bee keeping

SHANKO 2

Livestock production

Crop production

Bee keeping

BESSA MEJAN

Livestock production

Bee keeping

Crop production

MINOGELTI

Livestock production

Bee keeping

SHESHA GOYKE

Livestock production

Bee keeping

ERBORE

Livestock production

Crop production

KOLA KEJA

Livestock production

Crop production

Bee keeping

QUARO

Livestock production

Crop production

LALA

Livestock production

Crop production

Bee keeping

ERIYA

Livestock production

Bee keeping

Crop production

116

Page 1 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Major Occupational Categories - Major categories of occupation and percent of population

engaged in the occupation by Kebele

Occupational Categories and Percent of Population engaged within these occupational categories

Percent (%) of Population

KebeleName

Occupation 1

Population Occupation 2

Population Occupation 3

Population Occupation 4

Population

MRSHA

Livestock production

Bee keeping

Crop production

GEDBAK

Crop production.

Livestock production

Bee keeping

ASELE

Livestock production

Crop production

Bee keeping

117

Page 2 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Livelihoods - Households important sources of

livelihood (response in %)

Type of Livelihood Activity

Order of Importnce

Begging activities

1st

2nd

3rd

3.57

1.17

0.48

Daily laborer

0.68

0.50

0.24

Making jewellery

0.68

0.84

0.72

Pottery

1.02

1.34

1.44

Rearing & selling animals (camels, cattle, sheep, goats)

72.80

15.40

3.12

Sale_Of_Natural_Products - Charcoal

1.02

1.01

1.44

Sale_Of_Natural_Products - Firewood

1.02

2.85

6.47

Selling Cereal food crops (sorghum, maize, wheat, barley)

2.72

1.51

2.40

Selling dairy products (milk, butter, ghee, cheese)

1.02

39.50

30.20

Selling eggs (from own chickens) Beekeeping (selling honey

bees-wax, or bee-hives)

Selling Other foods (sugar, flour, coffee, etc.)

2.21

13.30

26.50

7.87

42.00

8.39

118

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Occupational Categories - Percent of population

above 15 years age by occupation categories

Type of Livelihood Activity

Main Occupation

Secondary Occupation

Below school age children

Cultivator

Neither studying nor working nor seeking work

Retired/ Old

Salaried

Student

Unemployed & seeking work

Agricultural labourer

Craftsman

Home-maker (housewife)

Livestock rearing

Non-agricultural labour

Shopkeeper and Petty trade

1st Occupation

0.45

19.80

2.73

1.65

0.11

2.56

0.11

0.06

0.11

0.40

71.90

0.06

2nd Occupation

0.00

0.72

0.00

1.80

1.08

0.06

0.54

71.00

0.18

0.00

0.18

17.50

0.48

119

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Economic Vulnerability: Sources of Food - Households source for different food items (response in %)

Selected Indictor:

Source of Food

Types of Food Item

Begging

Borrowed

0.40

Casual labor

1.30

1.20

4.20

Free meals/Food assistance

4.20

Gathering catching

73.80

Gifts from friends/neighbors

25.00

25.90

4.80

120

0.40

7.70

15.30

0.40

3.90

11.80

9.10

33.30

2.00

36.40

Page 1 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Economic Vulnerability: Sources of Food - Households source for different food items (response in %)

Selected Indictor:

Source of Food

Types of Food Item

Other

Own cultivation/production

Purchase from roadside

vendor/tuck shop

Purchase subsidized food

from Kebele shop

Purchases from main shop

75.00

71.40

19.00

66.70

4.20

0.40

1.20

33.30

79.20

4.20

48.20

26.70

0.20

0.60

25.50

54.50

60.00

50.00

21.60

20.00

50.00

2.00

20.00

121

Page 2 of 2

WDRP Indicators

Crop Production Characteristics

122

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Hazards: Change in Crop Damages - Proportion of Total Crop Damage

Extent of Crop Damage (%)

Last_Year_Percentage

0.66

Five_Year_Percentage

1.19

1 - 25

91.40

20.85

26 - 50

0.66

24.21

51 - 75

1.32

22.26

76 - 100

5.92

31.49

Extent of Crop Damage Last_Year

100

1 - 25

26 - 50

51 - 75

Extent of Crop Damage

1 - 25

26 - 50

51 - 75

76 - 100

Extent of Crop Damage Five Years Ago

1 - 25

26 - 50

51 - 75

Extent of Crop Damage

1 - 25

26 - 50

51 - 75

76 - 100

123

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Hazards: Change in Crop Damages - Major reasons for crop damage

Major Reason of Crop Damage

Last_Year

Five_Year_Ago

Pests / Termite

0.00

32.00

Drought

0.00

9.50

Flood

0.00

55.00

Frost/ Cold wave

0.00

3.40

Others (specify)

0.00

0.50

Major Reason of Crop Damage -

Last Year

Major Reason of Crop Damage -

Five Years Ago

Pests / Termite

Flood

Others (specify)

Drought

Pests / Termite

Frost/ Cold wave

Others (specify)

Frost/ Cold

wave

Drought

Flood

Others (specify)

Drought

Pests / Termite

Frost/ Cold wave

124

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Hazards: Change in Crop Damages - Proportion of Damage for Major Crops

(percentage response by households)

Last Year

Five Years Ago

1-25%

26-50%

51-75%

76-100%

Barley

100.00

0.00

100.00

0.00

Beans

0.00

100.00

0.00

100.00

0.00

Lentils

100.00

0.00

100.00

0.00

Maize

27.90

1.04

9.00

19.80

59.58

25.10

3.00

22.70

0.20

31.30

Millet

25.00

0.00

50.00

0.00

25.00

0.00

50.00

0.00

50.00

Other pulses

0.00

100.00

0.00

100.00

0.00

Sesame

0.00

100.00

0.00

100.00

0.00

Sorghum

35.60

1.08

7.90

19.00

52.92

21.80

3.40

24.20

0.00

33.90

Sunflower

35.10

30.00

28.07

5.30

1.80

1.79

42.90

33.90

3.57

17.90

Teff

0.00

50.00

0.00

100.00

0.00

Wheat

0.00

100.00

0.00

66.70

33.30

125

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Hazards: Change in Crop Damages - Reasons for Damage of Major Crops

Last Year

Five Years Ago

Barley

Beans

Lentils

Maize

Millet

Other cash crop

Other pulses

Sesame

Sorghum

Sunflower

100.00

0.00

100.00

0.00

59.58

25.10

25.00

50.00

0.00

100.00

3.40

24.20

28.07

33.90

0.00

100.00

0.20

31.30

25.00

0.00

25.00

0.00

100.00

0.00

1.80

17.90

0.00

100.00

0.00

50.00

0.00

35.60

1.08

0.00

27.90

1.04

50.00

0.00

75.00

100.00

0.00

7.90

19.00

35.10

1.79

0.00

9.00

19.80

0.00

100.00

0.00

52.92

21.80

30.00

42.90

126

Page 1 of 2

Barley

Beans

Lentils

Maize

Millet

Other cash crop

Other pulses

Sesame

Sorghum

Sunflower

0.00

100.00

0.00

3.00

22.70

0.00

100.00

0.00

33.90

5.30

3.57

127

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Hazards: Change in Crop Damages - Reasons for Damage of Major Crops

Teff

Wheat

0.00

50.00

0.00

100.00

0.00

66.70

33.30

0.00

128

Page 2 of 2

Teff

Wheat

0.00

100.00

0.00

129

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region

S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Agricultural Situation: Change in Crops Grown - Five major crops grown by proportion of total cultivated land

Kebele Name

HEDBAK

Major Crops

Sorghum

Maize

Main Season

Belg

Present

Cropped Area

Five_Years_Ago

Reason_For_Change

Maize farming is increasing due to increasing

pest attack for sorghum

Beans

Belg

Millet

Belg

DEGA KEJA

Sorghum

Belg

SHANKO

MRSHA

Sorghum

Belg

Maize cultivation is increasing due to

availability of seeds (improved seeds)

No reason given from respondents

MINOGELTI

ERBORE

LALA

Sorghum

C - Nov

(Hidar)

C - Nov

(Hidar)

H - Apr

(Meazea)

G - Mar

(Megabit)

B - Oct

(Tikimt)

100

However there is the practice of farming no

harvest for 15 consecutive years

100

No yield at all

Farm land is increasing even though there is no

increment of crop yield

Maize cultivation is reducing

We left some crops farming due to lack of rain

fall

130

Page 1 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region

S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Agricultural Situation: Change in Crops Grown - Five major crops grown by proportion of total cultivated land

Kebele Name

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

ASELE

DEGA KEJA

SHESHA GOYKE

Major Crops

Sorghum

Maize

Sorghum

Main Season

B - Oct

(Tikimt)

C - Nov

(Hidar)

B - Oct

(Tikimt)

C - Nov

(Hidar)

Belg

Present

Cropped Area

Five_Years_Ago

100

Reason_For_Change

Sowing of maize is increasing due to

availability improved seed input

Maize cultivation is increasing due to increased

pest attacks of sorghum

However all the community households’

practice crop farming is very rare

Maize farming is increasing owing to resistance

for currently available crop pests

No yield at all

Maize

Belg

No yield at all

QUARO

Sorghum

Maize

Meher

Farm land is increasing even though there is no

increment of crop yield

Beans

Meher

GEDBAK

Sorghum

Maize

Belg

Maize cultivation is increasing due to increased

pest attacks of sorghum

131

Page 2 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region

S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda

HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Agricultural Situation: Change in Crops Grown - Five major crops grown by proportion of total cultivated land

Kebele Name

GEDBAK

Major Crops

Haricot Bean

Main Season

Belg

Present

Cropped Area

Five_Years_Ago

Reason_For_Change

132

Page 3 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Economic Vulnerability: Status of Agriculture - Methods of tillage, Irrigation and other agricultural input utilization

by households

Percentage of

Last Year

0.77

Irrigated Area

Five Years Ago

0.81

Percentage of households

with irrigated area

Last Year

Five Years Ago

9.56

10.21

Source of Irrigation

River/Lake/Pond

Response Method of Tillage

1.32 Oxen

Response Type of Fertilizer

52.70 Chemical

Response

0.33

Birkas (tanks)

Other (specify)

0.00

17.00

No Irrigation

(Rain-fed)

Source of Irrigation

100

81.70

Birkas (tanks)

Other (specify)

No Irrigation (Rain-fed)

River/Lake/Pond

Source of Irrigation

Birkas (tanks)

River/Lake/Pond

No Irrigation (Rain-fed)

Other (specify)

Tractor

Manual

None

0.33

46.60

0.33

Natural/Animal manure

Both Chemical and

Natural

None

1.16

0.66

97.20

Method of Tillage

Manual

None

Oxen

Method of Tillage

None

Oxen

Tractor

Type of Fertilizer

100

Both

Chemical and

Natural

Chemical Natural/Animal

manure

Type of Fertilizer

None

Both Chemical and

Natural

Chemical

Natural/Animal manure None

Type of Pesticide

Chemicals (insecticides,

fungicide, etc)

Natural methods

None

Response

0.32

7.02

92.20

0.00

Type of Pesticide

100

Chemicals

(insecticides,

fungicide, etc)

Natural

methods

Type of Pesticide

None

Natural methods

Chemicals (insecticides,

fungicide, etc)

None

Proportion_Improved_Seeds

53.90

Proportion_Agriculture_Service

133

86.80

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Crops Grown - Number of crops grown by households

Number of Crops Grown

One type

Crops Grown Last Year

11.20

Crops Grown Five Years Ago

9.91

Two types

62.00

63.80

Three types

22.10

23.00

Four types

3.01

1.85

Five types

1.41

0.49

Avg Crops Grown Last Year

Avg Crops Grown Five Years Ago

2.21

2.16

Number of Crops Grown Last Year

Five types

Four types One type Three types

Number of Crops Grown

Two types

Five types

Two types

Four types

One type

Three types

Number of Crops Grown five years ago

Five types

Four types One type Three types Two types

Number of Crops Grown

Five types

Two types

Four types

One type

Three types

134

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Major Crop Type

Teff

Barley

Wheat

Maize

Sorghum

Millet

Other pulses

Sunflower

Sesame

Vegetables

Other cash crop

September 2010

Zone SOUTH OMO

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Economic Vulnerability: Crops Grown - Types of crops grown by households

Type of Crops Grown

Last Year

0.51

Type of Crops Grown

Five Years Ago

0.35

0.00

0.09

0.00

0.35

39.70

40.60

49.90

0.59

0.35

7.49

0.09

0.34

7.22

1.26

0.17

0.08

0.00

0.08

0.52

Types of Crops Grown - Percent Responses of HHs for Last Year as compared to

Five Years Ago

50 50

Barley

LEGEND :

Maize

Millet

Other cash Other pulses

crop

Sesame

Sorghum

Last year

Five Years Ago

Sunflower

Teff

Vegetables

Wheat

135

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Economic Vulnerability: Crops Grown - Proportion of households by amount of

yield of major crops (last year)

Maize

Millet

Other cash crop

Other pulses

Sesame

Sorghum

Sunflower

Teff

49.50

47.70

2.86

85.70

14.30

100.00

43.80

46.80

8.29

1.08

100.00

66.70

16.70

136

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

SOUTH OMO

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Economic Vulnerability: Crops Grown - Proportion of households by amount of

yield of major crops (Five Years Ago)

Types of Major Crops

Category of Yield used to be obtained five years ago

Maize

Millet

Other cash crop

Other pulses

Sesame

Sorghum

Sunflower

Teff

100.00

36.80

58.90

4.31

100.00

26.40

59.50

12.60

1.16

0.19

100.00

66.70

33.30

66.70

33.30

100.00

137

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Economic Vulnerability: Land Ownership and Quality - Landownership of households

Households owning land (%)

Average landholding (in Hectares)s

Households cultivating land in last 12 months (%)

Average quantity of land cultivated (in hectares)

97.10

3.74

97.10

0.77

Range Land Holding

Percent_Response

A - Less than 0.25 ha

33.0

B - 0.25 - 0.50 ha

43.0

C - 0.5 - 0.75 ha

9.0

D - 0.75 - 1 ha

8.0

E - 1 - 2 ha

2.0

F - More than 2 ha

6.0

IMPORTANT: ha = Hectar

Household Responses to Range Land Holding

32.7

6.0

2.1

7.8

8.5

Range Cultivated Land

A - Less than 0.25 ha

B - 0.25 - 0.50 ha

C - 0.5 - 0.75 ha

D - 0.75 - 1 ha

E - 1 - 2 ha

F - More than 2 ha

Percent_Respons

37.0

41.0

7.0

8.0

2.0

5.0

Household Responses to Range Cultivated Land

36.7

5.4

1.6

8.5

6.8

42.8

A - Less than 0.25 ha

B - 0.25 - 0.50 ha

C - 0.5 - 0.75 ha

D - 0.75 - 1 ha

E - 1 - 2 ha

F - More than 2 ha

32.7%

42.8%

8.5%

7.8%

2.1%

6.0%

Total:

100.0%

41.1

A - Less than 0.25 ha 36.7

B - 0.25 - 0.50 ha

41.1

C - 0.5 - 0.75 ha

6.8

D - 0.75 - 1 ha

8.5

E - 1 - 2 ha

1.6

F - More than 2 ha

5.4

Total:

100.0

138

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Economic Vulnerability: Land Ownership and Quality - Farmers’ perception on the

quality of their agricultural land

Cropping_Intensity *

Households with enough land for farming

HHs with favourable location of farm

Response

Households with fertile soil

Yes

22.50

Highly fertile

49.80

Response

4.43

Partially

55.20

Fertile

54.80

22.30

Not fertile

40.70

* Cropping Intensity = (Gross Cropped Area / total land owned Area )x 100%

Household responses to the type of farm

location

Household responses tp the type of soil

fertility

Partially Yes

Fertile

Highly fertile Not fertile

139

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Environmental Situation: Land-Use other than crop production - Types of land use other than crop production

across Kebeles

Landuse_1

Comments_1

Landuse_2

Comments_2

Landuse_3

Comments_3

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

Grazing land

Grazing and browsing

Honey

production(forest)

SHANKO 2

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

QUARO

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

Farm land and

cultivable land

Grazing land

20%

Honey production

Most part of the PA is

grazing (browsing

land)

Honey production

15%

There is high

production of

honey

Grazing land(browse)

Cultivable land

Grazing land inclusive

of bush and shrubs

Cultivable fertile land

The most important

for shoats

Honey production

Highest importance if

the system changed

to irrigation

Grazing land

85% grazing and bush

and shrub lands

There is vast

cultivable land if

irrigation schemes

established

Crop land

Grazing land

There is wide

grazing land

however it is

devoid of grass

15%

Bushes and shrubs

45%

(for browsing)

Forest

harvest(incense

and gum)

Forest harvest

(incense and gum)

There is high

source of gum and

incense

140

Page 1 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Environmental Situation: Land-Use other than crop production - Types of land use other than crop production

across Kebeles

Landuse_1

Comments_1

Landuse_2

Comments_2

Landuse_3

Comments_3

LALA

ERIYA

"The land is degraded

and lost its

Grazing land

Farm land

MRSHA

GEDBAK

ASELE

Grazing land including

browsing shrubs and

bushes

"There is no suitable

land for grazing almost

all areas

The majority of the

land in the PA boundary

is grazing, however it

has been degraded due

to over grazing

There is vast area of

vacant range land

which is suitable for

livestock production

however it is devoid

of pasture

70% of the land is

being used for grazing

and unsuitable for

crop farming 20%

cleared for crop

farming, but no yield

10 waste land

Honey flora

"There are various

141

Page 2 of 2

WDRP Indicators

Livestock Production Characteristics

142

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Kebele Name

Agricultural Situation: Status of Livestock Disease - Change in Livestock Disease

Status

Current_Level

Change_Over_Last_Decade

Comment

GEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO

MRSHA

MINOGELTI

"There is several

livestock disease and

this distribution is wider

when compared

Decreasing during the

last 10 years

Livestock disease like

tryponosomiasis,

anthrax, black leg,

cCBPP, and pasturelosis

prevalence is decreasing

whereas ticks

infestation,

mangemites, CCPP and

tick borne diseases are

increasing

The distribution of many

disease is decreasing as

anthrax, black leg,

pasteusellosis, CCPP,

but the distribution of

some increasing as ticks,

CCPP, mangemites and

new diseases are also

happening

Some disease that were

common in the area are

decreasing as

tryponosomiasis but new

diseases are introducing

The number of livestock

diseases increasing even

there is better health

access

Decreased because of supply of

drugs and vaccination by

government

The prevalence of

tryponosomiasis , CBPP and

black leg is decreasing whereas

new disease are introducing as

the recently introduced

devastating sheep disease

New fatal diseases are

introduced and killed many

sheep and goats

Tocontrol the quality of

drugs

143

Page 1 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Kebele Name

MINOGELTI

ERBORE

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

LALA

ERIYA

Agricultural Situation: Status of Livestock Disease - Change in Livestock Disease

Status

Current_Level

Change_Over_Last_Decade

Comment

The distribution of

disease is increasing

particularly external

parasites(ticks and

menges)

Common disease in the

area is decreasing

where as new disease

introducing

The type of livestock

diseases increasing

especially for shoats

Some disease

distribution is

decreasing as anthrax,

CBPP, black leg and

pastorolosis where as

some are increasing as

CCPP, ticks,

mangemites,

tryponosomiasis and

some unsepcific diseases

of sheep

The distribution of some

diseases is decreasing as

anthrax, CBPP, black

leg, but ticks, CCPP,

mangemites increasing

Some diseases are

reducing but the

distribution of some

increasing such as tick

and mangeites

New diseases are introduced eg

sheep disease, the distribution

of ticks also increasing owing to

less efficiency of drugs

Several diseases are decreasing

(the distribution ) but new fatal

diseases are introducing

eg-sheep disease outbreak in

2000

The incidence of some diseases

decreased, but some new

diseases introduced

There is great change on

distribution of anthrax ,black

leg, CBPP ie Decreasing but

CCPP, ticks and mangemites

distribution increasing

Anthrax, black leg,

pastorolosis, and CBPP are

reducing but tick infestation

increasing

Animal health services

should be established in

the PA

144

Page 2 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Kebele Name

MRSHA

GEDBAK

ASELE

Agricultural Situation: Status of Livestock Disease - Change in Livestock Disease

Status

Current_Level

Change_Over_Last_Decade

Comment

There is reduction of

common diseases in the

area such as

Tryponosomiasis,

mangeites

Livestock disease

distribution is increasing

due to lack of frequent

animal health services

and lack of annual

vaccination programmes

there is no change on

distribution

Prevalence of new

animal disease is

increasing from time to

time due to increasing

movement for grazing

and lack of regular

animal health services

Although common livestock

disease is decreasing but new

diseases are being introduced

145

Page 3 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor: Livestock Diseases Prevalece

Type of livestock diseases affected households in the last five years (households reporting in %)

African horse disease

1st

2nd

3rd

0.17

Anthrax

0.66

3.70

Black leg

0.84

0.18

CBPP

3.03

16.10

Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia (CCPP)

22.60

47.40

4.53

Faculiasis

5.98

17.30

10.30

Internal and External Parasite

1.00

19.00

51.40

Liverfluke

0.66

6.22

7.97

Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD)

1.18

Newcastle disease (Chicken)

0.17

0.34

1.81

None

0.17

4.53

PPR

0.17

Sheep pox

0.17

Tick born diseases

0.17

1.09

Tick borne diseases

0.17

Trypanosomiasis

68.60

0.17

0.18

146

Page 1 of 1

Wereda

Disaster Risk

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

Level of Access

Excellent

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Evaluation of Access to Veternary Services and Livestock Drugs

Households’ evaluation on access to drugs and veterinary services

Veternary Service

0.33

Livestock_Drugs

0.17

Good

12.80

13.00

Adequate

8.65

6.99

Poor

32.40

33.30

Very poor

45.80

46.60

Level of Access to Veternary Services

Access Level of Livestock Drugs

Adequate

Good

Poor

Very poor Excellent

Adequate

Good

Poor

Very poor Excellent

147

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

GEDBAK

Agricultural Situation: Livestock Diversity - Type of livestock and their economic

importance in the community

Type of Livestock

Cattle: Mature Female

Avg_Num_Per_HH

2.00

Economic_Importance_Rank

Goats

6.00

Sheep

2.00

Donkeys

Bee keeping

SHANKO

Cattle: Female

4.00

Goats

9.00

Sheep

1.00

Bee keeping

2.00

Poultry

DEGA KEJA

Cattle: Female

5.00

Goats

25.00

Sheep

4.00

Bee keeping

2.00

Donkeys

Cattle: Mature Female

Goats

5.00

Sheep

2.00

SHANKO

Cattle: Mature Female

4.00

Goats

20.00

Sheep

3.00

Bee keeping

2.00

Donkeys

148

Page 1 of 4

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

MRSHA

Agricultural Situation: Livestock Diversity - Type of livestock and their economic

importance in the community

Type of Livestock

Cattle: Mature Female

Avg_Num_Per_HH

12.00

Economic_Importance_Rank

Goats

25.00

Sheep

18.00

Bee keeping

8.00

Donkeys

3.00

MINOGELTI

Cattle: Mature Female

12.00

Goats

75.00

Sheep

15.00

Bee keeping

6.00

Donkeys

Cattle: Mature Female

10.00

Goats

60.00

Sheep

10.00

Bee keeping

3.00

Donkeys

1.00

ERBORE

Cattle: Mature Female

10.00

Goats

30.00

Sheep

4.00

Donkeys

KOLA KEJA

Cattle: Mature Female

Goats

Sheep

Donkeys

149

Page 2 of 4

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

KOLA KEJA

Agricultural Situation: Livestock Diversity - Type of livestock and their economic

importance in the community

Type of Livestock

Bee keeping

Avg_Num_Per_HH

Economic_Importance_Rank

ERBORE

Cattle: Mature Female

6.00

Goats

30.00

Sheep

6.00

Donkeys

LALA

Cattle: Mature Female

6.00

Goats

45.00

Sheep

3.00

Bee keeping

4.00

Donkeys

1.00

ERIYA

Cattle: Mature Female

8.00

Goats

40.00

Sheep

6.00

Bee keeping

4.00

MRSHA

Cattle: Mature Female

10.00

Goats

30.00

Sheep

5.00

Donkeys

Bee keeping

7.00

GEDBAK

Cattle: Female

3.00

Goats

12.00

Sheep

4.00

Bee keeping

150

Page 3 of 4

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

GEDBAK

Agricultural Situation: Livestock Diversity - Type of livestock and their economic

importance in the community

Type of Livestock

Donkeys

Avg_Num_Per_HH

Economic_Importance_Rank

151

Page 4 of 4

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Economic Vulnerability: Livestock Ownership and Changes - Percentage of households by number and type of

livestock owned

A - 1 to 5

C - 11 to 50

D - 51 to 100

None

Bee keeping

10.30

76.70

6.90

Camels: Female

1.30

3.80

1.30

92.30

Camels: Male

2.60

94.80

Camels: Young Female

2.60

1.30

94.80

Camels: Young Male

3.90

94.80

Cattle: Female

0.80

52.50

45.80

0.30

Cattle: Male bulls

0.70

54.40

43.80

0.50

Cattle: Mature Female

23.70

38.30

13.70

0.50

Cattle: Mature Male

48.70

20.30

1.70

2.90

Cattle: under 1 year

1.00

43.90

55.10

Donkeys

10.80

5.40

73.00

8.10

Goats

1.30

9.70

72.50

14.40

152

Page 1 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Economic Vulnerability: Livestock Ownership and Changes - Percentage of households by number and type of

livestock owned

A - 1 to 5

C - 11 to 50

D - 51 to 100

None

Horses

100.00

Mules

100.00

Poultry

16.30

6.10

71.40

2.00

Sheep

0.90

7.40

88.20

2.20

153

Page 2 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Livestock Ownership and Changes - Households

perception on changes in livestock number in the last five years (response in %)

Type of Livestock Owned

Changes Observed By Households

Camels: Female

Decreased

80.00

Increased

Remained the Same

20.00

Camels: Male

100.00

Camels: Young Female

100.00

Camels: Young Male

100.00

Cattle: Female

51.10

12.30

21.20

Cattle: Male bulls

46.80

26.70

26.50

Cattle: Mature Female

81.40

12.20

6.40

Cattle: Mature Male

80.00

12.30

7.70

Cattle: under 1 year

6.40

85.60

7.90

Donkeys

3.90

96.10

Goats

23.90

47.70

27.90

Poultry

13.20

59.50

26.10

Sheep

28.90

53.50

17.60

154

Page 1 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Livestock Ownership and Changes - Households

perception on changes in livestock number in the last five years (response in %)

Type of Livestock Owned

Reason for Decrease in Livestock Number

Camels: Female

Camels: Male

Camels: Young

Female

Camels: Young

Male

Cattle: Female

Cattle: Male bulls

Cattle: Mature

Female

155

Page 2 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Livestock Ownership and Changes - Households

perception on changes in livestock number in the last five years (response in %)

Cattle: Mature

Male

Cattle: under 1

year

Donkeys

Goats

Horses

Mules

Poultry

Sheep

156

Page 3 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Access to Pasture

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Agriculture (Livestock): Pasture Availability - Households perception on access

and quality of pasture

Response Percent

Quality of Pasture

Response Percent

Regularly available

1.00

Excellent

0.34

Occasionally

69.70

Good

8.29

Seldom available

28.60

Adequate

3.38

Never available

0.67

Poor

50.30

0.00

Very poor

37.60

0.00

0.17

Household responses to Access to Pasture for

Livestock

0.7

28.6

Household responses to Quality of Pasture

3.4

0.3

8.3

0.2

37.6

69.7

Never available

Occasionally

0.0%

0.7%

69.7%

Regularly available 1.0%

Seldom available 28.6%

Total:

100.0%

Adequate

Good

Poor

Very poor

Excellent

3.4%

8.3%

50.3%

37.6%

0.2%

0.3%

Total:

100.0%

50.3

157

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Agriculture (Livestock): Pasture Availability - Households perception on

problematic months for pasture availability

Problematic Months

Order of Severity

A - Sep (Meskerem)

B - Oct (Tikimt)

C - Nov (Hidar)

D - Dec (Tahsas)

E - Jan (Tir)

F - Feb (Yekatit)

G - Mar (Megabit)

H - Apr (Meazea)

I - May (Ginbot)

J - Jun (Sene)

K - Jul (Hamle)

L - Aug (Nehase)

1st

93.00

4.50

0.70

2nd

4.52

93.10

2.01

3rd

2.01

1.85

72.70

0.67

0.17

0.20

1.80

0.34

22.50

158

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Selected Indicator

Agriculture (Livestock): Water Availability - Households response on water

availability for livestock

Access to Water - Livestock

Household Response

Regularly available

Occasionally

Seldom available

Never available

8.77

17.10

73.20

0.88

Household Access to Water for Livestock

Never available

Occasionally

Regularly available

Access to Water - Livestock

Seldom available

Never available

Occasionally

Regularly available Seldom available

159

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Agriculture (Livestock): Water Availability - Households perception on

problematic months for water availability for Livestock

Problematic Months

Order of Severity

A - Sep (Meskerem)

B - Oct (Tikimt)

C - Nov (Hidar)

D - Dec (Tahsas)

E - Jan (Tir)

F - Feb (Yekatit)

G - Mar (Megabit)

H - Apr (Meazea)

I - May (Ginbot)

J - Jun (Sene)

K - Jul (Hamle)

L - Aug (Nehase)

1st

93.00

3.85

0.52

0.35

2.27

2nd

4.90

93.50

1.22

0.17

3rd

1.05

2.45

66.30

0.52

0.17

29.40

160

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Sources of water for livestock (households response in %)

Type of Livestock Owned

Open well

Other

Piped water outside the house

Pond or lake (open access)

Rainwater harvesting

River, stream

Changes Observed By Households

Family reasons

3.91

32.80

2.38

19.00

0.34

41.00

Dry Season

8.20

45.00

4.50

2.30

0.20

39.00

Household Responses to Type of Water Source and Season for Livestock

Open well

Other

Piped water outside

the house

Pond or lake (open

access)

Type of Water Source & Season

Rainwater harvesting

River, stream

Family reasons

Dry Season

161

Page 1 of 1

WDRP Indicators

Access to Market and Credit

162

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

SHANKO

Economic Vulnerability: Proportion of Produce Sold and Market - Proportion of crops and livestock sold from total

production and markets

Market_For_Crops

Market_For_Livestock_Produce

Percent

Livestock_Sold

Total_% Comments

Sold

40% Sell livestock sometimes

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO 2

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

QUARO

ERBORE

MURALE

LALA

No sale of crop

produce

No sale of crop

produce

No sale of crop

produce

No sale of crop

produce

No sale of crop

produce

No sale of crop

produce

No sale of crop

produce

No sale of crop

produce

Dimeka

Turmi, Dimeka, Keyafer, Kako

Turmi and Dimeka

Turmi and bush market

particularly goat -grain

exchange

Turmi and at their villages (crop

traders bring crop and exchange

for goats

Erbore and Birale

Erbore

Erbore,Birale

Dimeka,Kako and Keyafer

Sell livestock to purchase grains

Sell livestock (particularly goat) to

purchase grains

10% Sell livestock (particularly goat) to

purchase grains

10% to Sell livestock (particularly goat) to

15% purchase grains

Sell livestock (particularly goat) to

purchase grains

Sell livestock (particularly goat) to

purchase grains

Sell livestock (particularly goat) to

purchase grains

Sell livestock (particularly goat) to

purchase grains

163

Page 1 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

ASELE

Economic Vulnerability: Proportion of Produce Sold and Market - Proportion of crops and livestock sold from total

production and markets

Market_For_Crops

Market_For_Livestock_Produce

Percent

Livestock_Sold

Total_% Comments

Sold

No sale of crop

produce

Turmi, Dimeka, Keyafer,

Kako,jinka

Sell livestock (particularly goat) to

purchase grains

No sale of crop

Turmi, Dimeka and bush

produce

market(exchange of heifers for

bulls)

Dimeka, Keyafer

and at village

Dimeka, Kako and Keyafer

Sell livestock (particularly goat) to

purchase grains

No sale of crop

produce

Turmi, Dimeka and bush

market(exchange of heifers for

bulls)

Sell livestock (particularly goat) to

purchase grains

164

Page 2 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Kebele Access to Markets - Access to market by Kebele

Kebele Name

ASELE

DEGA KEJA

ERBORE

ERIYA

GEDBAK

KOLA KEJA

LALA

MINOGELTI

MRSHA

SHANKO

HEDBAK

QUARO

SHESHA GOYKE

BESSA MEJAN

SHANKO 2

Market_Access_Comments

There is good access and linkages with livestock markets, price offer are also better than

before particularly this year. But pastoralists are not willing to sell

As current condition, access to and linkages with livestock market is better than before.

But the awareness of the community about livestock market is poor

"There is good and linkage to livestock market, but they are not willing to sell animals

during good price season.

There is good access and linkage with livestock markets as a result of improved road

condition and good price offers

There is no access and linkage with market. The market points (like Dimeka, Keyafer and

Kako) are 35 to 70 km far away from the kebele

At this time there is good price offer for livestock in local markets (at Dimka or Turmi),

but herders are not willing to sell unless hunger strikes them

There is good linkage and access to livestock market and there is good price offer for

livestock at Dimeka, Turmi, Keyafer, and Kako livestock markets

Livestock market points are very far from the PA (about 60 km), therefore, crop traders

bring crops (sorghum) to the area and exchange it with goat. For instance, on average,

price of goat is Birr 400 which is exchanged for 50 km of sorghum

Although the local community has good access to livestock market and good price offers

for their produce, they are not willing to sell unless they face problems

Poor access to market places particularly during rainy season

"There is no access to and linkage with markets. Dimeka and Keyafer markets are 56 to

60 kms far away

There is no livestock market access problem, but the only problem is lack of awareness

on selling of livestock at good price offer times

"This community has low access for livestock market due to too far distant from

marketing points i.e., 55 km.

"There is good access and linkage with markets and good price offer for cattle and goats,

but the price offer

There is good access and linkage with livestock market, and the price offer for livestock

has increased by three fold

165

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Formal & Informal Transfers - Percentage of households

reporting received formal transfers

Type of Formal Transfer

Food aid

HH Response Type of Informal Transfer

Formal

61.60 Remittances (from relative living elsewhere)

61.60

Food-for-Work project

2.20 Zakaat

2.20

Cash-for-Work project

0.20 Other cash gift

0.20

Faffa

0.50 Cash loan (no interest)

0.50

Free cash

0.30 Food or grain gift

0.30

Seeds

88.80 Grain loan (no interest)

88.80

Credit support

0.50 Seed gift

0.50

Livestock

Seed loan

Blood money – compensation

Sacrifice made to feed the poor

Cash or kind gift to married daughters when they visit

parents or relatives

Gift of livestock to newly-weds

Donation or loan of milking animals to a relative or

friend

Dowry given to bride’s parents

Donations of cash or animals to disaster stricken

people

166

HH Response

0.20

1.60

0.30

4.80

0.30

1.90

0.30

0.80

1.80

0.60

1.00

0.20

Page 1 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Formal & Informal Transfers - Percentage of households

reporting received formal transfers

Type of Formal Transfer

HH Response

Formal

Type of Informal Transfer

Blood money – compensation

Free labour

Free use of oxen or plough

Free use of pack animals (camels or donkeys)

Restocking of poorer relatives

Distribution of meat to neighbours after a slaughter

takes place

Sacrifice made to feed the poor

Cash or kind gift to married daughters when they visit

parents or relatives

Gift of livestock to newly-weds

Donation or loan of milking animals to a relative or

friend

Dowry given to bride’s parents

Donations of cash or animals to disaster stricken

people

Free labour

Free use of oxen or plough

Free use of pack animals (camels or donkeys)

Restocking of poorer relatives

Distribution of meat to neighbours after a slaughter

takes place

HH Response

2.10

3.30

1.60

0.20

1.80

0.60

1.00

0.20

2.10

3.30

1.60

0.20

167

Page 2 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Formal & Informal Transfers - Percentage of households

reporting received formal transfers

Type of Formal Transfer

HH Response Type of Informal Transfer

Formal

Type of Formal Transfer Received By Households

HH Response

0.2

0.5

61.6

0.0%

Cash-for-Work project

Credit support

Faffa

0.1%

0.3%

Food aid

40.0%

Food-for-Work project

Free cash

Livestock

1.4%

0.2%

0.0%

Seeds

57.6%

Total:

100.0%

2.2

0.3

88.8

168

Page 3 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Formal & Informal Transfers - Percentage of households

reporting received Informal transfers

Type of Formal Transfer

Food aid

HH Response Type of Informal Transfer

Formal

61.60 Remittances (from relative living elsewhere)

HH Response

0.20

61.60

0.20

Food-for-Work project

2.20 Zakaat

1.60

2.20

1.60

Cash-for-Work project

0.20 Other cash gift

0.30

0.20

0.30

Faffa

0.50 Cash loan (no interest)

4.80

0.50

4.80

Free cash

0.30 Food or grain gift

0.30

Seeds

88.80 Grain loan (no interest)

1.90

88.80

1.90

Credit support

0.50 Seed gift

0.30

0.50

0.30

Livestock

Seed loan

0.80

Blood money – compensation

Sacrifice made to feed the poor

1.80

Cash or kind gift to married daughters when they visit

0.60

parents or relatives

Gift of livestock to newly-weds

1.00

Donation or loan of milking animals to a relative or

1.00

friend

169

Page 1 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Formal & Informal Transfers - Percentage of households

reporting received Informal transfers

Type of Formal Transfer

HH Response

Formal

Type of Informal Transfer

Dowry given to bride’s parents

HH Response

Donations of cash or animals to disaster stricken people

0.20

Blood money – compensation

Free labour

2.10

Free use of oxen or plough

3.30

Free use of pack animals (camels or donkeys)

1.60

Restocking of poorer relatives

0.20

Distribution of meat to neighbours after a slaughter

takes place

Sacrifice made to feed the poor

1.80

Cash or kind gift to married daughters when they visit

0.60

parents or relatives

Gift of livestock to newly-weds

1.00

Donation or loan of milking animals to a relative or

1.00

friend

Dowry given to bride’s parents

Donations of cash or animals to disaster stricken people

0.20

Free labour

2.10

Free use of oxen or plough

3.30

Free use of pack animals (camels or donkeys)

1.60

Restocking of poorer relatives

0.20

Distribution of meat to neighbours after a slaughter

takes place

170

Page 2 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Formal & Informal Transfers - Percentage of households

reporting received Informal transfers

Type of Formal Transfer

HH Response Type of Informal Transfer

Formal

Type of Informal Transfer Received By Households

HH Response

0.0%

Cash-for-Work project 0.1%

Credit support

0.3%

Faffa

0.3%

Food aid

40.0%

Food-for-Work project 1.4%

Free cash

0.2%

Livestock

0.0%

Seeds

57.6%

Total:

100.0%

171

Page 3 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Access to Credit Facilities - Households access to credit facilities

Type of Access To Credit Facilities

Households with membership in any credit /micro finance society (%)

Households who borrowed any money in the last one year (%)

Households who tried to borrow 3-4

Households who managed to get credit 1-2

Indicator_Value

2.30

1.10

16.70

100.00

83.30

Average No. of HHs Tried to get Credit

Average No. HHs Managed to get Credit

0.82

0.45

172

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Access to Credit Facilities - Percentage of households by major reasons

of borrowing money

Type of Borrowing Reason

Degree of Importance of the Borrowing Reasons - HH Respones

1st

2nd

3rd

Buy food

Buy or rent land

Others (specify)

Pay for education

Pay for health care

Pay for social event

20.00

100.00

20.00

100.00

173

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Access to Credit Facilities - Percentage of households by major sources

of credit

Major Sources of Credit for Households

Degree of Importance of the Credit Source

1st

2nd

3rd

Bank/ formal lending institution

Friends/relatives

Help associations (Edir)

Informal savings group (Ekub)

Local shops / moneylenders

Neighbors

Others

40.00

20.00

40.00

174

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Access to Credit Facilities - Percent of households with ability to raise

500 birr in one week

HH Ability To Raise 500 Br in One Week

Response_Percent

Yes, we would use our savings

54.10

Yes, by borrowing money

4.15

Yes, with some help from others

1.38

Perhaps, but I doubt it

6.22

No, it would be impossible

34.00

N/A

0.17

Households' Ability To Raise 500 Br in One Week

N/A

No, it would be

impossible

Perhaps, but I doubt it

Yes, by borrowing

money

Yes, we would use our

savings

Yes, with some help

from others

175

Page 1 of 1

WDRP Indicators

Health and Sanitation

Characteristics

176

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Household Access to Health Facilities - Where do patients go for health care?

Constraints to adequate healthcare

Where do Patients Go for Healthcare

HH Response Constraints to Adequate Health Car

HH Responses

Did not get Health Care

Community health worker

Central Hospital

District/Municipal hospital/health

centre/ clinic

Other public

Pharmacy

Other private

Traditional/spiritual healer

Other

9.88

20.70

1.55

15.10

No money for treatment costs

No money for travel

Don’t believe in health care

23.60

2.52

0.19

18.00

8.33

Not aware about any health facility

70.20

6.38

2.13

21.30

Where Do Patients go for Health care?

Constraints to Adequate Health Care

Central Hospital

Community health worker

Did not get Health Care

District/Municipal hospital/health centre/ clinic

Other

Other private

Other public

Pharmacy

Traditional/spiritual healer

1.6%

20.7%

9.9%

15.1%

8.3%

0.2%

23.6%

2.5%

18.0%

Total:

100.0%

Don’t believe in health care

No money for travel

No money for treatment costs

Not aware about any health facility

0.0%

2.1%

6.4%

70.2%

21.3%

Total:

100.0%

177

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Hazards: Health problems and changes over the last decade

Kebele Name

Health_Problems

Changes_In_Last_Decade

HEDBAK

Malaria, ascarias, taenias, common cold and bloody

diarria.

DEGA KEJA

Malaria infection is reducing rapidly since the supply of

mosquito net, but common cold, taeniasis, and ascarias

infections are increasing.

ADAMIE

SHANKO

After Omo river flood recession (flood retreat) (September

-December) conflict treat time.

Malaria infection is reducing where as taeniasis and

ascariasis is increasing.

BESSA MEJAN

The health situation is becoming bad when compared to

the last generation era owing to lack of resistance due to

depletion of livestock produce and crop produce.

Malaria is decreasing

whereas taenias, ascarias,

common cold and un

specific diaharia infections

increasing.

Before 10 years malaria

has been the main disease

in the area and has been

affected all the

community, but now it is

diminishing. Taeniasis,

ascarias and common cold

infections were rare

before, but now they

become common

infections in the area

particularly taeniasis has

become resistant for

drugs.

Malaria is rapidly

decreasing after supply of

mosquito net, but

taeniasis and ascarisis is

increasing.

in the past years we have

bad plenty of milk to used

food and blood meal also

,but know this produce is

becoming scarce

,therefore the main cause

for health compliation is

this scarcity.

178

Page 1 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Hazards: Health problems and changes over the last decade

Kebele Name

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

Health_Problems

unspecific diarrhea ,taeniasis ,malaria, common cold,

pneumonia

pneumonia, common cold, taeniasis , malaria, Diarrhea

QUARO

MURALE

On and off malaria, gip, common cold diarrhea.

Malaria was the main disease in the area, but now it is

decreasing, common cold, taeniasis and ascariasis are

common infections in the area.

ERBORE

LALA

Malaria is seasonal disease and it is decreasing from time

to time. Taeniasis and ascriasis are common disease of

this area. Its distribution is increasing from time to time.

The health situation of human popullation in the PA is

better than before for malaria, whereas the infection of

ascariasis and taeniasis increasing.

ERIYA

Human health condition is getting better especially

malaria, but the infection taeniasis and ascariasis is

increasing.

Changes_In_Last_Decade

Malaria infection is

reducing, but taeniasis is

increasing.

The level of infection is

reducing except taeniasis

which become increasing

from time to time and

become resistant for

drugs.

Malaria infection is

decreasing rapidly.

There was high level

malaria infection

especially after flooding

seasons, but now it has

declined after supply of

mosquito net, but the

infection of taeniasis and

ascariasis is increasing.

Malaria infection is

decreasing very rapidly

whereas gip infection is

increasing.

Malaria infection is

decreasing very rapidly

whereas gip infection is

increasing due to lack of

sanitation and increasing

consumption of livestock

produce.

179

Page 2 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Hazards: Health problems and changes over the last decade

Kebele Name

MRSHA

Health_Problems

Malaria and unspecific diarrea are seasonal diseases.

GEDBAK

ASELE

malaria ,GIP, and unspecific diarrea are the main seasonal

diseases

Malaria, GIP and eye infections are common disease in the

community. There is high infection and taeniasis and

ascariasis infection as well.

Changes_In_Last_Decade

The level of malaria

infestation is decreasing

by for told as though some

unspecific health

complications increasing.

malaria infection is

reducing where as

taeniasis and ascariasis

infection is increasing

Eye infection is increasing

whereas malaria infection

is decreasing. Taeniasis

and ascariasis infection is

also increasing. The cause

of eye infection is the soil

that they smear /used for

hair decoration mixing

with butter.

180

Page 3 of 3

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Household Health Status - Households health condition and major health problems

Health Condition

HH Response Population Sickness

HH Response Children Sickness

HH Response

Good health

83.0

Malaria

32.0 Chronic fever

24.0

Ill for <3 months

16.0

Chronic fever

22.0 Malaria

26.0

Ill for more than three months

1.0

Diarrhea

19.0 Diarrhea

41.0

Mental illness

1.0

2.0

Pneumonia/ lung problem

3.0 DK

2.0

Tuberculosis

2.0

Stomach pain

2.0

Hyper tension

1.0

Meningitis

1.0

Asthma

0.0

Headache

6.0 Headache

4.0

Back ache

5.0 Meningitis

1.0

Eye problems

4.0 Eye problems

2.0

181

Page 1 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Household Health Status - Households health condition and major health problems

Health Condition

HH Response Population Sickness

HH Response Children Sickness

HH Response

Health Condition of the Community

1.4

15.8

82.9

Good health

Ill for <3 months

Ill for more than three months

0.0%

82.9%

15.8%

1.4%

Total:

100.0%

Asthm

Back ache Chronic fever

Diarrhea

Population Sickness in the Community

problem

Eye

Headache Hyper tension

alaria

Population Sickness

eningitis

ental

illnessPneumopnroiab/lelumng

pain

ach

Stom

Tuberculosis

Children Sickness in the Community

Chronic fever

Diarrhea

Eye problems

Headache

Malaria

Children Sickness

Asthma

Chronic fever

Headache

Malaria

Mental illness

Stomach pain

Back ache

Diarrhea

Eye problems

Hyper tension

Meningitis

Pneumonia/ lung

problem

Tuberculosis

Meningitis

Chronic fever

Diarrhea

Eye problems

Headache

Malaria

Meningitis

182

Page 2 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Household Access to Sanitation - Percentage of households with access to

different kind of toilet facilities

Type of Toilet Facility

HH Response

Modern water closet

Ventilated, build in latrine

Outdoors latrine/hole on plot

No facilities/Open Space

HH Sharing Toilet

0.32

0.49

6.80

92.20

0.16

12.20

Household Responses to the type of toilet facilities in the community

0.2

0.5

0.3

6.8

Modern water closet

No facilities/Open Space

Outdoors latrine/hole on

plot

Ventilated, build in latrine

92.2

183

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Household Access to Drinking Water - Sources of drinking water for households

(response in %)

Sources of drinking water for Households

Priority of the Water Source

Main

Secondary

Birka

Communal tap (Bono)

Covered well or borehole

Open well

Piped water outside the house

Pond or lake (fenced)

Pond or lake (open access)

River, stream

0.32

20.30

0.49

14.10

2.92

3.73

57.80

0.00

22.20

11.10

0.00

5.56

38.90

Source of Drinking Water & Type of Source

Birka

Communal

tap (Bono)

Covered well

or borehole

Open well

Piped water Pond or lake Pond or lake River, stream

outside the (fenced)

(open

house

access)

Main

Secondary

184

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Household Access to Drinking Water - Households methods of treating drinking

water

Method of Treating Water

HH Response

Boil

0.50

Water Guard

0.17

Other Method (specify)

98.80

None

0.33

Method of Treating Water by Households

100

Boil

None

Other Method (specify)

Water Guard

Boil

None

Other Method (specify)

Water Treatment Method

Water Guard

185

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Household Access to Drinking Water - Number of times households fetch water in

a week

Number of Times Households Fetch Water in a Week

HH Response

Once

0.32

Twice

0.16

Three times

1.12

Four times

4.17

Five times

4.98

Six times

0.16

Seven times

Average Number of Times HH Fetch Water Per Week

Number of Times HH Fetch Water in a Week

100

88.60

6.68

Five times

Four times

Once

Seven times

Six times

Number of Times HH Fetch Water in a Week

Three times

Twice

Five times

Four times

Once

Seven times

Six times

Three times

Twice

186

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Household Access to Drinking Water - Time taken per day to fetch water for

households

Time Taken To Fetch Water

HH Response

Less than 30 min

51.44

30 min - 1 hr

31.57

1 hr and Above

Average Number of Times Taken To Fetch Water

16.99

48.74

Time Taken To Fetch Water for the HH

1 hr and Above

30 min - 1 hr

Less than 30 min

1 hr and Above

30 min - 1 hr

Less than 30 min

Time Taken To Fetch Water

187

Page 1 of 1

WDRP Indicators

Coping Mechanisms and

Preparedness

188

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Sudden Onset Disasters

KebeleName

Precaution_1

Comment_1

Precaution_2

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

HEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO 2

If depend on the

disaster type .if it is

livestock and /or

human disease.

If depend on the type

of disaster if it is a

conflict at grazing

and water points

areas during

shortage.

If the coming disaster

is disease of livestock

and human, we

restrict movement to

disease source areas.

Restrict livestock

movement to disease

source areas.

It is our usual

measure we have

been taking since

the age of our young

hood and in the era

of our fathers.

This only and usual

measure they have

been taking.

This is the only usual

measure of our

community.

Livestock disease

are usually appeared

un expectedly, so

the only measure is

restrict movements

until vaccination

and treatments

rendered.

189

Page 1 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Sudden Onset Disasters

KebeleName

Precaution_1

Comment_1

Precaution_2

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

Aware the herders to

evacuate all livestock

from boarder grazing

areas.

pass information to

all PA community

about the coming

disaster to take care

and prepare for

coming

disaster(conflict)

shift livestock to safe

grazing and watering

points (for conflict)

Conflict with

Dasenech is in

evitable for kuluma

and gelema

community.

Conflict is always

expected disaster

for this community,

so information

should be fast and

include all PA and

vicinity PA to save

hammer ethnic from

effects of Dasenech

and/or borena.

If we dont change

grazing points, the

magnitude and

duration of damage

will increase

livestock will be

taken at the time of

fighting.

190

Page 2 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Sudden Onset Disasters

KebeleName

QUARO

ERBORE

LALA

Precaution_1

Regular follow up of

river volume to

evacuate from

village.

Shifting of livestock,

women, children and

elders to flood safe

crops.

For livestock disease

disasters we apply to

pastoral development

office to get animal

health services

before death occur.

Comment_1

These are the only

measures of the

community to lead

normal life without

leaving the birth

place.

To save loss of life

and damage of

properties.

Precaution_2

At current condition

this is the only

measure to save our

main stay.

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

191

Page 3 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Sudden Onset Disasters

KebeleName

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

Precaution_1

If it is disease of

livestock we restrict

movement to disease

source areas and

appeal for animal

health office.

In this community

there is no expected

rapid onset disaster,

but if human or

livestock disease

appear, we swiftly

inform to the

government office.

Restrict movement to

disease source areas

for human and

livestock diseases

disasters.

Comment_1

B/c of livestock

diseases are usually

un expected and the

only measure is

restricts movement

of livestock to

disease areas and

applies to animal

health office to

reduce disasters.

at this time we have

no any measures to

be taken culturally

and /or knowledge

and skill to control

and prevent human

and livestock

disease out break

It is our usual

measure to reduce

disease incidences

of human and

livestock.

Precaution_2

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

192

Page 4 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Sudden Onset Disasters

KebeleName

ASELE

WENBAYNO

Precaution_1

Shifting of grazing

points and announce

for all the PA

community as there

is threat of conflict

with Borena. (Warn

the community to

take care and guard

their livestock

seriously).

If the coming disaster

is disease of livestock

and human, we

restrict movement of

livestock and humans

to disease outbreak

areas, but for other

disasters, no

measures to be

taken.

Comment_1

This is our usual

measure to save loss

of life and livestock

raiding by rival

ethnic groups

(Borena or Gabra).

Precaution_2

there is the only

option and capacity

of the community

until we apply to

govt.

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

193

Page 5 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Increase in Disaster Intensity

KebeleName

Precaution_1

Comment_1

Precaution_2

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

HEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO 2

We submit

application for

wereda

administration

office

Feed shortage for

livestock, human

being food

shortage

If disaster is

livestock disease

we drive livestock

to health services

for mass

vaccination or

treatment

Present appeal for

wereda PDO to get

more and routine

animal health

services

It is the only

measure to protect

community lives

Mobilization with

their livestock to

grazing and water

points, funding food

grain during feed

grain shortage

Driving livestock to

health centres is

the last measure of

our community

before many losses

occurred

livestock disease

disasters are

difficult to prevent

by community

coping mechanisms

without the support

of the government

Apply to wereda

administration

office to protect

the community from

loss

Human disease out

breaks is resolved

only by the

involvement of

wereda government

officials

Bring livestock for

mass vaccination

and treatment

services

Since livestock is the

main livelihood

source and they need

support from

government

194

Page 1 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Increase in Disaster Intensity

KebeleName

Precaution_1

Comment_1

Precaution_2

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

purchasing of food

grain at low price

times and selling

of livestock at

good price offer

times (for hunger)

Request help from

neighbouring PAs

to push back the

coming enemy

But we used to face

the reverse one

Keeping numerous

livestock to resist

drought loss

It is usual asking

help from

neighbouring PA the

same ethnic groups

to resist of grazing

rival ethnic to save

PA community

Appeal for wereda

administrators to

resolve the raised

conflict

for conflict the

elders find

resolution methods

dialogue with

government

It is usual resolving

raised conflict

dialogue with elders

of both ethnics by

government

mediator when

there is frequent

attack and long

duration conflict

For livestock

diseases, bring

livestock to health

services for

vaccination and

treatment

Recurrent drought

has been killing our

livestock

If the conflict zones

become broaden (if

the conflict is among

borena, Dassenech

and gabra) the PA

elders appeal for

local governmnet to

settle the current

situation

we have found that

annual vaccination

and frequent

treatment services

save (reduce loss of

livestock during

disease outbreak and

long distance

trekking for grazing)

195

Page 2 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Increase in Disaster Intensity

KebeleName

Precaution_1

Comment_1

Precaution_2

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

ERBORE

No measures we

take except

evacuating during

flooding and

return to usual

settlement area

after flood retreat

we have been living

here resisting this

happening however

the effect and

magnitude of

flooding has been

increasing since

1999 etc there is no

other alternative

also rather than

using flood

recession

agriculture and

settlement of two

river side (Woito

river)

196

Page 3 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Increase in Disaster Intensity

KebeleName

Precaution_1

Comment_1

Precaution_2

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

KOLA KEJA

The PA elders

discuss about the

magnitude and

effect of disaster

by giving priority

for traditional

forecasters

Disease hazards

(both livestock and

human) are

becoming beyond

the capacity of the

community.

poaching and

encroaching parks

and buffer zones

the major coping

mechanisms used in

the area.

197

Page 4 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Increase in Disaster Intensity

KebeleName

Precaution_1

Comment_1

Precaution_2

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

QUARO

LALA

forward

application for

wereda

administration to

get support of fuel

for motorized

boat, and support

of other

requirements as

treatment of flood

water, support of

mosquito net,

support of

treatment for

water borne

diseases and

support of food aid

offer livestock to

health services for

mass vaccination

and treatment

if the flood disaster

increases, we

couldn’t recover

without the support

of the government

Mass vaccination

and mass treatment

activities have been

saved losses of

livestock from

death of certain

diseases as anthrax,

CCPP, CBPP, black

leg

Shifting of grazing

places when the

disease outbreak

occurred in dry

season grazing areas

Shifting is another

method for our

community to reduce

disease distribution

and death rate

198

Page 5 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Increase in Disaster Intensity

KebeleName

Precaution_1

Comment_1

Precaution_2

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

ERIYA

MRSHA

bring all livestock

to animal health

services for mass

vaccination and

treatment

Selling livestock at

their good body

condition and

purchasing grain at

the time of low

price

Vaccination services

are very important

for suddenly

occurred disease as

the previous

experiences

At this time

livestock market is

becoming attractive

due to getting more

awareness from

agricultural

extension workers

We have seen price

differences of

livestock at the

time of drought and

crop prices during

dry seasons as well

Frequent change of

grazing and

watering points

199

Page 6 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Increase in Disaster Intensity

KebeleName

Precaution_1

Comment_1

Precaution_2

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

GEDBAK

ASELE

sending elders to

wereda

administration

office to get fast

response

Send application

to wereda

administration

office to settle the

arising conflict

Stresses given by

wereda

administration

office if elders

apply about the

magnitude of

disaster face to

face

If the magnitude

and duration of

conflict increases,

our livestock will be

affected due to

shortage of pasture

and water

Therefore seeking

solution with

counsellor of

government is the

only remedy to for

sustainable stability

of the community

Purchasing drugs at

pharmacy or

elsewhere

regardless of costs

We have got good

responses for some

disease in buying

drugs and treating by

ourselves

200

Page 7 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Increase in Disaster Intensity

KebeleName

Precaution_1

Comment_1

Precaution_2

Comment_2

Precaution_3

Comment_3

WENBAYNO

For livestock

disease hazards

the only option is

taking livestock to

government vet

services and for

human diseases to

health centres as

well, but for food

and livestock feed

shortage, we

exchange grain for

shoats and sell

shoats for grain

purchased

The adaptive

measures for

livestock and human

diseases were the

experiences of

elder’s young hood,

but now the only

option for these

disasters is taking to

go health services

for every year crop

familiarity

purchasing has been

the only alternative

measure for the PA

community to

mitigate hunger

For livestock feed

shortage trekking to

grass and water

available areas is

the usual character

of the community

201

Page 8 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Disasters

Kebele Name

Precaution 1

Comment 1

Precaution 2

Comment 2

Precaution 3

Comment 3

HEDBAK

SHANKO

Store food grain

which collected at

good seasons until

the beginning of

the next wet

season.

There are no

precautions to

prevent the effect

but when the new

disease of livestock

can be occurring.

We were spending

food grain at good

harvest season by

selling and giving for

poor, but now the

harvest is becoming

small, even

insufficient for one

crop season .therefore

to reduce hunger

hazards majority of

the community start

saving from small

harvest for severe

hunger seasons.

The good experience

to take their livestock

for vaccination during

disease time .it is the

wise harder that

regulating the

community.

Vaccination for

livestock

annually to

prevent them

from fatal

disease as

anthrax, CBPP

etc…

202

Page 1 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Disasters

Kebele Name

DEGA KEJA

Precaution 1

For livestock feed

and water shortage

problems and food

shortages, we find

grazing areas and

food grain sources.

Comment 1

When the coming

months are expected

to be dry we already

find grazing and

watering points to

save our main stay.

Recently the majority

of the community have

started finding food

grain available areas

by affordable prices to

reduce livestock loss.

Precaution 2

For livestock

disease out

breaks, we bring

livestock for

vaccination

before driving to

dry season

grazing areas

especially for

anthrax and

CBPP.

Comment 2

Now we are

informed on the

importance of

vaccines and

have got great

changes on the

development

these diseases.

Precaution 3

Comment 3

SHANKO 2

Find food grain

available areas at

good price.

During peak dry and

food shortage seasons

finding food grain at

fair price is difficult.

Therefore, at current

condition, finding food

grain sources before

hunger seasons come

have become usual

and profiting.

Find livestock

feed and water

sources.

203

Page 2 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Disasters

Kebele Name

BESSA MEJAN

Precaution 1

No one has taken

preventive

measures except

roaming for

livestock feed and

water as usual

activities.

Comment 1

Still we have no

experience on

preventive measures

of hunger except

selling of livestock for

grain when bad

seasons come.

Precaution 2

We keep/herd

livestock

splitting at

different grazing

areas to save

from rival ethnic

looters.

Comment 2

to reduce

livestock by

rustlers, we split

herds at

different grazing

areas and

frequently

change grazing

areas to conceal

from rival ethnic

looters

(Dasenech and

gnangatom)

Precaution 3

Comment 3

204

Page 3 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Disasters

Kebele Name

MINOGELTI

Precaution 1

No measures have

taken for negative

effects of hunger

(precaution), but

for conflict routine

scout of boarders

made and warn all

the PA community

when there is sign

of conflict.

Comment 1

it is day to day activity

to save the lives of the

community and loss of

livestock by raiders ,so

that routine scouting

boarders is crucial to

prevent and control

from risk of conflict

disaster ,but for

hunger there is no any

precaution except

purchasing crops when

food shortage occur in

the house hold.

Precaution 2

For livestock

disease diseases,

we purchase

drugs regardless

of prices and its

quality.

Comment 2

Livestock is the

only main stay of

the community

without any

alternative,

therefore great

attention is

given for

livestock health.

Precaution 3

Comment 3

SHESHA GOYKE

Frequent scouting

out of boarder to

prevent rival

ethnic infiltration.

It is the only measure

to protect livestock

from raiders and loss

of life .early

identification of

looters movement also

reduce level of

conflict.

Finding grazing

and watering

points.

During prolonged

drought finding

grazing and

watering points

is the primary

issue to save loss

of livestock.

restrict movement

to disease source

areas (livestock

disease source

areas)

To reduce

livestock disease

distribution,

restriction to

grazing and

watering points is

the only option.

205

Page 4 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Disasters

Kebele Name

QUARO

Precaution 1

regular follow up

of cultural early

indicators to

escape before

onset of flooding

Comment 1

Cultural early

indicators have

becoming promising to

save the life of the

community, crop and

livestock damage.

Precaution 2

Follow early

warning

information

from

government and

NGOs and

evacuate

livestock and

community

before flooding

on set.

Comment 2

Precaution 3

Comment 3

KOLA KEJA

Practice crop

farming however

crop productivity

about every year

due to drought.

Due to crop price rises

from time to time

(goat -grain exchange

rise) and depletion of

livestock resources

and produce owing to

administrating of

pasture land due to

rain shortage.

Selling of

livestock for

grain purchase

waiting good

market seasons

and saving

money for bad

times.

Grain-goat

(grain-money)

purchasing is

becoming hard

or expensive

during dry

seasons and

affecting PA

resources by

external traders.

At this time

great change by

this activity.

searching good

market points for

livestock sell and

grain purchase

Some livestock

owners have

becoming livestock

market oriented

and getting

common price

offer for their

produce and also

their need from

market. This

activity is

promising.

206

Page 5 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Disasters

Kebele Name

ERBORE

Precaution 1

early identification

of early warning

indicators

(cultural) and

announce for the

community if there

is threat of

flooding

Comment 1

We have better early

warning indicators and

we have got good

response.

Precaution 2

shifting of

livestock to safe

grazing points

before flooding

Comment 2

Precaution 3

forward

application for

woreda

administration

office to get fuel

support for

motorized boat

Comment 3

we have saved

household utensils

from damage since

we get support

from government

(boat and fuel

support)

LALA

we didnt take any

precaution for

hunger but for

livestock disease,

we purchased

drugs against ccpp

and we have sent

livestock for

vaccination of

anthrax before

driving to disease

source areas(dry

season grazing

areas)

for several years back

we have not had any

precaution for hunger

but we have been

offered livestock for

vaccination to protect

them from death of

anthrax at disease

source areas(dry

season areas)

207

Page 6 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Disasters

Kebele Name

ERIYA

Precaution 1

we dont have any

precaution for

hunger, but for

livestock feed and

water shortages,

we already find

grazing and

watering points

when the coming

seasons are

prolonged dry

Comment 1

Hunger is beyond the

capacity of community

b/c of affecting all

community members

regardless of having

livestock resources.

Therefore we didnt

have any precaution

measures for food

shortage in the

previous hazards and

we will not have for

future as well.

Precaution 2

Comment 2

Precaution 3

Comment 3

208

Page 7 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Disasters

Kebele Name

MRSHA

Precaution 1

tending livestock

splitting at

different grazing

and water points to

protect our

resource from

looting ,death due

to drought and

disease

Comment 1

We have crop harvest

owing to erratic rain

fall every year .so our

harvest is only

livestock.

Precaution 2

Saving relief

grain giving

priority for

children.

Comment 2

Virtually in all

seasons (years of

the harvest)

there is crop

failures, we are

depend on relief

grain (on support

of the

government) as

though we are

selling several

shoats to meet

family food

need.

Precaution 3

Comment 3

GEDBAK

storing food grain

which harvested at

good seasons for

hunger seasons

At current condition

all community

members informed on

storing food grain at

good harvest seasons

to prevent households

from hunger.

Finding food

grain source

areas when

there is less

harvest.

Before hunger

seasons appear,

we find food

grain sources to

purchase before

crop prices rise.

209

Page 8 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Community Preparedness against Disasters

Kebele Name

ASELE

Precaution 1

We find grazing

and watering

points at distant

areas if the coming

seasons are dry and

unsuitable for

livestock.

Comment 1

This is the only

measure for our

community to save the

main stay of the

community (livestock).

There is no important

of shortages of feed

and water for

livestock.

Precaution 2

Comment 2

Precaution 3

Comment 3

WENBAYNO

There were no

precautions taken

by households to

prevent from

negative impacts

of drought.

all disaster negative

impacts which has

happened in the PA

were and will be

beyond the capacity of

the communitywide

(rain shortage and its

consequences)

210

Page 9 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

HEDBAK

Hunger was the usual disaster affecting the community.

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Use of wild fruits and leaves, borrowing food grain from relatives (vicinity PA), selling shoats for grain.

Description

Recovery_Strategy

Recovery is easy for this community when good seasons come. They sow usual crops and recover easily, but they

return to shock when the next season becomes dry.

Crop farming at good seasons.

Description

The recover farming usual crops.

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

The well-being give loan for penniless without interest.

during hunger seasons, the well-being share purchased crops for their relatives and/or give loan without interest, the

penniless who don’t have relative in the same PA also find /beg food grain from the other area relatives.

211

Page 1 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

SHANKO

Hunger, livestock feed and water shortage, livestock production decrease.

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Selling of their livestock for crop food purchases, use of well fruits and leaves in forest, decreasing feeding system.

Description

Recovery_Strategy

The government and NGO they relief the harder selling shoats for crop food, the outbreak of vaccination for livestock

disease and human being, to treatment of seek livestock.

Food supply from government and NGO for hunger and vaccination and treatment of disease.

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

To continuous the relief has been for all the community well enough rain fall can become and the enough pasture for

their livestock.

Commonly they borrow and lend one for each other during hunger the goats or sheep.

During drought time (after the incidence of death of livestock one can borrow or loan for other with a cultural, that it

well be returned during good seasons or after the good pasture and water satisfied.

212

Page 2 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

DEGA KEJA

Food grain shortage, livestock feed and water shortage and livestock disease

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Description

Selling of shoats to overcome hunger, begging food grain from relatives (wealthy) and neighbouring, taking livestock

other areas.

They sell shoats for food grain and sharing with poor relatives

Recovery_Strategy

Crop sowing at good season, keeping livestock.

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

Sowing usual crops and keeping livestock were recovery strategies for wealthy and borrowing shoats from herds were

for whom lost their shoats by diseases.

During the incident the rich share food grain

During the incidence the wealthy and PSNP beneficiaries share their purchased and transfer to poor and

non-beneficiaries

213

Page 3 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

SHANKO 2

drought(food crop, livestock feed and water shortage)

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Use of wild fruits and leaves, food supply from the government selling shoats for grain.

Description

Recovery_Strategy

The wealthy were selling extra surplus livestock produce to purchase grain, crop farming (increasing farm size to

reduce loss recovery efforts were promising and easy for pastoral community after rain.

crop farming when wet seasons come, keeping livestock caring for their health

Description

Crop farming increasing farm size at good seasons and keeping grain (store grain) for bad seasons.

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

214

Page 4 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

BESSA MEJAN

Hunger, livestock feed and water shortage.

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Selling livestock for grain for hunger, trekking livestock to distant grazing points.

Description

During hunger time, they exchange goats for grain or sell and purchase grain. They also encroach the park for grazing

Recovery_Strategy

For 10 years there is no recovery from food and feed shortage.

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

For the last 10 years there is no harvest and selling goats for grain is usual for this community except for 6 relief

months. We have got relief food for 6 months.

During hunger season the wealthy share purchased crops for poor.

It is usual for this community sharing food grain which is obtained either from relief or from purchase.

215

Page 5 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

MINOGELTI

Unspecific sheep disease that introduced from Kenya and CCPP.

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Frequent changing of watering and grazing point, split flock to different grazing points.

Description

reduce selling of shoats for grain to replace losses by disease .(reducing food grain purchase)

Recovery_Strategy

The one who become poor by the effects of disease beg or take loan from well-being.

Description

The affected ones borrow shoats without interest from better-off relatives or friends

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

during the incident they exchange information about the distribution of disease

During incident, the elders restrict movement to outbreak areas

216

Page 6 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

SHESHA GOYKE

Food shortage, livestock feed and water shortage and newly introduced sheep disease.

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Helping each other.

Description

Recovery_Strategy

The better off share purchase crops for poor relatives, they give (borrow) shoats for exchange for grain or sell for

grain purchase.

PSNP beneficiaries recover during PSNP implementation months and the others taking loan from well-being.

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

PSNP beneficiaries replace sold goats during the implementation of PSNP programme where as the others whom are

not inclusive in PSNP take shoats loan from the wealthy which will be returned after they recover without interest.

During the incident of hunger the wealthy support the poor.

The wealthy share purchased crops for poor, borrow goats for crop exchange that will be returned in good times or

after recovery.

217

Page 7 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

QUARO

flooding

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Shifting to temporary settlement areas in the same PA, shifting the livestock grazing points.

Description

Recovery_Strategy

During flooding the flooding PA residents leave their village and wait at temporary settlement area in the same

kebele, they shift their livestock to flood free areas.

Re-sowing to replace damaged crops, return to settlement areas and lead usual life.

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

Erbore communities inclusive of this community farm in river recession agriculture therefore they harvest crop

whenever flooding ends.

During flooding the young and adults give priority for elders, children and women to evacuate first.

The young and adults evacuate women, elders and children using local boats regardless of blood linkages or relatives.

218

Page 8 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

KOLA KEJA

drought(livestock feed shortage and hunger)

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Too distant grazing areas mobility for search of pasture land, split herds, sell of livestock for grain purchase.

Description

Recovery_Strategy

they maintain remaining livestock for breeding and replace the last by selling drought resistant animals when good

conditions come(they sell goats to replace cattle)

During heavy loss, the poor beg from well off however there are losses of livestock for well off.

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

The affected ones borrow goats from well-to-do that remain some from many and he pay after his goats become

several. Some also take goats from well of marrying their daughters.

During the incident the better off slaughter livestock for poor to cope hunger, give goats or cattle when some bodies

livestock perished.

when there is prolonged ,the better off slaughter cattle or goat for poor to mitigate hunger, the better off also share

or give as loan the remaining livestock for his relatives after incident for recovery, the well-off also give livestock for

poor who have daughters for marriages.

219

Page 9 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

ERBORE

flooding

Coping_Strategy

Shifting to temporary settlement.

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Description

during flooding kuyle village communities shift to temporary settlement in the same PA

Recovery_Strategy

Return to their residences and lead their usual life, crop farming after flood retreated.

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

They return to their usual residence after the flood resided and lead their usual life, when the flood damage crop

(harvest or seedling) they re-sow when it retreat.

During the incident the swimmers help elders and women to cross the flooded area.

During flooding the swimmer support elders and women to cross the flooded area.

220

Page 10 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

LALA

Hunger and livestock diseases (anthrax, ccpp, and unspecific sheep disease still affecting several sheep of each

herder).

Coping_Strategy

Selling shoats for food grain to mitigate food shortage, the poor beg the wealthy for grain and shoats to be changed

or sold for grain.

Description

Recovery after wet seasons is easy for herders, but it is difficult for poor unless the wet season is sufficient for crop

farming.

Recovery_Strategy

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Crop farming at wet season, breeding the remaining livestock, taking loan (borrow) shoats for breeding from

relatives.

The well-being rear livestock and use livestock produce after wet season and farm crops. Those who become poor

due to effects of livestock disease have also take shoat loan from herder relatives to be returned after breeding

without interest.

During the incidence of hunger the rich share purchased food grain for poor, they give also shoat’s loan for poor for

grain and for breeding.

Description

221

Page 11 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

ERIYA

Recurrent drought is regular disaster of this community.

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Description

Recovery_Strategy

selling of shoats for grain, using wild fruits and leaves, borrowing shoats for sell to purchase grain, relief support from

govt.

During hunger seasons the livestock owners sell shoats to purchase grain, they also use wild fruits and leaves to save

life

rearing the remaining livestock ,farming crop at good season, taking shoat loan from wealthy

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

Breeding the remaining livestock for livestock owners, taking or borrowing shoats for breeding without interest was

for those who become poor due to effects of drought.

during the incidence sharing purchased and relief grain ,after the incident taking or giving livestock loan without

interest

During the incidence the wealthy share purchased grain for poor relatives or neighbours of the same ethnic or clan

.after the incident the wealthy give or borrow shoats or cattle for poor relatives for breeding without interest as to

be returned after breeding.

222

Page 12 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

MRSHA

Hunger, livestock feed and water shortage, livestock death (drought).

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Taking livestock to distant areas for grazing, sell of livestock for grain, utilizing wild fruits, splitting herds

Description

Recovery_Strategy

the better off maintain the remaining livestock at distant grazing areas till recovery time (good grazing seasons

come),

the one who become poor beg livestock from the better off, getting relief from govt.

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

the one who become poor owing to drought beg shoats and /or cattle from the better off who have save his resource

trekking too distant areas.

During incident the well-off purchased and/or exchange goat for grain for poor, slaughter cattle or shoats for poor.

During hunger seasons, the well-being share purchased crops for poor and give livestock loan for those who become

destitute on the bad effects of drought.

223

Page 13 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

GEDBAK

Food grain shortage was the disaster of this community.

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Description

Recovery_Strategy

Use of wild fruits and leaves, borrowing food grain from relatives (vicinity PA), selling shoats for grain, begging food

grain from relatives.

During the incident the well-being utilize stored food grain and sell shoats for food grain, the penniless borrow food

grain from rich relatives.

sowing crop at good wet season ,relief support from the government (food grain)

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

they recover from hunger by sowing and harvesting crop at wet seasons, they get also food aid from the government

and until the next wet season, the poor recover getting seeds from well-being relatives and govt.

During the incident, the well-being we have stored food grain for bad seasons borrow for poor without interest, the

well-off give food grain for poor relatives.

During the incidence the penniless get support from government and rich relatives until the next harvest season,

after the incident they recover sowing and harvesting food grain.

224

Page 14 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

ASELE

Recurrent drought and livestock diseases, also food grain and livestock feed shortage

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Description

Recovery_Strategy

Selling of shoats for grain, using wild fruits and leaves, borrowing shoats for sell to purchase grain, relief support

from government, begging food grain from relatives.

They sell shoats to purchase grains, they trek livestock to pasture water areas regardless of conflict threat. The poor

beg food grain from their relatives or neighbours until they get food aid from the government

Keeping livestock as usual.

Description

Selling shoats to purchase grains

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

During the incidence the well-being give food grain for penniless without any payment or interest. The poor also take

loan of livestock to rear without interest.

During hunger seasons the rich give purchased food grain for poor relatives without loan or interest. They also give

livestock loan to be returned after breeding without interest. At current condition recovery has become difficult.

225

Page 15 of 16

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Type of Disaster(s)

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Hazard: Coping and recovering during last Disaster

WENBAYNO

drought (hunger, livestock feed and water shortage)

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Coping_Strategy

Description

Recovery_Strategy

The well off sell livestock to purchase crops, the poor beg purchased crops; the poor beg purchased crops from better

off.

During hunger seasons the well-off sell livestock to purchase crops and drive their livestock too distant areas to save

their resource, the poor beg crops from their well off relatives.

The wealthy recover by rearing the remaining of livestock but it is difficult or no recovery option for poor.

Description

Community

Participation_Ways

Description

By splitting their herds, the better-off save the loss of more livestock and rear the remaining. But the poor have no

the option of recovery except getting some yield of crops when good rain seasons come or getting loan from wealthy.

The wealthy give livestock loan for poor, when the hunger become prolonged they slaughter for poor.

The one who have a number of livestock give livestock loan for poor or lower economic class to use the given loan for

crop exchange or for sale. The well off also share purchased crops for poor without payment.

226

Page 16 of 16

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Type Community Participation

Kebele Name

Levels_Comm_Participation

HEDBAK

There was good cooperation among the

community before 10 to 15 years but

deteriorating very rapidly.

DEGA KEJA

The level of cooperation has become

decreasing from time to time as increasing

population and eroding of culture.

SHANKO

BESSA MEJAN

The level of cooperation among the

community is not reduced in the PA. It is

maintained as before.

The level of cooperation among the

community and household is decreasing when

compared to the father’s adult hood era.

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

QUARO

KOLA KEJA

There is good cooperation during any type of

hazards.

There is strong cooperation among the

community since the young hood of elders to

this generation.

All PA community have strong linkage and

cooperation during any type of disasters

regardless of blood linkage or relationships.

In the era of elders the population were

cooperating in good and bad times and have

strong relation. The well of slaughter cattle or

shoats for poor in times hunger, they purchase

crops or exchange crops for shoats for poor.

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Changes_In_Last_Decade

There is high change on the level of

cooperation among the PA community

.at current condition it can be said

three is no cooperation.

There is greater change particularly

cooperation during hunger seasons.

But there is no change of cooperation

during conflict among and /or rival

ethnic groups.

No change at all.

Increased disasters specially hunger

disaster exhaust community resources

and recurrent drought as well as the

main cause of co-operation

deterioration among the community

and households.

No significant change yet.

No change on the level of

cooperation.

There is no any change on the level

of cooperation among the

community.

227

Page 1 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Type Community Participation

Kebele Name

ERBORE

Levels_Comm_Participation

There is high level of cooperation among the

community.

LALA

There is no significant change on the level of

cooperation during hunger and other

disasters.

ERIYA

The level of cooperation is eroding due to

recurrent attack of food shortage.

MRSHA

GEDBAK

The level of cooperation among the PA

communities and vicinity. The same groups

are reducing from year to year.

ASELE

There is high level of cooperation during

conflict with rival group ethnic groups, but

the level of cooperation during hunger season

is reducing at certain level.

228

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Changes_In_Last_Decade

There is no as such significant change

on the level of cooperation on the

last decades.

The only change is the amount of

resource transfer i.e. if someone who

is poor request food grain or livestock

support during hunger, the wealthy

give less amount owing to reduced

resources for wealthy as well.

There is great change of cooperation

of local communities due to

exhaustion of well-being in

supporting the penniless who are not

included in PSNP in every day and

food shortage seasons. At the young

hood stage of elders the level of

cooperation had been strong during

food shortage seasons.

There is very great change on the

level of cooperation among PA and

other neighbouring communities. The

root cause for this cultural

deterioration is exhaustion by

shortage of food and recurrent

support for penniless by having.

there is no change on the level of

cooperation to overcome conflict

problems with rival ethnic groups

,but cooperation during hunger

seasons is reducing owing to

exhaustion of well off resources by

recurrent drought effects.

Page 2 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Recovery from Losses from Disasters - Percentage of Households who

have managed to recover from losses of disasters

Percentage of households who have managed to recover from losses of disasters

Comments

20.20 %

229

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Type of Disaster

Capacity: Recovery from Losses from Disasters - Percentage of households

recovered from past disasters by type of Disasters

Recovered Percentage

Droughts

Floods

Crop diseases

Livestock diseases

Human diseases

Heat waves/ High temp

Conflicts

Economic / Price shock

29.10

2.40

14.70

27.70

21.60

0.27

3.47

0.53

230

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Capacity: Recovery from Losses from Disasters - Proportion of households

recovered by type of Losses

Type of Loss

Physical damages on houses and property

Percentage

1.61

Crop damage

27.10

Livestock damage

40.20

Death of household members

0.27

Illness/health problems

23.90

Loss of access to social services, including school

0.80

Loss of income

0.54

Loss of savings

1.07

Livestock were stolen

0.54

Lost access to grazing land

1.34

Lost access to water source

0.54

Had to flee/change residence area

0.54

Other losses/damages

1.61

231

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone SOUTH OMO

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Options if More Resources Available - What coping strategy

could be adopted if more resource were available?

Coping Strategy To Be Adopted

Response (%)

Other losses/damages

12.20

Storage of food and other necessities

85.70

Physical protection of buildings and property

1.94

232

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Percentage of households by

major type of coping strategies adopted (at least once)

Coping Strategy Adopted

Main Strategy

Secondary Strategy

Reduced expenditure on non-essential items (beer, cigarettes,

clothes, meat, etc.)

Consumption rather than sale of crop surplus

0.95

0.00

10.80

5.35

Sell more livestock than usual

23.00

8.72

Borrowing of food or cash (including purchasing food on credit)

5.39

8.39

Sale of non-productive assets (Jewelry, clothing, etc.)

0.30

0.16

Sending children of household for work

0.12

0.08

Short-term / seasonal labor migration

0.30

0.82

Long-term / permanent migration (including distress migration of

whole families)

Increased working hours

2.37

8.80

0.30

0.74

Seek alternative or additional jobs

0.83

2.63

Collection of wild food

25.50

14.10

Rely on less preferred and less expensive food

7.65

1.15

Rely on less preferred and less expensive food

1.13

5.43

Limit portion size at meals

1.84

3.54

Restrict consumption by adults in order for small children to eat

0.53

3.87

233

Page 1 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Percentage of households by

major type of coping strategies adopted (at least once)

Coping Strategy Adopted

Main Strategy

Secondary Strategy

Begging for money or for food

0.41

0.90

Reduce number of meals eaten in a day

13.90

29.50

Skip entire day without eating

0.30

2.14

234

Page 2 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies adopted by households for respective

disasters

Coping Strtegies Adopted

Types of disaters for which HHs in the community adopt the listed

Coping Strtegies

Begging for money or for

food

Borrowing of food or cash

(including purchasing food

on credit)

Collection of wild food

235

Page 1 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies adopted by households for respective

disasters

Coping Strtegies Adopted

Types of disaters for which HHs in the community adopt the listed

Coping Strtegies

Consumption rather than

sale of crop surplus

Increased working hours

Limit portion size at meals

236

Page 2 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies adopted by households for respective

disasters

Coping Strtegies Adopted

Types of disaters for which HHs in the community adopt the listed

Coping Strtegies

Long-term / permanent

migration (including

distress migration)

Reduce number of meals

eaten in a day

Reduced expenditure on

non-essential items (beer,

cigarettes, etc)

237

Page 3 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies adopted by households for respective

disasters

Coping Strtegies Adopted

Types of disaters for which HHs in the community adopt the listed

Coping Strtegies

Reduced expenditure on

productive inputs

(fertilizer, seeds, etc)

Rely on less preferred and

less expensive food

Restrict consumption by

adults in order for small

children

238

Page 4 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies adopted by households for respective

disasters

Coping Strtegies Adopted

Types of disaters for which HHs in the community adopt the listed

Coping Strtegies

Sale of non-productive

assets (jewellery,

clothing, etc.)

Seek alternative or

additional jobs

Sell more livestock than

usual

239

Page 5 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies adopted by households for respective

disasters

Coping Strtegies Adopted

Types of disaters for which HHs in the community adopt the listed

Coping Strtegies

Sending children of

household for work

Short-term / seasonal

labor migration

Skip entire day without

eating

240

Page 6 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Secondary coping strategies adopted by households for

respective disasters

Begging for money or for

food

Borrowing of food or cash

(including purchasing food

on credit)

Collection of wild food

Consumption rather than

sale of crop surplus

Increased working hours

241

Page 1 of 4

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Secondary coping strategies adopted by households for

respective disasters

Limit portion size at meals

Long-term / permanent

migration (including

distress migration)

Reduce number of meals

eaten in a day

Reduced expenditure on

health and education

Reduced expenditure on

productive inputs

(fertilizer, seeds, etc)

Rely on less preferred and

less expensive food

242

Page 2 of 4

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Secondary coping strategies adopted by households for

respective disasters

Restrict consumption by

adults in order for small

children

Sale of non-productive

assets (jewellery, clothing,

etc.)

Seek alternative or

additional jobs

Sell more livestock than

usual

Sending children of

household for work

Short-term / seasonal labor

migration

243

Page 3 of 4

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Secondary coping strategies adopted by households for

respective disasters

Skip entire day without

eating

244

Page 4 of 4

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies adopted by households to recover

from respective losses

Type of Coping Strategy Adopted

Type of Loss

Begging for money or for food

Borrowing of food or cash

(including purchasing food on

credit)

Collection of wild food

Consumption rather than sale

of crop surplus

245

Page 1 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies adopted by households to recover

from respective losses

Type of Coping Strategy Adopted

Type of Loss

Increased working hours

Limit portion size at meals

Long-term / permanent

migration (including distress

migration of whole families)

Reduce number of meals eaten

in a day

246

Page 2 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies adopted by households to recover

from respective losses

Type of Coping Strategy Adopted

Type of Loss

Reduced expenditure on health

and education (including taking

children out of school)

Reduced expenditure on

productive inputs (fertilizer,

seeds, livestock drugs, etc.)

Rely on less preferred and less

expensive food

Restrict consumption by adults

in order for small children to

eat

247

Page 3 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies adopted by households to recover

from respective losses

Type of Coping Strategy Adopted

Type of Loss

Sale of non-productive assets

(Jewelry, clothing, etc.)

Seek alternative or additional

jobs

Sell more livestock than usual

Sending children of household

for work

248

Page 4 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Selected Indicator

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Main coping strategies adopted by households to recover

from respective losses

Type of Coping Strategy Adopted

Type of Loss

Short-term / seasonal labor

migration

Skip entire day without eating

249

Page 5 of 5

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Percentage of households by

frequency of main coping strategies adopted

Type of Coping Strategy Adopted

Frequency of Adoption

Begging for money or for food

Borrowing of food or cash (including purchasing

food on credit)

Collection of wild food

Consumption rather than sale of crop surplus

Increased working hours

Limit portion size at meals

Long-term / permanent migration (including

distress migration)

Reduce number of meals eaten in a day

Reduced expenditure on health and education

Reduced expenditure on non-essential items

(beer, cigarettes, etc)

Rely on less preferred and less expensive food

Restrict consumption by adults in order for small

children

33.30

55.60

11.10

19.10

66.30

14.60

28.60

21.40

28.60

21.40

1.69

2.25

21.90

73.60

0.56

23.10

5.13

10.30

61.50

44.40

5.56

20.00

60.00

20.00

57.10

42.90

100.00

16.00

75.50

3.81

4.76

25.80

61.30

9.68

3.23

250

Page 1 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Coping Strategies Adopted by Households - Percentage of households by

frequency of main coping strategies adopted

Type of Coping Strategy Adopted

Frequency of Adoption

Sale of non-productive assets (jewellery, clothing,

etc.)

Seek alternative or additional jobs

Sell more livestock than usual

Short-term / seasonal labor migration

Skip entire day without eating

50.00

40.00

60.00

0.28

20.90

41.00

37.50

0.28

3.13

1.56

18.80

76.60

25.20

61.70

6.09

6.96

251

Page 2 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Alternative Livelihood Sources - Alternative livelihood sources suggested by the community

Kebele Name

Work_Option_1

Comment_1

Work_Option_2

Comment_2

Work_Option_3

Comment_3

HEDBAK

SHANKO

Store food grain

collected at good

seasons until the

beginning of the

next wet season.

Vaccination for

livestock annually

to prevent them

from fatal disease

such as

anthrax,CBPP

etc…

We were spending

food grain at good

harvest season by

selling and giving for

poor, but now the

harvest is becoming

small, even

insufficient for home

consuption. Therefore

to reduce hunger

hazards majority of

the community start

saving from small

harvest for severe

hunger seasons.

They have good

experience to take

their livestock for

vaccination during

disease time

252

Page 1 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Alternative Livelihood Sources - Alternative livelihood sources suggested by the community

Kebele Name

DEGA KEJA

Work_Option_1

Comment_1

For livestock feed

and water

shortage problems

and food

shortages, we find

grazing areas and

food grain

sources.

When the coming

months are expected

to be dry we find

grazing and water

points to save animals

Work_Option_2

For livestock

disease out

breaks, we bring

livestock for

vaccination

Comment_2

Work_Option_3

SHANKO 2

Find food grain

from other areas

at good price.

During peak dry and

food shortage seasons

finding food grain at

fair price is difficult.

Therefore, at current

condition, finding

food grain sources

before hunger seasons

is profitable

Find livestock

feed and water

sources.

MRSHA

No one has taken

preventive

measures except

migrating for

livestock feed and

water as usual

activities.

Still we have no

experience on

preventive measures

of hunger except

selling of livestock for

grain when bad

seasons come.

We keep/herd

livestock splitting

at different

grazing areas to

save from rival

ethnic looters.

To avoid loss of animals

by theft

Comment_3

253

Page 2 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Alternative Livelihood Sources - Alternative livelihood sources suggested by the community

Kebele Name

Work_Option_1

Comment_1

Work_Option_2

Comment_2

Work_Option_3

Comment_3

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

No measures have

been taken for

negative effects

of hunger

(precaution), but

for conflict we

help each other

Frequent scouting

out of boarder to

prevent rival

ethnic

infiltration.

It is day to day

activity to save the

lives of the

community and loss

of livestock by raiders

,so that routine

scouting boarders is

crucial to prevent and

control from risk of

conflict disaster

It is the only measure

to protect livestock

from raiders and loss

of life .early

identification of

looters movement

also reduce level of

conflict.

For livestock

diseases, we

purchase drugs

regardless of

prices and its

quality.

Finding grazing

and watering

points.

Livestock is the only

main economic activity

of the community

During prolonged

drought finding grazing

and water points is the

primary issue to save

loss of livestock.

restrict

movement to

disease areas

To reduce

livestock

disease

distribution,

restriction to

grazing and

water points is

the only

option.

254

Page 3 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Alternative Livelihood Sources - Alternative livelihood sources suggested by the community

Kebele Name

ERBORE

Work_Option_1

regular follow up

of cultural early

indicators to

escape before

onset of flooding

Comment_1

Cultural early

indicators have

becoming promising

to save the life of the

community, crop and

livestock damage.

Work_Option_2

Follow early

warning

information from

government and

NGOs and

evacuate

livestock and

community

before flooding

on set.

Comment_2

Good communication is

available

Work_Option_3

KOLA KEJA

Practice crop

farming however

crop productivity

about every year

due to drought.

Due to rising price of

crops from time to

time (goat -grain

exchange rise) and

depletion of livestock

resources and

produce owing to

administrating of

pasture land due to

rain shortage.

Selling of

livestock for

grain purchase

waiting good

market seasons

and saving money

for bad times.

Grain-goat

(grain-money)

purchasing is becoming

hard or expensive during

dry seasons and

affecting PA resources

by external traders. At

this time great change

by this activity.

searching good

market points for

livestock sell and

grain purchase

Comment_3

Some livestock

owners have

becoming

livestock

market

oriented and

getting

common price

offer for their

produce and

also their need

from market.

This activity is

promising.

255

Page 4 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Alternative Livelihood Sources - Alternative livelihood sources suggested by the community

Kebele Name

Work_Option_1

Comment_1

Work_Option_2

Comment_2

Work_Option_3

Comment_3

QUARO

LALA

Using early

warning indicators

(cultural) and

announce for the

community if

there is threat of

flooding

We have better early

warning indicators

and we have got good

response.

Shifting of

livestock to safe

grazing areas

before flooding

No precaution for

hunger but for

livestock disease,

we purchased

drugs against ccpp

and we have sent

livestock for

vaccination of

anthrax before

driving to disease

source areas(dry

season grazing

areas)

for several years back

we have not had any

precaution for hunger

but we have been

offered livestock for

vaccination to protect

them from death of

anthrax at disease

source areas(dry

season areas)

forward

application for

woreda

administration

office to get fuel

support for

motorized boat

we have saved

households

utensils from

damage since

we get support

from

government

(boat and fuel

support)

256

Page 5 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Alternative Livelihood Sources - Alternative livelihood sources suggested by the community

Kebele Name

ERIYA

Work_Option_1

Comment_1

We do not have

any precaution for

hunger, but for

livestock feed and

water shortages,

we search for

pasture and water

sources

Hunger is beyond the

capacity of

community b/c it

affects all community

members regardless

of livestock

resources. Therefore

we didnt have any

precaution measures

for food shortage in

the previous hazards

and we will not have

for future as well.

Work_Option_2

Comment_2

Work_Option_3

BESSA MEJAN

Tending livestock

splitting at

different grazing

and water points

to protect our

resource from

looting and death

due to drought

and disease

Saving relief

grain giving

priority for

children.

Comment_3

257

Page 6 of 7

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Capacity: Alternative Livelihood Sources - Alternative livelihood sources suggested by the community

Kebele Name

Work_Option_1

Comment_1

Work_Option_2

Comment_2

Work_Option_3

GEDBAK

Storing food grain

which harvested

at good seasons

for hunger

seasons

At current condition

all community

members informed on

storing food grain at

good harvest seasons

to prevent households

from hunger.

ASELE

Looking for water

and pasture in

other areas during

dry season

This is the only

measure for our

community to save

livestock

WENBAYNO

There were no

precautions taken

by households to

prevent from

negative impacts

of drought.

all disaster negative

impacts which has

happened in the PA

were and will be

beyond the capacity

of the

communitywide (rain

shortage and its

consequences)

Comment_3

258

Page 7 of 7

WDRP Indicators

Community

Perceptions and Suggestions

259

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Agricultural Situation: Access to Extension - Perception of the community on

Access to Agricultural extension Services

Current_Level

Change_In_Last_Decade

Comments

HEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

ADAMIE

SHANKO 2

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

Good access for there are

two DAs in the kebele

Loss agricultural extension

services

There is good access on

government agricultural

extension services, better

than before condition das

are assigned in the PA and

they have been visiting every

months

There is irregular

agricultural extension

service by government

There is an access of

agricultural extension by

government Better than the

last 10 years

There is an access of

agricultural extension

service from government and

NGOs

There is good access for

agricultural extension

service by government and

NGOs

There is an access of

agricultural extension

service

Increase

There is no as such

prominent change on

agricultural services from

before

There is regular extension

service better than the last

decades

There are 3 DAs assigned for

disciplines (plant, animal

and natural resource

department)

DAs are assigned in the PA

since 1994

To allocate high budget

for those who give the

services for the

community

There are assigned DAs in

the PA ,but there were no

any DA before 10 years

except on and off services

given by agricultural

office experts

We get animal health

services in the PA and

other agricultural

technical aids

260

Page 1 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Agricultural Situation: Access to Extension - Perception of the community on

Access to Agricultural extension Services

Current_Level

Change_In_Last_Decade

Comments

QUARO

MURALE

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

LALA

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

There is good access of

agricultural extension and

training by both government

and NGO

It is better than before DAs

are assigned in the PA NGOs

(farm Africa) have giving

training for several

communities

There is agricultural

extension services especially

on livestock production and

natural resource

conservation

There is good access of

agricultural extension both

government and NGO (farm

Africa)

Agricultural extension

service by government is also

better than before These are

assigned DAs in the PA

Good access of agricultural

extension by government

There is good access of

agricultural extension in

both government and NGOs

There are more assigned

development agents better

than the previous years

Before 10 years there was

no agricultural extension

service in the areas

At current condition there

are assigned DAs in the PA

who were not before

There is great change on

access of agricultural

extension

There is good access of

agricultural extension

services by the government

better than before

261

Agricultural extension

services should be

strengthened by trained

many power

Before 10 years there

were not da in PA as

though on and off

agricultural extension

service has been given by

government and NGOs

Page 2 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Agricultural Situation: Access to Extension - Perception of the community on

Access to Agricultural extension Services

Current_Level

Change_In_Last_Decade

Comments

ASELE

At current condition, there is

better access to agricultural

extension services by

government and NGOs than

before 10 years situation,

however changes are

insignificant due to high

resistance from community’s

side

262

Page 3 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

HEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO 2

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

QUARO

LALA

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

ASELE

MURALE

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Agricultural Situation: Access to Inputs - Perception of the community on access

to improved agricultural inputs

Current_Level

Change_In_Last_Decade

Comments

Inputs are accessible but the

community does not use due

to low awareness

Low access to improved

agricultural Inputs

Inputs are accessible but the

community does not use due

to low awareness

Inputs are accessible but the

community does not use due

to low awareness

There is access but

utilization is very poor

No important for this

community

No significance importance of

this area

There is an access but the

land is fertile which does not

need fertilizer

There is an access of

agricultural inputs

No utilization except seeds at

some level

There is access but

utilization is very poor

There is less access of

agricultural inputs

There is better access than

before, but utilization is poor

There is good access, but we

do not use due to high

fertility of our soil

Decreased

Do not use due to shortage

of rain

No change

To create awareness

263

Page 1 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

ERBORE

GEDBAK

ASELE

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Agricultural Situation: Access to Inputs - Perception of the community on access

to improved agricultural inputs

Current_Level

There is an access of seeds

better than before, but it is

no sufficient and not supplied

on time There is also

shortage of pesticides as

before

There is less access of

agricultural inputs

There is better access than

before, but they didnt put to

use owing to despairing on

deterioration of rain fall and

environmental condition

Change_In_Last_Decade

Comments

264

Page 2 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

Agricultural Situation: Water for irrigation - Access to water for irrigation in the

community

Current_Level

Change_In_Last_Decade

Comments

HEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO 2

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

QUARO

ERBORE

KOLA KEJA

LALA

ERIYA

MRSHA

ASELE

There is no access of water

for irrigation

No access

There is no any permanent

water to be used for

irrigation

No water for irrigation

No access of water for

irrigation

No access of water for

irrigation

No access to water for

irrigation

There is temporary water

suitable for irrigation

There is seasonal water

which can be put to use for

irrigation purpose

There is no access irrigation

in the PA

No any type of permanent

water to be used for

irrigation purpose

No water source

No access for irrigation at

all

No access of water for

irrigation

No change in decades

No rivers

No permanent water in the

There is no permanent water

source in the PA or vicinity

There is no permanent water

source in the PA

No permanent water source

in the area

The water level is reducing

due to irrigation farm

expansion at high land and

low land areas

Since 2000 it becomes dry

with in short period of wet

seasons but before it stays

for months

No change in terms of

irrigation access

No permanent water resource

in the PA

It was seasonal because of rain

shortage

265

Page 1 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

KebeleName

GEDBAK

MURALE

KOLA KEJA

Agricultural Situation: Water for irrigation - Access to water for irrigation in the

community

Current_Level

No access water for

irrigation and the land scape

is not suitable also for

irrigation farming as though

there is all weather springs

that drains b/n mountains

There is seasonal water

which can be put to use for

irrigation purpose

There is no access irrigation

in the PA

Change_In_Last_Decade

Since 2000 it becomes dry

with in short period of wet

seasons but before it was

stayed for a months and it

has had a good source of

water

Comments

266

Page 2 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Agricultural Situation: Water Availability for Livestock - Water availability for

livestock in the community

KebeleName

Current_Level

Change_In_Last_Decade

Comments

HEDBAK

SHANKO

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

QUARO

KOLA KEJA

ERIYA

MRSHA

Good access

It was seasonal b/c of

rain shortage

There is high shortage of

water for livestock

There is shortage of

water for domestic

animals

Access of water for domestic

animals is obtained from the

next village

Decreased

In the previous years (before

15 years there was better

water source in temporary

sandy river)

Subsurface water in

temporary sandy rivers is

diminishing

Water sources for

livestock are temporary

sandy rivers

It is depleting due to

shortage of rain fall

In wet season there is

good access, but during

dry there is shortage

Water resources is

depleting from time to

time

Temporary sandy rivers

There is high shortage of

water for livestock

Temporary rivers (sandy

rivers) have had water

sources at near depth before

Water resources in temporary

sandy rivers are reducing due

to recurrent drought effects

Temporary sandy rivers are

becoming dry due to

prolonged dry season

There are three

Water source is diminishing

in temporary sandy rivers

due to recurrent drought

Before (10 to 15 years ago)

water was available at near

depth of temporary sandy

rivers but now days there is

no water in near depth

Before 10 to 15 years there

was water source at depth

of 1 to 2 meters in sandy

rivers, but now it is at

depth of 4 to 5 meters

Additional deep wells

should be established to

mitigate water shortage

Before 10 to 20 years there

was plenty of surface water

in seasonal sandy rivers

267

Page 1 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Agricultural Situation: Water Availability for Livestock - Water availability for

livestock in the community

KebeleName

DEGA KEJA

ADAMIE

SHANKO 2

MURALE

ERBORE

LALA

Current_Level

There is water source in

temporary sandy rivers

There is huge water

source

There is access of water

for domestic animals as

before, but the only

change is the depletion

of sub surface water

owing to recurrent

drought (rain shortage)

There is season access,

but it is depleting in dry

seasons owing irrigation

farm extension on the

beside Woito river at

other areas

There is seasonal access,

but during peak dry

seasons, water source

will be at distant areas or

digging of temporary

river (Woito) at depth of

3 to 5 metres to get

water

At current condition

there is high shortage of

water for livestock more

than 60% livestock are

derived to grazing and

watering points owing to

shortage

Change_In_Last_Decade

They dig at a depth of 3 to 4

meters to get water the

water source is diminishing

from time to time due to

shortage of rain fall

No change

Comments

268

Page 2 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indictor:

Agricultural Situation: Water Availability for Livestock - Water availability for

livestock in the community

KebeleName

Current_Level

Change_In_Last_Decade

Comments

GEDBAK

ASELE

There is good access of

spring water for

livestock; however it is

depleting from time to

time owing to increasing

deforestation of stream

sources

There is no sufficient

access to water for

domestic animals- 80% of

the livestock are tending

at distant areas due to

shortage of water in their

PA swatter sources in

temporary river is also

diminishing

269

Page 3 of 3

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

Kebele Name

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Agricultural Situation: Soil Fertility - Perception of the community on soil fertility

and its change over time

Current_Level

Change_In_Last_Decade

Comments

HEDBAK

It is losing its fertility

Rocky due to soil erosion

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO 2

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

SHESHA GOYKE

QUARO

MURALE

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

ERIYA

MRSHA

Decrease from year to year

The land is losing its

fertility year to year

Soil fertility is depleting

rapidly due to

deforestation

Soil fertility is reduced

Soil fertility is poor and

becoming sandy

Soil fertility is reducing as

a result of deforestation

The PA soil is fertile and

suitable for crop

production

Very fertile

Soil fertility is decreasing

due to increased flooding

The soil of this PA didnt

lost its fertility

Decreasing rapidly

Soil fertility is decreasing

Decreased

At current condition a

certain farm land is not

used for cropping due to

erosion

Almost most part of the PA

is cleared off for

agricultural activities

without sufficient yield

There is great change

within 15 years on soil

fertility

Many large trees have cut

down for different purposes

The same sense as the

above

No change

Several gullies are forming

due to natural resource

deterioration

Regular change of farm

places becomes usual due

to depletion of soil fertility

Soil fertility is decreasing

due to high run off as the

result of deforestation

So the flood brings fertile

soil at high land areas

Natural resource

conservation works should

be increased

Many trees, bushes and

shrubs have been cut

without replacing

270

Page 1 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

Kebele Name

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Agricultural Situation: Soil Fertility - Perception of the community on soil fertility

and its change over time

Current_Level

Change_In_Last_Decade

Comments

ADAMIE

LALA

GEDBAK

ASELE

good

The crop land has lost its

fertility due to rapid

deforestation and

increased run off from

mountain areas to plain

areas.

At current condition the

fertility of soil is reduced

too much and has great

difference from previous

fertility.

Soil fertility is also

reducing from year to year

as the increasing of

environmental temp and

deforestation.

The same sense as the

above

271

Page 2 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Economic Vulnerability: Change in Agricultural Situation - Households perception

on changes of crop type, size of cultivated area and crop yields

Proportion of households reporting change in crops grown

Adequate irrigation available

88.60

1st

2nd

3rd

1.43

0.00

Adequate rainfall

11.40

4.17

0.00

Insufficient irrigation available

1.43

0.00

Less rainfall

64.30

8.33

0.00

More drought resistant crop

1.43

4.17

8.33

More yielding crop

20.00

25.00

8.33

Proportion of households reporting change in size of area cultivated

95.90 %

Adequate fertilizer

1st

2nd

3rd

0.63

1.16

0.00

Adequate irrigation available

9.38

6.98

5.70

Better yielding crop

0.63

14.00

3.80

Insufficient rainfall

33.13

14.00

1.90

Landslides

0.63

1.16

19.00

Water logging

0.63

2.33

19.00

Proportion of households reporting change in crop yield

Adequate fertilizer

97.30

1st

2nd

3rd

0.20

47.50

0.00

272

Page 1 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indictor:

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Economic Vulnerability: Change in Agricultural Situation - Households perception

on changes of crop type, size of cultivated area and crop yields

1st

2nd

3rd

Adequate irrigation available

0.20

2.79

0.00

Adequate rainfall

14.00

3.91

5.00

Better yielding crop

1.60

19.00

35.00

Improved variety of seeds

0.40

26.30

50.00

Insufficient rainfall

84.00

0.56

10.00

273

Page 2 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: General Land Quality - Perceptions of the community

on changes in the general quality of land over a decade

KebeleName

Current_Situation

Change_Last_Decade

Comment

GEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO

MRSHA

MINOGELTI

ERBORE

KOLA KEJA

The PA land is losing its

fertility due to farm

extension by

The quality of the land is

decreasing from year to

year

The quality of the land is

decreasing from year to

year

The quality of the land is

decreasing

The quality of land is

decreasing in terms of

pasture land

The land quality is poor

almost all parts of the PA

land is

"The quality of the land is

reducing due to

deforestation and

"The quality of the land is

good except encroachment

of some

Quality of land is

decreasing especially

grazing land

Decreased

Due to deforestation

Due to loss of fertility vast

area of pasture and browsing

land has been cleared and

affected for farm expansion

and settlements without

sufficient crop yield

2/4 of the PA land is cleared

for farm extension

"There were plenty of grass

types which filled all pasture

land

Many areas cleared off

for farm expansion due

to increasing settlements

Due to diminishing of grass

soil erosion is increasing

from time to time

Unless soil and water

conservation works

initiated many grazing

places become gully

274

Page 1 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: General Land Quality - Perceptions of the community

on changes in the general quality of land over a decade

KebeleName

ERBORE

Current_Situation

The quality of the land is

good

LALA

The quality of land is very

poor and degraded

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

ASELE

Reducing due to increased

deforestation and run off

The quality of land use

system is decreasing

The quality of land is

reduced and over utilized

"The quality of the land is

reducing owing to

continuous

Change_Last_Decade

Good due to every year

flooding of woito river

leaving which is eroded from

high lands

As the community say, if

current condition there is

change on quality of land

When compared with the last

20 years

it is decreased by 40 to 50%

Deforestation increasing

from time to time, soil

erosion increasing

There is great change on the

quality of land due to losing

its fertility

Comment

Farm land extension

without crop harvest,

increasing settlements,

pasture degradation

275

Page 2 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

GEDBAK

SHANKO

MRSHA

MINOGELTI

ERBORE

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: Changes in Landscape - Changes observed by the

community on landscape and the problems due to the changes

Changes_Observed

Problems_Due_To_Changes

"All terrain areas were

covered with bushes and

shrubs farm lands before

10 years

"The land use over last

decade was very less

because of soil fertility

loss, shortage

Many plain areas have

become ups and downs,

gullies, and gorges

"Plain and good pasture

areas are becoming gullies

and undulating due to

"The land cover is

decreasing owing to cut

off much large trees which

were used for

"The land cover is

decreasing because of

deforestation for

settlement purposes and

"The land cover by forest

is reducing; many places

are becoming gully due to

over

"Soil erosion and soil

fertility is increasing from

time to time due to grass

land

"There is no much change

on land scape of the area,

but there is great change

Damage of farm places, damage of pasture

276

Page 1 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

KebeleName

LALA

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

ASELE

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Environmental Situation: Changes in Landscape - Changes observed by the

community on landscape and the problems due to the changes

Changes_Observed

Problems_Due_To_Changes

"Land cover declining and

changes of land scape are

the main changes of the

area It

"The area was covered by

dense forest before 10 to

15 years but now it

becomes bare

Diminishing of various

grasses, range land

encroachment, loss of wild

life

"There is great change on

land use and land cover All

forest places, bushes and

"There is great change on

the land cover- almost 70%

of the PA forest and

bushes

"Reduced livestock produce and income, long

distance travel for search of livestock

277

Page 2 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Interventions: Community Perception on Mediums to Influence DRM Actors - Community perception on the

effectiveness of institutional channels to use to influence DRM actors

Institution_1

Process_Description

Institution_2 Process_Description

Institution_3

Process_Description

GEDBAK

SHANKO

community elders

to wereda

administration

office

Community elders

to eoreda

pertinent

organizations.

Community elders

and wereda

administration office

representatives have

to contact at kebele

level.

Community elders

have contact with

governmental and

NGO body

representative.

Community elders

and pertinent

organization

representatives shall

meet at community

level.

wereda

administration

office to zonal

administration

office

wereda

administration office

to forward community

issues to zonal level

government officials.

Governmental

and NGO

responsible.

Affecting discussion

they made at

community level NGO

representative.

wereda

pertinent

organizations

to zonal.

Pertinent

organizations

representatives

handle community

issues and forward to

zonal level

organizations.

278

Page 1 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Community Perception on Mediums to Influence DRM Actors - Community perception on the

effectiveness of institutional channels to use to influence DRM actors

Kebele Name

MRSHA

MINOGELTI

Institution_1

Community elders

have to contact

with pertinent

organizations

representatives of

the wereda.

communities

representatives

with wereda

government

and/or NGOs

Process_Description

Community elders

representatives or

PA chairman have to

contact either with

zonal or regional

bureaus regarding

the level and type of

diseaster.

Before the

implementation or

plan of development

activities (against

disasters)

community elders

have to contact with

pertinent wereda

NGOs and

government for

getting approval.

Institution_2 Process_Description

wereda

government

and NGO

representative

s with zonal or

regional

bureaus.

Institution_3

governments

and/or NGOs

with zonal or

regional

pertinent govt.

After consensus with

community elders

pertinent worked

government and NGOs

contact with zonal

offices that concern

the issue.

Process_Description

279

Page 2 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Community Perception on Mediums to Influence DRM Actors - Community perception on the

effectiveness of institutional channels to use to influence DRM actors

Kebele Name

MINOGELTI

Institution_1

Communities with

government and

NGOs

representatives at

PA level.

Process_Description

Pertinent

development

organization

(government and

NGOs) contact with

PA community at

level and the

wereda government

and /or NGO contact

zone.

Institution_2 Process_Description

Government

and NGOs with

zones or

regions.

Concerned

government contact

with concerned

bureaus at regional

level.

Institution_3

Process_Description

280

Page 3 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Community Perception on Mediums to Influence DRM Actors - Community perception on the

effectiveness of institutional channels to use to influence DRM actors

Kebele Name

ERBORE

Institution_1

The same previous

contact channels

should continue.

Process_Description

During the incidence

the PA community

representatives

contact with PA

development agents

and the PA

development agents

contact with wereda

pastoral

development office

and then the office

contact with zonal

or regional early

warning response

and food security

work process. If the

condition becoming

worse, the wereda

PDO contact with

NGOs to get logistic

support from them.

Institution_2 Process_Description

Institution_3

Process_Description

281

Page 4 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Community Perception on Mediums to Influence DRM Actors - Community perception on the

effectiveness of institutional channels to use to influence DRM actors

Kebele Name

KOLA KEJA

Institution_1

the PA

representatives

contact to wereda

PDO and /or WAO

Process_Description

PA community

representatives

should have to

contact with wereda

pastoral

development office

and wereda NGO

which is working on

risk management.

Institution_2 Process_Description

wereda PDO to

zonal and or

regional

wereda PDO ought to

contact with zonal

and/or regional early

warning work

process.

Institution_3

Process_Description

282

Page 5 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Community Perception on Mediums to Influence DRM Actors - Community perception on the

effectiveness of institutional channels to use to influence DRM actors

Kebele Name

ERBORE

Institution_1

No problem on

channels or

contact of places

with concerned

organizations.

Process_Description

There was both ways

contact. Community

elders or members

with wereda

concerned

organization

representatives and

NGO

representatives,

there has been

contact with

regional and zonal

concerned

government

organization

representatives

about flood disasters

and settlement to

flood risk free areas.

Institution_2 Process_Description

Institution_3

Process_Description

283

Page 6 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Community Perception on Mediums to Influence DRM Actors - Community perception on the

effectiveness of institutional channels to use to influence DRM actors

Kebele Name

LALA

ERIYA

MRSHA

Institution_1

community elders

forward their

issues directly to

zonal and or

regional

concerned bodies

Community and

organization

representatives at

PA (community

level).

community

representatives to

government and

NGOs

Process_Description

Contacts were made

at community level

with government

officials and NGO

representatives, but

there are many

issues that didnt get

response for many

years.

community elders

should contact with

government and

NGO representatives

at kebele level and

concerned

government and

NGO representatives

contact at zone

level

Community

representatives

(elders) contact

with government

and NGO regarding

their PA issues.

Institution_2 Process_Description

Institution_3

wereda

organizations

at zonal level

government

and NGOs to

zones

Government and

NGOs pass

communities issues to

zonal pertinent

organizations.

Process_Description

284

Page 7 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Interventions: Community Perception on Mediums to Influence DRM Actors - Community perception on the

effectiveness of institutional channels to use to influence DRM actors

Institution_1

Process_Description

Institution_2 Process_Description

Institution_3

Process_Description

GEDBAK

ASELE

Community elders

have to contact

with wereda

administration

office of PA.

Community

representatives

with government

and NGO

representatives at

PA level.

Selected community

elders have to

contact with wereda

administration office

representatives at

kebele level.

Community

representatives and

concerned

government

organizations

representative

should have to

contact at PA level.

wereda

administration

office to zonal

administration

office

wereda

administration office

to forward community

issues to zonal level

government officials.

NGO and

government

representative

s submit

community

issues to zonal

level

government

officials.

Concerned

government officials

forward communities

issues to zonal level

government officials.

285

Page 8 of 8

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Community Perception on their Knowledge used in DRM Process -

Perception of the community on how their knowledge influences the priorities

and measures of DRM actors

KebeleName

Community_Suggestions

ASELE

DEGA KEJA

ERBORE

ERIYA

GEDBAK

KOLA KEJA

LALA

MINOGELTI

Some NGOs, like farm Africa have given great value and place for our suggestion

and Knowledge during some activities planning that the organization implemented

in the PA, but for others they dont give value for our suggestions and knowledge.

NGOs working in our locality give priority for our suggestions and knowledge, but

government institutions do not give value.

Both organizations have not any problem on implementation of community

suggestions and knowledge to protect the community from flooding incidence. The

only problem is negligence of the community after flooding disasters passed.

Government and NGO usually accept our suggestions and knowledge, and they have

also tried to implement activities based on community’s idea, but the only problem

is negligence of more community members in the PA to support this organization to

materialized planned activities on time.

Our suggestions have great places and value at current condition, particularly NGOs

have been implementing activities based on our knowledge and suggestion.

NGOs working in our locality give priority for our suggestions and knowledge, but

government institutions do not give value.

At current condition NGOs give great attention for our suggestions and knowledge.

They have been implementing some activities based on our knowledge and

suggestion as well.

At this time many development works, hazard preventing and precaution methods

and responses are going on the wishes of communities however there are many un

touched problems and more to be done according to the need and plan of the

community. Farm Africa has more experience on working risk management

activities based on the knowledge and influence of community.

Our knowledge and suggestions have great value and acceptance by NGOs but

intention is given by government organizations.

Usually NGOs have great outlook for community’s suggestions and knowledge and

give priority for community’s knowledge rather than their idea. Therefore if

governments follow their (MGOs) experience promising changes will be recorded.

NGOs and some government offices give priority for our suggestions and knowledge,

therefore on most activities that have been conducting regarding disasters by

government and NGOs, community’s knowledge have had great value and influence.

286

Page 1 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Community Perception on their Knowledge used in DRM Process -

Perception of the community on how their knowledge influences the priorities

and measures of DRM actors

KebeleName

Community_Suggestions

MRSHA

SHANKO

WENBAYNO

Community suggestions and knowledge has great influence on preventing measures

of disasters, particularly NGOs give priority for our suggestions to resolve disasters.

We hope for future more to be done as the knowledge and priority of the

community, even though there are some promising measures have been taking on

the NGO side.

NGOs working in our locality give priority for our suggestions and knowledge, but

government institutions do not give value.

At current condition our suggestion and knowledge have great place and

development alternatives have been implementing as the wishes of the community.

287

Page 2 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to improve preparedness - Interventions suggested by the community to development

actors to improve preparedness in the area

KebeleName

Measure 1

Comment 1

Measure 2

Comment 2

Measure 3

Comment 3

GEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

We need solutions for

usual problems

Relief for all community

during risk management.

Supply of food aid for

non PSNP beneficiaries.

There is no animal health

service in the PA many

shoats has been dying due

to lack of treatment

.animal health services

farthest 56 km from the

PA.

Ignoring our culture relief

has been allocated for

some beneficiaries

during hunger seasons non

PSNP beneficiaries are the

most vulnerable and they

also share PSNP

beneficiaries .this sharing

activities has been also

affected PSNP

beneficiaries and

affecting the recovery of

effort of them.

Frequent animal

health services,

available of sufficient

human drugs in the

clinics.

supply of livestock

disease and human

beings,

Provision of sufficient

livestock drugs and

establishment of

animal health

services.

288

During supply and

water

establishment

activities are vital

activities for

areas.

During every

outbreak of

livestock diseases

drug shortages

were the main

problems for rapid

response as the

information we

have had from

animal health

workers.

Page 1 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to improve preparedness - Interventions suggested by the community to development

actors to improve preparedness in the area

KebeleName

Measure 1

Comment 1

Measure 2

Comment 2

Measure 3

Comment 3

SHANKO

MRSHA

MINOGELTI

Supply of treatment and

vaccination drugs.

Seek solution for newly

introduced disaster

Supply of veterinary

drugs and frequent

follow up.

Usually response is

delayed when un

expected livestock disease

outbreak occurred.

Newly introduced hazards

have becoming beyond

the community capacity;

therefore they have to

seek solution for them

rather than us.

Livestock health problems

affected the community in

different ways such as

high cost of drugs, loss

due to death, impaired

food grain exchange, less

offer of prices.

Establish sustainable

disaster prevention

measures as drinking

water development,

range land habitation,

strengthening animal

health services.

Supply of relief to

reduce food shortage

Recurrent drought

effects (feed and

watering points

shortage) are still

un touched

activities which

are the main

bottle neck for

community

livelihood.

shortage of food

grain is

diminishing

livestock resource

year to year

,therefore we

need help from

govt.

289

Page 2 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to improve preparedness - Interventions suggested by the community to development

actors to improve preparedness in the area

KebeleName

MINOGELTI

ERBORE

Measure 1

Supply support for poor.

Support for maintenance

of temporary

settlements.

Comment 1

During drought the poor

are the most vulnerable to

food shortage as though

the well-being support at

some time.

After flooding we shift our

families to temporary

settlement areas without

damaging our properties.

Measure 2

Establish water

sources (for livestock

and human drinking)

Support of food

items.

Comment 2

Drinking water for

livestock and

human being is

becoming the

main problem of

the community

from time to

time.

This month is

harvest season, so

if the crop is

damaged before

harvest there is no

food grain for our

family until the

next crop season.

Measure 3

Comment 3

290

Page 3 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to improve preparedness - Interventions suggested by the community to development

actors to improve preparedness in the area

KebeleName

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

Measure 1

Aware the community to

produce livestock fodder

and crop using small

irrigation.

Supply of additional

motorized boat and fuel.

Comment 1

Rain fed agriculture is

becoming despair in this

area from time to time

due to erratic rain fall.

No alternative except

evacuating flooding and

return to usual settlement

after flood reside.

Measure 2

Improve the available

range land to improve

pasture land.

Supply of mosquito

net to prevent from

malaria.

Comment 2

Although there is

vast (vacant

pasture land

without grass) for

search of grazing

is increasing due

poor management

and bush

encroachment of

pasture land.

After flooding

there is high

mosquito attack,

so to prevent the

community from

infection of

malaria, supply of

mosquito net is

crucial.

Measure 3

Comment 3

291

Page 4 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to improve preparedness - Interventions suggested by the community to development

actors to improve preparedness in the area

KebeleName

MRSHA

ERIYA

MRSHA

Measure 1

Supply of vaccination

and treatment of drugs.

Comment 1

Usually there is shortage

of vaccines and drugs

during occurrence of

anthrax.

On time supply of vet

and human drugs to

prevent and control

disease outbreak.

Shortage of drug during

outbreak of livestock

disease

Livestock and human

drugs should be available

at all times for rapid

response.

During livestock and

human disease

occurrence, responses

couldnt give as the wish

or need of the community

on time.

Measure 2

Regular visit and

conduct animal

health services at dry

season grazing areas.

During food shortage

seasons all herders

have to be given

relief rather than

screening

Close follow up

should be made

Comment 2

There is no

regular health

service at dry

season grazing

areas. Services

have been given

when out breaks

occurred.

Therefore regular

health services

reduce death

rates and

distribution

This activity has

been affected the

usual cooperation

level b/n the poor

and well-being.

if close followups

are made

regularly ,we will

get relief

responses from

government

Measure 3

Comment 3

292

Page 5 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to improve preparedness - Interventions suggested by the community to development

actors to improve preparedness in the area

KebeleName

Measure 1

Comment 1

Measure 2

Comment 2

Measure 3

Comment 3

GEDBAK

ASELE

WENBAYNO

Supply of drugs and

establishment of health

institutions.

Prepare regular

discussion forums and

reconciliation

Supply of veteterinary

drugs

Due to lack of health

institutions in the PA,

many livestock have been

affected during disease

out breaks.

As the previous

experiences, regular

discussion forums reduce

conflict level and loss of

lives.

To save the livestock

On time relief food

supply.

Food grain support.

Supply of

supplementary and

relief food.

Relief supply is

delayed during

hunger seasons, if

dole out after we

lost our assets.

The price of grains

is very high

293

Page 6 of 6

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to DRM Actors in the Area - Community suggested measures to DRM actors in the area

for effective DRM actions

Kebele Name Measure 1

Comment 1

Measure 2

Comment 2

Measure 3

GEDBAK

SHANKO

Community

suggestions and

knowledge have to

get great place to

deal and find

solutions for

disasters.

Communities

have better

knowledge on

disasters

Animal health

institutions, animal

health workers and

drugs have to be

availed to reduce

death of livestock.

Participation and

self-responsibility of

the community.

The community

can be identifying

their problems

more than out

sides.

food for work cash

during drought season

There is great

problem in animal

health services, No

animal health

service in the

kebele and the

nearest is 56 km

far from the PA.

This project can

support the

community

problems drought

time.

livestock

vaccinations have

to be conducted

annually like

other areas to

reduce livestock

loss particularly

drought

power(drought

oxen)

Establish

sustainable

drinking water

sources.

Comment 3

livestock

vaccination was

not given for

years

294

Page 1 of 10

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to DRM Actors in the Area - Community suggested measures to DRM actors in the area

for effective DRM actions

Kebele Name

DEGA KEJA

Measure 1

Disasters causes and

best remedies for

disasters should be

identified with the

collaboration of

community

government and

NGOs.

Comment 1

Without

identification of

disasters and

causes with

community

participation,

solutions will not

be success full

and hit their

target.

Measure 2

Community knowledge

and suggestions should

be given priority.

Comment 2

Communities have

very well known

the courses and

solutions of each

disaster except

livestock and

human disease

unexpected out

breaks and

solutions for it.

Measure 3

livestock

development and

problems have to

be overcome

first,

SHANKO

Introduce cash and

food for work

projects and

participate all the

community to

reduce income loss

of participants (loss

by sharing for

others)

As the experience

of PSNP

beneficiary’s food

and cash for work

projects have

significant

importance on

reducing hunger

and other

households

problems.

Support petty trading

groups and strengthen

cooperatives.

Petty trading and

cooperatives have

become better

income generating

means as some

experiences seen

in the PA.

Comment 3

Because of

livestock is main

stay of the

community for

decades.

295

Page 2 of 10

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to DRM Actors in the Area - Community suggested measures to DRM actors in the area

for effective DRM actions

Kebele Name

MRSHA

Measure 1

Government and

NGO organizations

are making much

support in

preventing

disasters, the only

problem is frequent

change of the

environment

condition.

Comment 1

There is good

initiation on some

development

activities as

water

development

activities to

overcome water

shortage.

Measure 2

Comment 2

Measure 3

MINOGELTI

Improve food for

work and cash for

work activities.

Food for work

and cash for work

activities improve

the diminishing

resources owing

to recurrent rain

shortage effects

on community

and its resources.

continues supply for

poor to reduce burden

of well-being whom

become exhausting due

to continuous help for

penniless

If government and

NGOs help for poor

and medium

wealthy in

continuous way,

recovery from

drought effects

will be easy and

suitable.

Water point

development

activities should

be improved and

should touch all

PAs to reduce

burden of few

developed water

points.

Comment 3

There are only

two water points

(hand dug wells)

in the PA that

serve more than

4500 people in

minutely PA .so

to reduce the

burden of two

additional water

points have to be

established.

296

Page 3 of 10

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to DRM Actors in the Area - Community suggested measures to DRM actors in the area

for effective DRM actions

Kebele Name

MINOGELTI

Measure 1

NGOs have to supply

more money for

cultural association

that have promising

income from

tourism.

Comment 1

NGOs give more

priority for

community

knowledge and

have better

resources

including

transportation

facilities to

follow up

activities.

Measure 2

Government have to

strengthen water

development activities,

health services and

forage development

activities.

Comment 2

Government

offices have good

capacity to

implement

sustainable health

services, better

than NGOs.

Measure 3

ERBORE

Both institutions

have better

management

alternatives to

prevent and deal

with disasters

rather than our

suggestions.

They have been

training the

community

continuously how

to prevent and

deal with

disasters based

on community

initiatives (skill

and knowledge of

community)

Comment 3

297

Page 4 of 10

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to DRM Actors in the Area - Community suggested measures to DRM actors in the area

for effective DRM actions

Kebele Name

KOLA KEJA

Measure 1

government should

give fast response

for sustainable

agriculture system

(small irrigation)

Comment 1

We have been

practicing rain

fed agriculture to

support livestock

income but no

change for

decades due to

rain fall

deterioration

instead it is

becoming worse

and worse. So for

change practicing

small irrigation

for fodder and

crop production is

profitable for our

community.

Measure 2

NGOs should also

support the community

on small irrigation

farming for both crop

and fodder production.

Comment 2

Measure 3

Range land

management

activities should

be give priority to

save livestock

Comment 3

Range condition

is becoming

worse and worse

owing to bush

and un palatable

plant

encroachment,

although we have

suitable range

land for livestock

production.

298

Page 5 of 10

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to DRM Actors in the Area - Community suggested measures to DRM actors in the area

for effective DRM actions

Kebele Name

ERBORE

Measure 1

Establishment of

irrigation schemes

for crop farming to

avoid or reduce

crop damage by

flooding and food

grain shortage.

Comment 1

Unexpected

flooding has been

attacking for the

last two years

due to absence of

other alternatives

rather than flood

retreat

agriculture and

settlement to

river side.

Therefore

settlements to

flood safe areas

will be changed if

irrigation canal

established for

crop farming.

Measure 2

regular awareness

creation for

communities for

permanent settlement

of flood to safe areas

in the same PA

Comment 2

Communities are

reluctant for

permanent

settlement at flood

safe areas in the

same PA

Measure 3

Comment 3

299

Page 6 of 10

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to DRM Actors in the Area - Community suggested measures to DRM actors in the area

for effective DRM actions

Kebele Name

LALA

Measure 1

Supply of more

livestock drugs as

community needs,

disasters that have

been affecting the

community and

their effects should

have to be

identified with the

participation of this

community.

Comment 1

Usually drug

supports were not

sufficient and

potent enough to

recover sick

animals.

Measure 2

Each response with

regard to each disaster

effects have to

sustainable based on

community suggestions

and knowledge.

Comment 2

disasters and their

solutions shouldn’t

be properly

identified without

the participation

of the community

Measure 3

Responses have to

be also on time

before

community losses

their assets.

ERIYA

sufficient supply of

veterinary and

human drugs at

clinics before

disease out breaks

occurred

Mostly during

disease out

breaks responses

delayed until

essential drugs

transported and

purchased.

Provision of logistics

for vaccination and

mass treatment

activities.

Relief supply to

all community

members during

food shortage

rather without

screening.

Comment 3

Mostly responses

for each disaster

was delayed and

done after the

community lost

their resources

and it was not

also sufficient for

recovery.

300

Page 7 of 10

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to DRM Actors in the Area - Community suggested measures to DRM actors in the area

for effective DRM actions

Kebele Name

MRSHA

Measure 1

Activities should be

identified

separately for the

government and

NGOs

Comment 1

Measure 2

All agricultural

activities should be

accomplished by the

government including

human health works by

health office.

Comment 2

Activities that are

performed by

government

(agriculture and

health) have

content the

community as the

experiences.

Measure 3

Identification of

disaster and

responses except

relief works

should be done by

NGOs.

GEDBAK

Supply of drugs and

establishment of

health institution

with appropriate

health personals.

Lack of health

institution is the

main problem of

this community to

overcome human

and livestock

disease disasters.

Disasters and remedies

for disasters should be

identified with the

participation of

communities.

Communities have

better knowledge

to identify

disasters and

solutions better

than out sides.

Pesticides and

improved seeds

have to be

supplied on time

and sufficiently

to reduce yield

loss.

Comment 3

we have got good

responses on

preventing

disaster from

NGOs better than

government ,but

we have been

getting better

relief from govt.

Pests attack has

become the main

problem for loss

of yield.

301

Page 8 of 10

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to DRM Actors in the Area - Community suggested measures to DRM actors in the area

for effective DRM actions

Kebele Name

ASELE

Measure 1

There should be full

participation of all

community

members to identify

disasters and

solutions,

community

suggestion and

knowledge should

have get priority to

achieve preventing

plans.

Comment 1

Community know

very well the

causes of

disasters and

better solutions

as well.

Measure 2

Small irrigation

schemes should have to

be established at wait

river over flow to

overcome food grain

shortage.

Comment 2

There is seasonal

irrigation water

potential to put to

use for small scale

irrigation at Gola

area

Measure 3

Livestock drugs

should be

supplied and

health (livestock)

institutions have

to be established

in the PA.

Comment 3

There is no any

type of livestock

health institution

in the PA we

couldnt get

animal health

services at near

distance.

302

Page 9 of 10

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Interventions: Suggestions to DRM Actors in the Area - Community suggested measures to DRM actors in the area

for effective DRM actions

Kebele Name

WENBAYNO

Measure 1

Identified disasters

and solutions by

government and

NGOs

Comment 1

No relief

Measure 2

Activities should be

separately given for

governments and

NGOs.

Comment 2

NGOs come to our

village and aske

the problems of

water and feed

shortages and the

same questions

asked by the

government ,so

each should be

given its activities

to identify which

organizations has

done well and not.

Measure 3

Agricultural

activities (supply

of veterinary

drugs

,agricultural

inputs and

human health

service )

activities should

be done by

government

Comment 3

We have seen

many changes

and got good

responses on the

government side

on these

activities rather

than NGOs.

303

Page 10 of 10

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Community Suggestions to Improve Economic Situation - Community suggested measures

to improve the economic situation of the area

KebeleName

Measure 1

Comment 1

Measure 2

Comment 2

Measure 3 Comment 3

GEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO

MRSHA

Introducing cash and

food for work projects

Livestock production is

the main economic

activity that will

improve the life of the

community

Introduce cash and food

for work projects

cash and food for work

projects

Improve the pasture

condition of the area

Crop farming is

deteriorating and

affecting income sources

due to shortage of farm

land and rain

The environment is better

Improving

vegetables farming

at back yard

We have getting

better income

from selling

vegetables

Crop production

becomes high

The ecology is

good but there is a

shortage of rain

fall

Food and cash for work

projects are good to

improve income and

saving

Cash and food for work

projects help the

community

Improving livestock

production by

improving

management

system and range

land condition

including bee

keeping system

Petty trading

farming

cooperatives

improve animal

health service

304

There is suitable

environment for

keeping livestock

which is the best

income source for

this community

Protect large

trees

Page 1 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Community Suggestions to Improve Economic Situation - Community suggested measures

to improve the economic situation of the area

KebeleName

Measure 1

Comment 1

Measure 2

Comment 2

Measure 3 Comment 3

MINOGELTI

ERBORE

Increasing the member

of the beneficiaries in

cash for work and food

for work

program(increase the

number of PSNP

beneficiaries in the PA)

Help the community

through PSNP projects

Enhance crop

production using

seasonal irrigation

system

This is the only option for

this community if the

current condition

continues without

improvement therefore to

reduce more sale of

livestock for grain ,PSNP

beneficiaries should be

increased

Food purchasing is

depleting community’s

resource

Woito river is not

permanent river, so

seasonal irrigation system

is the only alternative to

improve crop failures

Frequent follow up

of conflicts that

will arise among

Borena, Dassenech

and hammer(to

reduce livestock

looting and to use

common grazing

and watering points

without dispute)

Aware the

community to

conserve natural

resources

Livestock fodder

improvement to

improve livestock

produce

The depletion of

natural resource is

becoming the main

case of livestock

resource depletion

Supply of

food grain at

fair prices or

at fair

goat-grain

exchange

Introduce

more food

and cash for

work projects

Less price

offer for

goats is

affecting the

main stay of

the

community

305

Page 2 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Community Suggestions to Improve Economic Situation - Community suggested measures

to improve the economic situation of the area

KebeleName

KOLA KEJA

ERBORE

LALA

Measure 1

Close and continuous

community awareness

about livestock

marketing

Comment 1

To lead sustainable life

and to reduce the means

of hazard

Crop and vegetable

farming using irrigation

(small scale irrigation)

Cash and food for work

projects

there is vast fertile

vacant land and

temporary running river

(woito) which have high

potential for irrigation

These activities save

livestock resources and

fill food gap

Measure 2

farm practice at

potential areas

(farming around

omo river by

irrigation)

farming of cash

crops(sesame)

Comment 2

To reduce the

level of hunger

and livestock loss

for medium class

herders

Measure 3

introduce

alternate

income

generating

activities to

the majority

of the

community(ca

sh or food for

work

activities)

Petty trading

in groups or

association

Comment 3

crop farming beside

permanent rivers

(omo river)

Rain fed

agriculture is

becoming

despairing due to

deterioration of

rain fall

Improve

livestock

production

system by

improving the

management

system

306

Page 3 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Community Suggestions to Improve Economic Situation - Community suggested measures

to improve the economic situation of the area

KebeleName

Measure 1

Comment 1

Measure 2

Comment 2

Measure 3 Comment 3

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

Improving the range

land condition to

improve livestock

produce which is the

main economic activity

of the community

The degrading natural

environment should be

improved (range land

management activities

should be given focus to

improve livestock

resource)

Livestock production

(productivity and

produce) is decreasing

due to pasture land

diminishing

Cash and food for work

projects

These projects are good

Improve natural

resource to

improve honey

production which is

also the main

income generating

means of pastoral

communities

Fodder saving and

production

activities should be

introduced in the

area

Rearing domestic

chicken

the area was rich

with many bee

flora before it

cleared off,

therefore if it

renewed ,honey

production will be

improved

to save livestock

life in bad

condition

Introduce

cash and food

for work

projects

awareness

should be

given for well

off to sell

their

livestock to

market at

good

conditions

Vegetable

farming at

back yard

over grazing

is one of the

causes of

range land

degradation

in the area

due to

resistance of

more wealthy

for livestock

market

307

Page 4 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Economic Vulnerability: Community Suggestions to Improve Economic Situation - Community suggested measures

to improve the economic situation of the area

KebeleName

ASELE

Measure 1

Cash and food for work

projects

Comment 1

This projects support the

community during peak

dry and shortage seasons

Measure 2

Crop farming using

Woito river over

flow

Comment 2

Some community

households are

practicing using

over flow and

harvesting better

yield

Measure 3 Comment 3

308

Page 5 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Community Awareness of Disaster Risk Management System and Actors

Wereda HAMER

Kebele Name

Institution 1 Responsibility

Activity Institution 2 Responsibility

Activity

Institution 3 Responsibility Activity

GEDBAK

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

Provide

agricultural

extension

services

Provide

animal

health

services,

provide

agricultur

extension

service

Health

office

Provide health

service

Provide

mosquito

net,

provide

child

vaccination

, and

provide

treatments

Catholic

church

support

health,

cooperative

and

education

office

Support

vaccinati

on,

program,

support

cooperati

ves,

support

alternati

ve basic

educatio

program

me (they

cover all

cost of

ABE

program

including

recur

renting

teachers

309

Page 1 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Community Awareness of Disaster Risk Management System and Actors

Wereda HAMER

Kebele Name

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

SHANKO

Institution 1 Responsibility

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

Supply animal

health

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

Provide

agricultural

services

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

Render

agricultural

services and

relief supply

Activity Institution 2

Supply

relief

during

food

shortage

Health

office

Provide

animal

health

services,

provide

relief, and

supply

seeds

Health

office

Supply

relief

during

drought,

provide

animal

health

services

PCDP

Responsibility

Provide

mosquito net

Provide health

service

Support the

community in

infrastructure

development

Activity

Supply

mosquito

net

Institution 3

Police and

justice

Responsibility

Protect

criminals

Activity

Prevent

the

conflict

Supply

mosquito

net,

conduct

child

vaccination

Water

resource

office

Establish

infrastruct

ures;

support

the

community

in cash for

work

projects

Health

office

Repair water

points

Repaired

water

points

(shallow

hand

pump

wells)

Provide

health

services

Conduct

child

vaccinati

on,

supply

mosquito

net

310

Page 2 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Community Awareness of Disaster Risk Management System and Actors

Wereda HAMER

Kebele Name

MRSHA

MINOGELTI

Institution 1 Responsibility

Farm Africa

Working on

disasters

prevention

activities

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

supply relief

and animal

health service

Activity Institution 2

Developin

g watering

points,

train food

security

committe

Pastoralist

developmen

t Office

Responsibility

Supply relief,

collect early

warning

indicators

Provide

relief,

treat

livestock,

and

collect

early

warning

indicators

Farm Africa

provide help for

poor women

Activity

Institution 3

Supply

food relief,

provide

veterinary

service

Health

office

Responsibility

Health

surveillance

and provide

health

service

Give

support for

poor

women

Health

office

Provide

health

services

Activity

Conduct

routine

vaccinati

on for

children,

supply

mosquito

net

Provide

health

services,

vaccinate

children

311

Page 3 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Community Awareness of Disaster Risk Management System and Actors

Wereda HAMER

Kebele Name

MINOGELTI

ERBORE

Institution 1 Responsibility

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

Agricultural

services and

relief supply

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

give response

for hazards

Activity

Supply

relief,

provide

animal

health

services

Institution 2

Farm Africa

Responsibility

Support during

hazards

Pass early

warning

informatio

n to the

communit

y, collect

early

warning

indicators

Farm Africa

give response

for hazards

Activity

Institution 3

supply

goats for

poor

women

,train early

warning

committee

Health

office

Train

kebele

food

security

committee

, collect

and

transmit

early

warning

indicators,

provide

fuel for

motorized

boat

Responsibility

Provide

health

services

Activity

Provide

health

services,

conduct

seasonal

vaccinati

ons,

provide

mosquito

net

312

Page 4 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Community Awareness of Disaster Risk Management System and Actors

Wereda HAMER

Kebele Name

Institution 1 Responsibility

Activity Institution 2 Responsibility

Activity

Institution 3 Responsibility Activity

KOLA KEJA

Early

warning

committee

submit weekly

early warning

reports

collect

early

warning

indicators

from each

villages in

wereda

early

warning WP

give response

for hazards

Collect and

submit

weekly and

monthly

early

warning

reports to

zone

Farm Africa

give response

for hazards

Train

early

warning

committe

e and

support

PA poor

by giving

seed

money

for petty

trading

and other

income

generatin

resources

Train

wereda

experts

and DA

313

Page 5 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Community Awareness of Disaster Risk Management System and Actors

Wereda HAMER

Kebele Name

ERBORE

LALA

Institution 1 Responsibility

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

Provide

agricultural

extension

services

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

Provide

agricultural

extension

services

Activity Institution 2

Provide

animal

health

services,

supply

seeds,

supply

relief

Health

office

Provide

agricultur

extension

services,

conduct

animal

treatment

and

vaccinatio

services,

supply

seed

Health

office

Responsibility

provide health

services

provide health

services

Activity

Institution 3 Responsibility

Provide

health

services,

supply

mosquito

net,

conduct

vaccination

Health

office

Regular

follow up of

health

condition

Provide

health

services,

supply

mosquito

net,

conduct

vaccination

Water

development

office

Repair water

points

Activity

Supply of

mosquito

net

Maintain

damaged

shallow

water

wells

314

Page 6 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Community Awareness of Disaster Risk Management System and Actors

Wereda HAMER

Kebele Name

ERIYA

MRSHA

GEDBAK

Institution 1 Responsibility

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

give respond to

hunger and

livestock

disease

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

Provide

agricultural

extension

services

Activity Institution 2

Collect

early

warning

indicators

distribute

relief

Farm Africa

Supply

food aid,

provide

agricultur

extension

services

Health

office

Responsibility

give response

for hazards

Provide health

service

Pastoralist

developmen

t office

Provide

agricultural

extension

services

Conduct

livestock

vaccinatio

n, supply

food aid,

supply

seed

Farm Africa

support kebele

early warning

committee

Activity

Institution 3

Train PA

food

security

committee

, supply

goats

Police and

justice

office

Responsibility

protect crime

and conflict

Activity

Train the

communi

ty about

the

effect of

crime

Conduct

child

vaccination

, supply

mosquito

net,

conduct

treatment

Train

kebele

early

warning

committee

, support

of vet

drugs,

supply

seed

Health

office

Provide

health

services

Supply of

mosquito

net,

conduct

child

vaccinati

on and

other

health

services

315

Page 7 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Community Awareness of Disaster Risk Management System and Actors

Wereda HAMER

Kebele Name

Institution 1 Responsibility

Activity Institution 2 Responsibility

Activity

Institution 3 Responsibility Activity

ASELE

Farm Africa

support the

community in

capacity

building

Train the

communit

y, how to

submit

early

warning

Pastoralist

developmen

t Office

Support the

community

Collect

early

warning

informatio

n and

supply

indicators

relief

316

Page 8 of 8

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Community Perception of DRM System and Actors - Perception of the community on the effectiveness of DRM

system in helping them to prevent, cope and recover from disasters

KebeleName

GEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

Prevention

All mentioned institutions

are far from the PA around

56 km. We didnt get fast

responses during hunger

and livestock disease

incidences. Therefore their

measured are not effective.

All the government sectors

and NGO activities have

helped the community on

preventing livestock

disease and malaria out

break and the organization

can protect from hunger.

Animal health services

,human health services and

support provided by Farm

Africa have helped the

community greatly to

prevent from disasters of

livestock and human

disease.

Coping

During hunger seasons and

human disease out breaks we

have got food aid and

treatments however food aid

was not sufficient for all the

community until the arrival

of good harvest.

Food aid, livestock

vaccination and treatment

activities child vaccination

and mosquito net supply.

Food aid and animal health

services during hunger and

disease out breaks have

backed the community.

Recovery

Except relief food all

activities didnt help the

community to recover

from livestock and human

element and drought

problem.

All the activities have had

great importance on

recovery phase.

Overall_Effectiveness

It is beyond our capacity to

evaluate government

organizations short falls to

achieve all activities on

time.

It is beyond over our

capacity about the

governmental policy.

All the above mentioned

activities were effective

except lack of response or

progress on recently

introduced sheep disease

which is new unspecific

and has high killing rate.

More activities have been

effective, even though we

have had some prevalence

on some activities as

screening for relief supply

(screening wealthy and

poor) and delay on animal

disease outbreak response)

317

Page 1 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Community Perception of DRM System and Actors - Perception of the community on the effectiveness of DRM

system in helping them to prevent, cope and recover from disasters

KebeleName

SHANKO

MRSHA

Prevention

Health office, animal

health services and cash for

work projects have helped

the community in

preventing from disasters

i.e. health services

(vaccination programmes

and mosquito net supply)

have prevented from

disease of livestock and

human. Cash for work

projects have also

prevented from hunger.

Mosquito net supply has

helped the community on

preventing malaria hazards,

but except for water

development activities and

animal health services,

hunger problems haven’t

got solution yet.

Coping

food aid supplies, cash for

work projects and curative

treatments for livestock

have helped in copping

hunger and disease disasters

No problem on relief work,

we have been getting all

resources that allocated by

the government, but the

main problem is

sustainability to get relief

from food shortage.

Recovery

Food supply have helped

in recovery from disasters

i.e. we have saved many

livestock from sale that

will help for the next

incidence

Overall_Effectiveness

We dont know why some

activities hadnt been

implemented as promised.

Therefore it is beyond our

capacity to evaluate why

some responses delayed

during disease outbreak

(both in livestock and

human)

We get relief on the time

of supply, but no

sustainable recovery.

The community have no the

capacity to identify short

falls of these organizations,

but our capacity is limited

only during the current

supply when problems

arises.

318

Page 2 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Community Perception of DRM System and Actors - Perception of the community on the effectiveness of DRM

system in helping them to prevent, cope and recover from disasters

KebeleName

MINOGELTI

Prevention

Both organizations have

worked very well on

prevention of livestock and

human disease.

Coping

PDO has been working

effectively on relief works

and give good advice for the

community to utilize

livestock resources properly

to cope the recurrent

drought.

Livestock and human health

sectors activities help in

preventing human health

and animal health

disasters, but preventing

crop shortage, livestock

feed and water shortage is

difficult for organizations.

Relief support and livestock

market awareness given by

pastoral development office

have great importance on

coping food shortage and sell

of more livestock.

Recovery

Recovery is becoming

difficult to the majority of

the community except

PSNP beneficiaries who

gets support for 6 months

or they have great support

for consecutive 6 months

Health sector activities

(animal and human) help

in recovering from loss of

livestock by some fatal

diseases like anthrax and

supply of mosquito net

help in recovering from

frequent ailment of

(malaria.

Overall_Effectiveness

Majority of the community

is this PA should have got

support as PSNP

beneficiaries either by

government and NGOs

particularly NGOs support

should be increased and

holistic rather than helping

few penniless from PA.

We have no capacity to

evaluate all activities of

organizations or short fall

of each organization.

319

Page 3 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Community Perception of DRM System and Actors - Perception of the community on the effectiveness of DRM

system in helping them to prevent, cope and recover from disasters

KebeleName

ERBORE

Prevention

Both organization have had

a strong effort to prevent

the community from

disasters, they have also

fast response during rapid

onset of flood.

Coping

They provide necessary

needs of the community that

can help each house hold in

curing from this incidence.

Recovery

All type of supplies has

been sufficient for each

community house hold

which could recover from

flood effect.

Overall_Effectiveness

we dont have any

prevalence on the

government and NGO side

in preventing and recovery

process of flood effect but

the only problem was and

will be on the community

side i.e. most of us are not

willing to accept preventive

measures from both

organizations response.

320

Page 4 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Community Perception of DRM System and Actors - Perception of the community on the effectiveness of DRM

system in helping them to prevent, cope and recover from disasters

KebeleName

KOLA KEJA

Prevention

Farm Africa has been

working effectively in the

PA for 5 years to alleviate

disaster and the community

has got several preventing

and precaution methods

from disasters through

repeated training and close

follow up by this

organization.

Coping

government office (pastoral

development office) is also

working well since last year

by distributing relief on time

and giving response when

disasters occurs in our PA

(livestock disease hinder).

DA s also pays close follow

up to submit early warning

indicators on time.

Recovery

Farm Africa and

government office have

been working well in

support of our community

due to hunger season, but

we need more help for

sustainable recovery from

food and livestock feed

shortage.

Overall_Effectiveness

During hunger season food

transfer is delayed,

however we dont have

information about the

cause of delay. Disasters

and causes have been

collected so many times by

different organization

inclusive of government,

but we dont get relief from

hunger, therefore we want

the change of rain fed

agriculture through more

endeavour (effort) of

governments and NGOs.

321

Page 5 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Community Perception of DRM System and Actors - Perception of the community on the effectiveness of DRM

system in helping them to prevent, cope and recover from disasters

KebeleName

ERBORE

LALA

Prevention

Mosquito net supply, animal

vaccination, and seed

supply activities have

helped the community from

preventing malaria

infection and animal

disease out breaks.

Coping

Supply of food aid and

support of temporary

settlement materials for

displaced community have

helped to recover from flood

disasters.

Livestock health services

and human health services

have been helped the

community to prevent from

loss of livestock resources

which is the main lively

hood.

Relief food supply, mosquito

net supply, controlling

vaccination and treatment

programmes backed the

community to cope during

diseases without breaks and

food shortage (hunger)

season.

Recovery

NGOs and government

offices have helped the

community to recover

from flood disasters by

making settlements,

fulfilling utensils and

various livestock and

human treatments

institutions, but the

communities are not

willing to leave.

All the above activities

have helped the

community to recover

from hunger and loss of

livestock disasters.

Particularly relief food

supplies have saved our

resources from sell or

lost.

Overall_Effectiveness

No we haven’t seen any

short falls from government

offices and NGOs activities.

No we dont know. It is

difficult to evaluate this by

pastoralist and rural

community.

322

Page 6 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Community Perception of DRM System and Actors - Perception of the community on the effectiveness of DRM

system in helping them to prevent, cope and recover from disasters

KebeleName

ERIYA

MRSHA

Prevention

Animal and human health

services (vaccination

activities) have helped us

for preventing livestock

disease, awareness creation

activities given by police

and justice office have

helped also to prevent from

committing crimes.

We dont know for future,

but till last year (2002)

both organizations have

been supporting the

community especially early

warning work process.

Coping

During outbreak of disease

and hunger responses given

by pastoral development

office used the community

to cope the existing

(appeared) disasters.

Nothing left from the

government and the NGO

side, but what is left is from

the community .i.e. our

community is resistant for

change, even relief work is

difficult for government

body due to lack of clarity

from the community.

Recovery

All the above activities

have helped us recovering

from the appeared

disasters.

Overall_Effectiveness

May be lack of sufficient

drugs at hand or in vet and

human health clinics

hampered activities to be

conducted frequently right

after the occurrence of

incidences.

As mentioned before the

government and NGO have

been supported us during

food shortage and other

development activities

which can reduce

disaster, but weakness are

remaining in the

community.

We dont claim any

organization for disaster

responses, but we have

grievance for not getting

water shortage responses

although several problem

identification assessments

made and water shortage

problem prioritized first so

that activities shouldnt be

promised for the

community, if there is no

money at hand for the

accomplishment of this

activity.

323

Page 7 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Community Perception of DRM System and Actors - Perception of the community on the effectiveness of DRM

system in helping them to prevent, cope and recover from disasters

KebeleName

GEDBAK

ASELE

Prevention

Except supply of mosquito

net and child vaccination

all activities havent

prevented from effects of

disaster.

activities conducted by

police and justice office

about reconciliation with

Borena other ethnics has

helped the community to

prevent from conflict and

reduced its level and

duration ,supply of

mosquito net and relief

food aid have helped to

prevent from severe hunger

and malaria.

Coping

Food aid activity has helped

the community to escape

hunger seasons.

Food aid supplies have

helped to cope hunger during

severe food shortage

seasons.

Recovery

However food supply was

delayed, it helped us to

recover from hunger

during peak food shortage

seasons.

At the time of disaster all

activities have helped to

cope the disaster, but we

couldnt recover from

food, and livestock feed

shortages yet.

Overall_Effectiveness

We dont know why all

activities hadnt been

effective.

No, we couldnt have

capacity to evaluate why

all government and NGOs

activities havent been

effective. To recover us

from hunger and livestock

feed and water shortages.

324

Page 8 of 9

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Community Perception of DRM System and Actors - Perception of the community on the effectiveness of DRM

system in helping them to prevent, cope and recover from disasters

KebeleName

WENBAYNO

Prevention

Both organizations asset

the community in

controlling some disasters

and prevention of some

(relief for hunger and

livestock vaccination and

treatment for disease

disasters)

Coping

Early warning work process

help (regional, zonal and

federal) very well during

prolonged drought in

supplying food.

Recovery

The organization EW

provides food items until

good seasons.

Overall_Effectiveness

We travel along distance to

take relief due to absence

of distribution points in our

areas. So grain store should

be established near our and

neighbouring village.

325

Page 9 of 9

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Major Public Interventions Desired - Percentage of households by type of

intervention desired

Major public interventions desired by the community

Degree of Importance for the community

Better job

1st

2nd

3rd

0.80

0.97

0.65

Cash transfers/social assistance

2.24

4.35

3.55

Cash-for-work activities (not employment)

12.00

35.10

0.16

Food aid

29.60

6.12

9.37

Food-for-work activities

35.50

8.37

7.75

Fuel subsidies

0.16

0.00

31.70

Medical assistance

5.59

13.50

4.20

Micro-credit programmes

5.59

11.80

10.30

School feeding for children

0.32

0.97

0.16

Subsidized health care

1.76

3.06

19.40

Supplementary feeding for women and young children

5.91

14.50

9.37

326

Page 1 of 1

WDRP Indicators

Other Community Characteristics

327

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Zone SOUTH OMO

Capacity: Community Based Organizations in the Wereda

Name_Of_Organization

Est._Year

Formal/Informal

HEDBAK

Warcha purchasing

cooperative

2002

DEGA KEJA

loya dele women association

2001

SHANKO

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

KOLA KEJA

Pastoralist saving and credit

cooperative

no any type of formal and

informal association in PA

There is no any type of

formal informal organization

Voluntary saving group

2002

2000

ERBORE

LALA

Limo youth association

Lala women cooperative

2000

ERIYA

Pekela

1998

328

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Type of Members

Voluntary 35 men

groups

women

Male and female

members

Male and female

members

Activity

"Purchasing and selling of

shop commodities, food,

grain, food oil, coffee,

brewing local drinks which is

called borde for local

community(for sale)

They voluntary save money

for any bad happenings

They voluntary save money

for any bad happenings

Women

Kuyle and Gonderoba

youth

Women

Voluntary all adult

groups

They contribute money and

save for the utilization of bad

times(hunger, health

familiarity)

Trading of livestock

Petty trading (they trade

food grain, coffee busk,

goats)

Food and coffee busk trading

Page 1 of 2

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Selected Indicator

Kebele Name

Zone SOUTH OMO

Capacity: Community Based Organizations in the Wereda

Name_Of_Organization

Est._Year

Formal/Informal

MRSHA

GEDBAK

There is no any type of

formal informal organization

Warecha multipurpose

cooperation

2002

Disaster Risk Management and Food

Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Type of Members

Activity

voluntary man and

women

"trading of shop commodities

(soap,salt,tradational

ornaments,

329

Page 2 of 2

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Supporting Agencies against Disasters - Percentage of households by supporting

institutions to handle or recover from disaster damages

Supporting Agencies Against Disasters

Response_Percentage

National or local authorities

40.00

International NGOs (e.g. UN organizations, ICRC, etc.)

21.20

Local NGOs

0.17

Family members in the same community

0.17

Friends and neighbors in the same community

0.17

Support via contacts working for the authorities

3.67

Support via contacts working for NGOs

32.80

Religious sources such as the mosque

0.67

Food Aid

1.17

Supporting Agencies Against Disasters

3.7

32.8

0.7

0.2

1.2

0.2

21.2

0.2

Family members in the

same community

Food Aid

Friends and neighbors in

the same community

International NGOs (e.g.

UN organizations, ICRC,

etc.)

Local NGOs

National or local

authorities

Religious sources such

as the mosque

Support via contacts

working for NGOs

Support via contacts

working for the

authorities

330

Page 1 of 1

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Types of support received by households during disasters

Type of Support Provided By Supporting Agencies

Response_Percentage

Emergency aid (food, water, shelter, etc.)

98.70

Capital for re-construction of house and property

0.33

Access to loan for re-construction

0.33

Access to capital or loan for adaptation/protection measures

0.16

0.49

Type of Support Provided By Supporting Agencies

Access to capital or loan

for adaptation/protection

measures

Access to loan for

re-construction

Capital for

re-construction of house

and property

Emergency aid (food,

water, shelter, etc.)

331

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Government Actors in the Field of Disaster Risk Management - Government actors and their activities in the field

of Disaster Risk Managements

Government Institution

Activity

Description

Activity

Description Activity

Description Activity Description

Water Resource

Development Office

Health Office

Water office of the

woreda

Making weekly and

monthly databases

surveillance and

responses

technical

supports,

maintenance,

following up

community

water

management

committee

Health posts

make a target

diseases

surveillance and

report at weekly

and monthly

basis

Mobilizing the

community

action against

Epidemic

diseases

Short

maintenance

and

management

of the water

system , for

pump

institutions

Making a

regular

meeting with

health

committee

and voluntary

health

promoters at

kebele level

Assessing

regional and

national

assistance to

protect the

community

Early

identificatio

n of

epidemics

and early

report to

the

concerned

bodies in

order to get

financial

and

manpower

support

332

Page 1 of 4

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Government Actors in the Field of Disaster Risk Management - Government actors and their activities in the field

of Disaster Risk Managements

Government Institution

Activity

Description

Activity

Description Activity

Description Activity Description

Health Office

Pastoral Community

Development Office

Conduct vaccination

Train woreda early

warning experts

Conduct seasonal

vaccination for

children and

adults

(mother-lactatin

g, mothers)

Increase

awareness on

household

sanitation

The project has

trained woreda

early warning

and kebele level

development

agents about

early warning

indicators and

reporting system

Development of

water sources

House to

house

sanitation

awareness

has been

given for the

last five to

six years to

reduce

communicabl

e disease

The project

has allocated

budget for

shallow well

construction

Supply

mosquito net

and

anti-malaria

drugs to all

clinics and

health posts

Allocate

budget for

drug

procurement

Sufficient

mosquito

nets and

anti-malaria

drugs have

been

supplied

before

malaria

incidence

The project

allocate

budget for

drugs

procuremen

333

Page 2 of 4

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Government Actors in the Field of Disaster Risk Management - Government actors and their activities in the field

of Disaster Risk Managements

Government Institution

Activity

Description

Activity

Description Activity

Description Activity Description

Pastoral Community

Development Office

Peace and Security

Office

Collect and transfer

weekly early

warning reports

Crime prevention

Team collect

and analyse

weekly EW

indicators and

submit organized

report to zonal

level agricultural

department

collect and

transfer monthly

early warning

reports

Awareness

creation

collect and

analyse

monthly early

warning

report and

submit

organized

reports after

getting

approval

health office,

education

and water

office experts

organizationa

l concerned

early warning

issues

Conduct

meher and

belg crop

assessment

and submit

reports

Taking legal

actions

Conduct

annual belg

and meher

crop and

market

assessment

reports and

submit to

zonal,

regional and

federal

concerned

bodies

334

Page 3 of 4

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Disaster Risk Management and

Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Region S.N.N.P

Zone SOUTH OMO

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Government Actors in the Field of Disaster Risk Management - Government actors and their activities in the field

of Disaster Risk Managements

Government Institution

Activity

Description

Activity

Description Activity

Description Activity Description

Wereda Disaster

Preparedness and

Prevention Office (DPPO)

conduct weekly

early warning

assessment and

reports

Conduct weekly

EW assessment

including

livestock and

crop market and

submit reports to

zonal level EW

response and

food security

process

Conduct monthly

EW assessment

and report

collect

monthly EW

reports and

submit to

regional and

zonal level

EW response

and food

security work

process

Conduct belg

and meher

crop

assessment

and submit

reports

Conduct

annual belg

and meher

season crop

assessment

with

coordination

of health

office,

water and

livestock

and crop

developmen

t experts in

our office

335

Page 4 of 4

Data_Collected_Date

Region S.N.N.P

September 2010

Zone SOUTH OMO

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Non-Government Actors in the Field of Disaster Risk Management -

Non-government actors and their activities in the field of Disaster Risk

Management

Non Governmental Actors

in the Wereda

Activities

GTLI (Global Team for

local initiatives)

Farm Africa

Establish shallow wells

Provide training

336

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

Region

Selected Indicator:

Zone

Interventions: Community Suggestions to Development Actors

Kebele Name

Type Of Disaster 1

Early Warning Indicator

Preparedness Measure

Type Of Disaster 2

Early Warning Indicator

Preparedness Measure

Type Of Disaster 3

Early Warning Indicator

Preparedness Measure

Type Of Disaster 4

Early Warning Indicator

Preparedness Measure

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

September 30, 2014

Wereda

337

Page 1 of 1

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Wereda Strengths, weaknesses, opportunites and treats (SWOT) Analysis

Kebele Name

Strength

Weakness

Opportunity

Threat

HEDBAK

SHANKO

DEGA KEJA

KARDESO

Water and soil conservation

initiatives (making terraces

at hills, up, downs)

High social cooperation

during food shortage and

high participation Keeping

high number of livestock to

reduce their problems

Strong social interaction

and collaboration during

disasters especially during

hunger Keeping a number

of livestock finding distant

grazing and watering points

by affecting themselves

Depending low cost

customary food and drink

and insurance for hunger

High social interaction to

farm to conflict areas on

the other side of omo river

Increasing bushes and shrubs

clearing far from extension,

rapidly increasing population

Increasing the deforestation

activities for farming

system(crop)

Increasing cutting down of

trees for sell and farm

extension Increased

negligence on management

of natural resources Erosion

of culture and lessening

social interaction

Addicting bad habits and

wasting incomes collected

from tourism (drinking too

much alcohols)

Increasing agricultural

extension for soil and water

conservation activities

To work infrastructure, making

places for national market

improving livestock products

Good price offer for livestock

and construction of all-weather

road For better improvement

of livestock market Introduce

of project that participate the

community in food and cash for

work projects, establishment of

health services

Increasing population and

conflict far from land

resource

Range land management to

decrease the degradation

of land, introducing new

technology

Rapid deforestation

activities deterioration of

rain fall, reduced livestock

produce and production

Increasing livestock

mobility and introduce new

livestock disease

Vast and fertile cultivable land

and permanent water resource

Lack of supply for

irrigation pumps, damage

of farm land by water

pressure /water bank farm

land/

338

Page 1 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Wereda Strengths, weaknesses, opportunites and treats (SWOT) Analysis

Kebele Name

BESSA MEJAN

MINOGELTI

Strength

High social interaction

during food shortage and

conflict rises Ability to

identify early warning

indicators culturally

There is high social

collaboration during hunger

and conflict

Weakness

Low awareness on pasture

management and negligence

even awareness given

Increasing deforestation

activities for farm activities

The area is not suitable for

rain fed agriculture rather

the shoats keeping,

considering looting as

livestock acquisition

Opportunity

Be fitting environment for

livestock production and bee

keeping when rehabilitation

works made

Availability of road to improve

livestock and crop markets

SHESHA GOYKE

In discriminate helping each

other regardless of leaving

standard Dependency on

low price commodities

Maintaining livestock

resources/save livestock

resources trekking too long

distances where grass and

water points available

resisting hunger and other

difficulties

Increase environmental

degradation (cutting trees for

fire and construction wood

for sale)

Establishment of market points

and marketing of linkage

Threat

Increasing completion for

grazing and water points

which results conflict

Increasing of introduction

of new livestock disease

like CCPP and still

explicitly un identified

sheep disease introduced

from Kenya, increase of

conflict, depletion of

shoats

Increasing deterioration of

rain fall, increasing

degradation of natural

resources

339

Page 2 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Wereda Strengths, weaknesses, opportunites and treats (SWOT) Analysis

Kebele Name

ERBORE

MURALE

KOLA KEJA

Strength

There is high social

interaction The level of

literate increasing from

year to year High social

cooperation during disaster

High social cooperation

during disaster

Strong tie among the

community to help each

other during disaster

Keeping large and

diversified livestock’s

Cultural ability to identified

livestock Insurance of

hazards especially for

hunger utilizing very low

cost commodities

Weakness

Deforestation of river side

areas, increasing settlement

beside the river

Resistance to change

settlement areas which are

prove for flooding

Deforestation of river side

areas, increasing settlement

beside the river

Lack of clarity for external

bodies during hazard

identification Unwillingness

to offer their livestock for

market Persistency on

cultural methods of hazard

speculation Dependency

syndrome instead of using

their livestock resource

Opportunity

Dam construction as though on

and off construction has been

implementing

Threat

Increase deforestation of

the side of Woitor river

which can be the main

cause of flooding

Dam construction for farm

purpose that will reduce over

flooding

Increase agricultural extension

and institutions Enough

marketable livestock resource

Increase institutions that work

on hazards Good price offer for

livestock

Increasing deforestation,

farm extension,

settlements to river sides

Prolonged dry seasons and

deterioration of pasture

land Unwillingness of the

community for changes,

increased resistance for

changes Lack of funding

Perishing of livestock

resources owing to drought

due to their resistance for

market offer

340

Page 3 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Wereda Strengths, weaknesses, opportunites and treats (SWOT) Analysis

Kebele Name

LALA

ERIYA

Strength

High social interaction and

collaboration during

disasters Keeping a number

of livestock finding grazing

points at distant area to

resist hunger Ability to

survive on low cost

commodities

High social interaction

strong culture to help one

another during hunger

Keeping more livestock

whatever the severity of

feed shortage increased

driving too long distances to

save their resource Ability

to survive on low cost

commodities for long time

Weakness

Increasing the remaining

forest destruction

Settlement at hilly areas or

unwillingness to leave hilly

areas as though there is plain

area

Clearing of vast land for farm

extension without yield Low

awareness and reluctance for

livestock marketing (majority

of herders)

Opportunity

Increasing awareness about

natural resource rehabilitation

and change of them

Road construction and good

price offer for livestock

Extension of livestock health

services both in government

and private

Threat

Increasing population and

settlement, increasing

deforestation Reduce of

livestock produce, reduce

of honey produce due to

deforestation Increasing

soil erosion and reducing

soil fertility

Introduce of livestock

disease, bush and shrub

clearing for farm (blouses)

with yield without crop

yield Settlement

increment and pasture land

narrowing Increasing

population due to

polygamy

341

Page 4 of 5

Wereda Disaster

Risk Profile

Data_Collected_Date

September 2010

Region S.N.N.P

Zone

SOUTH OMO

Disaster Risk Management

and Food Security Sector (DRMFSS)

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Wereda HAMER

Selected Indicator

Wereda Strengths, weaknesses, opportunites and treats (SWOT) Analysis

Kebele Name

MRSHA

ASELE

Strength

High level of cooperation

among the community

during food shortage Split

herding to reduce livestock

loss

Strong social interaction

Willingness of the majority

to avoid conflict with

Borena Increasing farm

practice using Woito river

over flow

Weakness

Unwillingness to reduce

livestock number and

resistance for change, relief

dependency syndrome

Reluctance to conserve

natural environment Lack of

early warning during

disasters Giving misleading

information about disasters

Increasing settlement at

unfavorable location

Increasing deforestation,

increasing livestock looting

for acquisition by youngsters

(looting from Borena)

Resistance for afforestation

awareness and reluctance

Opportunity

Road construction is promising

for livestock market improves

Road (all weather) construction

good livestock price offer

Threat

The level of dryness and

environmental change is

increasing from time to

time ie Dry seasons are

extending which results

shortage of livestock feed

and water

Increasing shortage of rain

fall, increasing competition

for grazing and conflict,

increasing population and

shortage of pasture land

342

Page 5 of 5